Skip to main content
  • 2519 Accesses

Abstract

For critical airline components, design and failure data is not released by the manufacturer, and the maintenance execution of these components is mandated, planned and executed by the manufacturer. This yields maintenance practices identical for all systems within the fleet, independent of the historical usage of the operator. And since the design spectrum is not validated towards the actual usage spectrum, this will result in too early replacements of components which in turn increase life-cycle maintenance costs and reduce overall availability. In this research, a usage severity driven maintenance framework is proposed, which zooms in at the actual failure mechanisms applied on the component and then calculates its service live based on the loads acting on the component under several circumstances. For the Chinook T-55 engine, this maintenance strategy reduces life-cycle maintenance costs with 20 % while availability has increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • 1. Kumar UD (2000) Reliability, Maintenance and Logistic support: A life cycle approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2. Tinga T (2010) Applications of Physical Failure Models to Enable Usage and Load Based Maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 1061-1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • 3. Melchers R (1999) Structural reliability: analysis and prediction. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • 4. Li C (1995) Computation of the Failure Probability of Deteriorating Structural Systems. Computers and Structures. 56:1073-1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • 5. Esary JD, Ziehms H (1975) Reliability of Phased Mission: Reliability and Fault-Tree Analysis. Society for Industrial Applied Mathematics. 213-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • 6. Chew SP, Dunnett SJ, Andrews JD (2008) Phased Mission Modeling of Systems with Maintenance-free Operating Periods Using Simulated Petri Nets. Microelectronics Reliability. 1293-1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • 7. Clarotti CA, Contini S, Somma R (1980) Repairable Multiphase Systems: Markov and Fault-Tree Approaches for Reliability Evaluation. Apostolakis G. 94:45-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • 8. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A Review on Machinery Diagnostics and Prognostic Implementing Condition-Based Monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 1483-1510.

    Google Scholar 

  • 9. Wang W (2010) A Model to Determine the Optimal Critical Level and the Monitoring Intervals in Condition-Based Maintenance. International Journal of Production Research. 1425-1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • 10. Curran R, Abu-Kian T, Repko MJF et al. (2010) A Value Operations Methodology for Value Driven Design: Medium Range Passenger Airliner Validation. In: Proceedings of AIAA Annual Society Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • 11. Saaty TL (2003) How to Make a Decision: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operations Research. 48:9-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • 12. Adamides ED, Stamboulis YA, Varelis AG (2004) Model-Based Assessment of Military Aircraft Engine Maintenance Systems. Journal of Operations Research Society. 957-967.

    Google Scholar 

  • 13. Banks JC, Reichard KM, Hines JA et al. (2010) Platform Degrader Analysis for the Design and Development of Vehicle Health Management Systems. The Journal of the Reliability Information Analysis Center. 18-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • 14. Palmgren AG (1924) Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, 68: 339–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • 15. ASTM (1999) Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis. Techncial Report ASTM E 1049-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • 16. Franke L, Dierkes G (1999) A Non-Linear Fatigue Damage Rule with an Exponent Based on a Crack Growth Boundary Condition. International Journal of Fatigue. 21:761-767.

    Google Scholar 

  • 17. Sonsino CM (2007) Course of SN-curves Especially in the High-Cycle Fatigue Regime with Regard to Component Design and Safety. International Journal of Fatigue. 29:2246-2258.

    Google Scholar 

  • 18. Robinson EL (1952) Effect of Temperature Variation on the Long-Time Rupture Strength of Steels. Trans ASME. 74:777-781.

    Google Scholar 

  • 19. Lewis EE (1994) Introduction to Reliability Engineering. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • 20. Kaplan EL. Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Amer. Statist. Assn. 53:457-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • 21. Montgomery JE, Clark JM (1962) Dust Erosion Parameters for a Gas Turbine. In: SAE Summer Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Stuivenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stuivenberg, T., Ghobbar, A.A., Tinga, T., Curran, R. (2013). Towards a Usage Driven Maintenance Concept: Improving Maintenance Value. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4425-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4426-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics