Multispectral Iris Fusion and Cross-Spectrum Matching

  • Mark J. Burge
  • Matthew Monaco
Part of the Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition book series (ACVPR)


Traditionally, only a narrow band of the Near-Infrared (NIR) spectrum (700–900 nm) is utilized for iris recognition since this alleviates any physical discomfort from illumination, reduces specular reflections and increases the amount of texture captured for some iris colors. However, previous research has shown that matching performance is not invariant to iris color and can be improved by imaging outside of the NIR spectrum. Building on this research, we demonstrate that iris texture increases with the frequency of the illumination for lighter colored sections of the iris and decreases for darker sections. Using registered visible light and NIR iris images captured using a single-lens multispectral camera, we illustrate how physiological properties of the iris (e.g., the amount and distribution of melanin) impact the transmission, absorbance, and reflectance of different portions of the electromagnetic spectrum and consequently affect the quality of the imaged iris texture. We introduce a novel iris code, Multispectral Enhanced irisCode (MEC), which uses pixel-level fusion algorithms to exploit texture variations elicited by illuminating the iris at different frequencies to improve iris matcher performance and reduce Failure-To-Enroll (FTE) rates. Finally, we present a model for approximating an NIR iris image using features derived from the color and structure of a visible light iris image. The simulated NIR images generated by this model are designed to improve the interoperability between legacy NIR iris images and those acquired under visible light by enabling cross wavelength matching of NIR and visible light iris images.


Visible Light Iris Image Dark Section Iris Recognition Biometric Template 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Boyce, C., Ross, A., Monaco, M., Hornak, L., Li, X.: Multispectral iris analysis: a preliminary study. In: Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Biometrics. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burger, W., Burge, M.J.: Digital Image Processing: An Algorithmic Introduction Using Java. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daugman, J.G.: Complete discrete 2-D gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 36(7), 1169–1179 (1988)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daugman, J.: How iris recognition works. IEEE Trans. CVSVT 14(1), 21–30 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3(6), 610–621 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain, A., Bolle, R., Pankanti, S.: Introduction to biometrics. In: Jain, A., Bolle, R., Pankanti, S. (eds.) Biometrics: Personal Identification in a Networked Society. Kluwer, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monaco, M.: Color space analysis for iris recognition. MSEE Dissertation, West Virginia University (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., Boyle, R.: Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision. Thomson, Toronto (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The MITRE CorporationMcLeanUSA
  2. 2.NoblisFalls ChurchUSA

Personalised recommendations