Multi-Objective Optimization in the Conceptual Phase of Vehicle Development

Conference paper

Abstract

This paper deals with the usage of multi-objective optimization techniques in the early stage of vehicle development. Integration of multi-objective optimization tools with vehicle dynamics simulation tools can provide significant improvements in the development process. Development of the optimization model, based on evolutionary algorithms, that is able to handle a large number of variables, constraints and objectives, and the usage of vehicle dynamics simulation tools, is a precondition for a complete solution for the conceptual phase of vehicle development. Some necessary steps lead to development of optimization models. These steps are identification of influence parameters, selection of criteria for the evaluation of vehicle dynamic characteristics and selection of optimization algorithms. Using a simulation eliminates the need for vehicle prototype in the early stage of development and reduces costs of development. Achieving optimum parameters of the vehicle at this stage of development reduces the possibility of wrong solutions or concepts.

Keywords

Vehicle dynamics Multi-objective optimization Evolutionary algorithms Vehicle parameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schelkle E, Klamser H (2003) CAE Simulation for Passive Safety focused on the Porsche Cayenne - the Transition to New Technologies, 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Ulm, Germany, May 22-23, 2003Google Scholar
  2. Volz K, Frodl B, Dirschmid F, Stryczek R, Zimmer H (2007) Optimizing Topology and Shape for Crashworthiness in Vehicle Product Development, International Automotive Body Congress - IABC 2007, Berlin, Germany, June 17–19, 2007Google Scholar
  3. Shkula PK, Deb K (2007) On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 181, No. 3, September 2007Google Scholar
  4. Tomić R. Šagi G. Mahalec I (2009) Analysis and Optimization of Low Floor Vehicle Steering System Configuration, 6th International Congress of Croatian Society of Mechanics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September 30–October 2, 2009Google Scholar
  5. Fujita K, Noriyasu H, Shinsuke A, Takanori H (1998) Design Optimization of a Multilink Suspension System for Total Vehicle Handling and Stability. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, 1998Google Scholar
  6. Hwang JS, Kim SR, Han SY (2007) Kinematic design of a double wishbone type front suspension mechanism using multi-objective optimization, 5th ACAM Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, Brisbane, 2007Google Scholar
  7. Khajavi MN, Notghi B, Paygane G (2010) A Multi Objective Optimization Approach to Optimize Vehicle and Handling Characteristics, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 62, 2010Google Scholar
  8. Fadel G, Haque I, Blouin V, Wiecek M (2005) Multi-criteria Multi-scenario Approaches in the Design of Vehicles, 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Rio de Janeiro, May 30–June 3, 2005Google Scholar
  9. Schuller J, Haque I, Eckel M (2002) An approach for optimisation of vehicle handling behavior in simulation, The dynamics of vehicles on roads and on tracks Vehicle, System Dynamics Supplement 37, 24-37, 2002Google Scholar
  10. Gobbi M, Haque I, Papalambros PPY, Mastinu G (2006) A Critical Review of Optimization Methods for Road Vehicles Design, 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, 2006Google Scholar
  11. Uys PE, Els PS, Thoresson MJ (2006) Criteria for handling measurement, Journal of Terramechanics 43, 43–67, 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations