Skip to main content

Current Concurrency in Practice

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Concurrent Engineering has been a major theme in the 80 s and 90 s of the previous century in research and practice. Many advantages have been achieved in terms of cost and time reduction and quality improvement. While starting with a design-manufacturing alignment, gradually the CE way of thinking has been extended to incorporate more lifecycle functions together with a stronger focus on and involvement of both customer and supplier. In this paper a history of CE is sketched as well as its major achievements and challenges. Challenges are briefly described that exist in two application areas, aeronautics and agro-food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainscough M, Yasdani B (2000) Concurrent Engineering with British Industry. Concurrent Engineering 8: 1, 2-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beelaerts van Blokland, W.W.A., Verhagen, W.J.C., Santema, S.C. (2008), The effects of co-innovation on the value-time curve, J of Business Market Mngt, Vol.2, No. 1, pp. 5-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beelaerts van Blokland, WWA, van der Meer, O, and R Rakers (2010) Co-innovation and the Value-time Curve: A Case Study on the Dassault Falcon 7X and Embraer 170/190 Series, New World Situation: New Directions in Concurrent Engineering 2010, Part 7, 441-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom RP (1990) Assembly, promises & simultaneous engineering. Prod 102: 2, 50-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y-M, Liang M-W (2010) Design and implementation of a collaborative engineering information system for allied concurrent engineering. Int J Comp Int Manuf 13: 1, 11-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2004) Managing open innovation. R Techn Mgmt Jan-Feb: 23-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance: strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleetus J (1992) Definition of concurrent engineering. CERC Technical Report CERC-TR-RN-92-003, Concurrent Engineering Research Center, West Virginia University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, R, Butterfield, J, Jin, Y, Collins, R and and R. Burke (2011) Value Driven Manufacture: Digital Lean Manufacture, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, R, Beeleart, W, Abu-Kias, T, Repco, MJF, Sprengers, YLJ, and PNCS van der Zwet (2012) Value Operations Methodology (VOM) applied to medium-range passenger airliner design, IOS Press, Journal of Aerospace Operations 1 (2012) 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Mgt 36: 3, 333-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exostar (2007) Boeing 787: Global supply chain management takes flight, http://www.exostar.com.

  • Grunert KG, Wognum N, Trienekens J, Wever M, Veflen Olson N, Scholderer J (2011) Consumer demand and quality assurance: segmentation basis and implications for chain governance in the pork sector. J Ch N Sc 11: 2, 889-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros X, Vonderembse M, Doll W (2000) Concurrent engineering and its consequences. J Op Mgmt 19: 97-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenox M, King A, Ehrenfeld J (2000) An assessment of design-for-environment practices in leading US electronic firms. Interfaces 30: 3, 83-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu SC-Y, Elmaraghy W, Schuh G, Wilhelm R (2007) A scientific foundation of collaborative engineering. Annals of the CIRP, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.010 56: 2, 605-633.

  • MacPherson, A and D Pritchard (2007) Boeing’s Diffusion of Commercial Aircraft Technology to Japan: Journal of Labor Research, Volume 28, Number 3 (2007), 552-566

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor R, Humphreys P (2004) Early supplier involvement in the design process: lessons from the electronics industry. Omega 32: 179-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • INCOSE (2011): http://www.incose.org/practice/whatissystemseng.aspx

  • O’Neal Ch (1993) Concurrent engineering with early supplier involvement: A cross-functional challenge. Int. J Purch Mat Mgmt 3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Costa AIA (2008) Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Tr Food Sc & T 19: 574-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terwiesch C, Loch CH, Meyer A de (2002) Exchanging preliminary information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Org Sc 13: 4, 402-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd S (1992) Collective action: Theory and application. University of Michigan Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trygg L (1993) Concurrent Engineering practices in selected Swedish companies: A movement or an activity of the few? J Prod Inn Mgmt 10: 5, 403-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever M, Wognum N, Trienekens J, Omta O (2010) Alignment between chain quality management and chain governance in EU pork supply chains: a transaction-costs-economics perspective. Meat Science 84: 228-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke W (2006) The inter-organizational context of open innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (Eds.) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • VIVACE (2005) Collaborative methods and tools. VIVACE Forum, CERFACS, EADS, Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaert SSA Graaf de R, Minderhoud S (1998) Collaborative Engineering: Concurrent Engineering in a wider context, A literature review. J Eng Techn Mgmt 15: 87-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner RJ, Pennell JP, Bertrand HE, Slusarczuk MM (1988) The role of concur-rent engineering in weapons system ac-quisition. IDA R-338. Institute for Defense Analyses, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wognum N, Trienekens J. Wever M, Vlajic J, van der Vorst J, Omta O, Hermansen J, Nguyen T (2007) Organisation, logistics and environmental issues in the European pork chain. In: Trienekens J, Petersen B, Wognum N, Brinkmann D (eds) European pork chains. Diversity and quality challenges in consumer-oriented production and distribution. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin GA, Smith ME (2005) Managing supply risk with early supplier involvement: A case study and research propositions. J SCM Fall: 44-57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nel Wognum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wognum, N., Curran, R. (2013). Current Concurrency in Practice. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4425-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4426-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics