A Proposed Method for Design for Eco-Finance

Conference paper


Products are becoming more complex to the extent that some elements of the design may be outsourced to multiple external vendors. Hence, any changes made during design activities can generate significant additional costs and time With high upfront design and development costs being common place specifically in low-volume high-value electronics production, the ability to accurately predict the anticipated financial burden of both these activities, and through-life production changes is of great importance to a business, especially in light of probable future influences such as environmentally driven legislation. The paper describes a new approach to address such issues, through the development of an Eco-Financial Decision Support System to help electronics companies provide rapid responses and quotations for the design and development of new or obsolescent products. These will be addressed through development towards ‘Design for Eco-Finance’ (DfEF), a new component of the DfX family, which will allow designers to perform a trade-off between environmental impacts and costs, supporting the financially viable, sustainable design of electronics products.


Eco design Eco-finance Financial modelling Decision support Sustainability Resource management End-of-life 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Charter M, Clark, T (2007) Key conclusions from sustainable innovation conferences 2003-2006. By the Centre for Sustainable Design, UK. Available via:Google Scholar
  2. Chen JL, Shih LH, Yang JS et al. (2005) Eco-design Activities in Taiwan. National Science Council of Taiwan, NSC Grant Reference: NSC93-262 1-Z006-009 and NSC93-22 12-E006-080.Google Scholar
  3. Cobley A, Mason T (2007) The evaluation of sonochemical techniques for sustainable surface modification in electronic manufacturing. Circuit World 33(3):29-34Google Scholar
  4. Curran R, Kundu A, Raghunathan S et al. D (2003) Influence of manufacturing tolerance on aircraft direct operating cost (DOC). Journal of Materials Processing Technology 138(1-3):208-213Google Scholar
  5. Curran R, Price M, Raghunathan S et al. (2005) Integrating aircraft cost modelling into conceptual design. Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 13(4):321-330Google Scholar
  6. Daoud W, Hassanzadeh M, Cornier A et al. (2007) Ecoselection of materials and process for medium voltage products. Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses, Proceedings of the 14th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Japan, June 11th-13th, 2007, Publisher: Springer LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Eastman CM (1996) Design for X: concurrent engineering imperatives. Publisher: Springer. 1st edn. ISBN-10: 0412787504, ISBN-13: 978-0412787508Google Scholar
  8. Envirowise (2004) Sustainable design of electrical and electronic products to control costs and comply with legislation. Good Practice Guide, GG427.Google Scholar
  9. Huang Z, Conway PP, Jung E et al. (2006) Reliability issues in Pb-free solder joint miniaturization. Journal of Electronic Materials 35(9):1761-1772Google Scholar
  10. Jeswiet J, Hauschild M (2005) EcoDesign and future environmental impacts. Materials and Design, 26:629- 634Google Scholar
  11. Lee HB, Cho NW, Hong YS (2010) A hierarchical end-of-life decision model for determining the economic levels of remanufacturing and disassembly under environmental regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production 18:1276-1283Google Scholar
  12. Luttropp L, Lagerstedt J (2006) EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(15-16):1396-1408Google Scholar
  13. Mellor W, Wright E, Clift R, et al. (2002) Mathematical model and decision support framework for material recovery, recycling and cascaded use. Chemical Engineering Science 57(22-23):4697-4713Google Scholar
  14. Mena C, Whicker L, Templar S et al. (2002) Costing the supply chain. Manufacturing Engineer 81(5):225-228Google Scholar
  15. Mills E, Shamshoian G, Blazek M et al. (2008) The business case for energy management in high-tech industries. Energy Efficiency Journal 1:5-20Google Scholar
  16. Newnes LB, Mileham AR, Cheung WM et al. (2008) Predicting the whole-life cost of a product at the conceptual design stage. Journal of Engineering Design 19(12):99-112Google Scholar
  17. SEEDA (2007) Sustainability appraisal RES implementation plan - A Scoping Report, February 2007, Available via:[Cited 14 June 2011]Google Scholar
  18. Segura-Velandia DM, Conway PP, West AA, Whalley DC, Wilson AR, Huertas-Quintero LAM (2007) Complex low volume electronics simulation tool to improve yield and reliability. The Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium IEMT ‘07, San Jose, CA, USA, 3-5 Oct. 2007:1-7Google Scholar
  19. Sousa I, Wallace D (2006) Product classification to support approximate life-cycle assessment of design concepts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(3):228-249Google Scholar
  20. Stevens GC, Herman H, Baird PJ (2007) Rapid assessment of electronic product enclosure plastics for improved resource management. Polymers in Electronics 2007 Munich:310-331Google Scholar
  21. Taurino R, Pozzi P, Zanasi T (2010) Facile characterization of polymer fractions from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) for mechanical recycling. Waste Management 30(12):2601-2607Google Scholar
  22. The Singapore Green Plan 2012 (2006) Available via: [Cited 14 June 2011]
  23. Treasury HM (2006) The climate change levy package, Available via: [Cited 23 July 2011]
  24. Trimingham RL (2010) Co2ncept: Carbon footprinting for design concepts. EPSRC Grant Reference: (Lboro) EP/H022422/1Google Scholar
  25. Wiggins A (2010) Manufacturing electronic devices using embossing and microcontact printing. the Innovative electronics Manufacturing Research Centre (IeMRC) (GR/T07459/01)Google Scholar
  26. Zhang HC, Li J, Shrivastava P, Whitley A (2004) A web-based system for reverse manufacturing and product environmental impact assessment considering end-of-life dispositions. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 53(1): 5-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wolfson School of Mechcnial and Manufacturing EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations