Systems Approach to Energy-Ecological Analysis of Complex Buildings

Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The mathematical model of the balance of direct energy consumption of energy carriers in complex buildings is based on Leontief’s input–output analysis [7]. Energy carriers are divided into those produced inside complex buildings, and possibly supplemented from outside, and energy carriers entirely supplied from outside. Direct consumption of energy carriers does not, however, comprise all the energy required for the needs of complex buildings, because the fuels, materials, and energy carriers, supplied to them, are changed by energy consumption due to: the extraction of primary energy and raw materials; the processing of primary energy to final energy carriers; and the transport and consumption of devices for gaining and processing energy carriers.The balance of cumulative exergy consumption is also expressed by the “input–output analysis”, assuming that the connections between complex buildings and the entire economy of a country are weak. This means that in the balance of cumulative energy consumption in complex buildings the indices of cumulative energy consumption concerning the input data (e.g., fuels and water) are assumed to be quantities known a priori, equal to the average values for the whole country. The mathematical model of the balance of cumulative emissions of complex buildings may be formulated based on analogical assumptions. A complete thermo-ecological analysis should also include the depletion of non-renewable energy resources. This may be expressed by the so-called thermo-ecological cost, based on the balance of cumulative exergy consumption. The thermo-ecological cost expresses the cumulative exergy consumption of non-renewable natural resources, including their additional consumption due to the necessity of compensating the environmental losses caused by the release of harmful emissions connected with the existence of complex buildings. Balances of the thermo-ecological costs of complex buildings are also based on input–output analysis, taking into account the principle of weak connections. Systems approach, similarly based on input–output analysis may be applied for the assessment of the system effects of the rationalization of energy management in complex buildings. The input values in this analysis are the results of thermodynamic process analysis concerning the individual consumers of energy carriers or the process of producing energy carriers.

Keywords

Cogeneration 

References

  1. 1.
    Born P (1996) Input-output analysis: input of energy, CO2 and work to produce goods. J Policy Model 18(2):217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frangopulos CA (1991) Intelligent functional approach: a method for analysis and optimal synthesis-design-operation of complex systems. Int J Energy, Environ, Econ 1(4):257–274Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Górzyński J (2000) Methodical fundamental of energy-ecological analysis of building in its life cycle (in Polish). Instytut Techniki Budowlanej, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grekas DN, Frangopulos CA (2001) A heuristic algorithm for drawing of a flow diagram. Adv Eng Softw 32:239–253MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoinka K, Ziebik A (2007) Mathematical model of energy management of complex buildings for ecological analysis. ECOS 2007 20th international conference on efficiency, cost, optimisation, simulation and environmental impact of energy systems, Padova, Italy June 25–28Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lenzen M, Murray SA, Korte B, Dey CJ (2003) Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects: a case study using input–output analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leontief W (1986) Input-output economics, 2nd edn. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanek W (2009) Method of evaluation of ecological effects in thermal processes with the application of exergy analysis (in Polish). Silesian University of Technology, GliwiceGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szargut J, Ziębik A (2000) Fundamentals of thermal engineering. PWN, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szargut J (1978) Minimisation of the consumption of natural resources. Bull Polish Academy of Science. Ser Technol 26(6):41–45Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szargut J (1986) Application of exergy for the determination of ecological costs. Bull Polish Academy of Science. Ser Technol 34(7–8):475–480Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szargut J (2005) Exergy analysis: technical and ecological applications. WIT, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szargut J, Ziebik A, Stanek W (2002) Depletion of the non-renewable natural exergy resources as a measure of the ecological cost. Energy Convers Manage 43:1149–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ziębik A (1990) Mathematical modeling of energy management system in industrial plants. Ossolineum, WrocławGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ziebik A, Hoinka K, Kolokotroni M (2005) System approach to the energy analysis of complex buildings. Energy & Buildings 37(9):930–938Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ziębik A (1997) System approach to the rationalisation of industrial energy plants. Arch Energy 1–2:203–216Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ziębik A (1996) System analysis in thermal engineering. Arch Thermodyn 17:81–97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Thermal TechnologySilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations