Abstract
Major complications following surgery of the digestive tract are associated with increased morbidity, prolonged intensive care and hospital stay, and even mortality. Infectious complications are frequent; an infectious complication rate of 21 % has recently been described following colorectal surgery. Among the most severe infectious complications are anastomotic failures. Reported leakage rates range from 0.6 to 23 %. The reconstruction following resections, and not so much dissection and resection itself, causes most surgical adverse events. The frequency and consequences vary according to the target organ and the executed operation. A postoperative mortality of 12–39 % following anastomotic leakage has been reported, compared to 2–5 % without leakage. On the opposite, incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage was 42 % among patients who died and 11 % in the uneventful group in a large population-based trial.
Even if an anastomosis can be preserved, late complications are observed frequently, such as anastomotic strictures leading to obstruction or continence problems. Furthermore, anastomotic leakages may result in permanent stomata. Conflicting results persist whether anastomotic leakage is associated with an increased local recurrence rate and a worse oncologic outcome.
Early recognition and intervention can prevent severe consequences of major complications, such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death. Early diagnosis and repair within 5 days following initial surgery was not associated with mortality in a retrospective analysis of 655 patients, whereas repair in a later postoperative course was associated with a mortality rate of 18 %.
Sepsis can be difficult to distinguish from the systemic inflammatory response related to surgical trauma. Since clinical features of complications can be nonspecific and interpretation of diagnostic tests can be incorrect, early diagnosis remains a challenge, even in the era of the widespread availability of imaging techniques. A median time to clinical diagnosis of a complicated postoperative course was 8 days in recent studies.
These results emphasize the importance of early recognition of complications. The question remains when anastomotic dehiscence occurs after a standard operative procedure. The daily assessment of patients’ clinical condition is the most important guidance for the surgeon. A patient has to clinically improve every day during a normal postoperative course, and every decline should prompt evaluation of the possible problem.
This chapter focuses on clinical features and diagnostics contributing to early recognition of major complications following abdominal surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Isbister WH. Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Aust N Z J Surg. 2001;71:516–20.
den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Påhlman L, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rödel C, Bujko K, van de Velde CJ. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1066–75.
Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg. 2006 Apr;93(4):498–503.
Park IJ. Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jul;14(7):1190–6.
Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, et al. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:554–9.
Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339–51.
Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jul;12(7 Online):e76–81.
Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1157–68.
DuBrow RA, David CL, Curley SA. Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: evaluation with CT and barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:567–71.
MacKay GJ, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ. C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infectious complications following elective colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2011 May;13(5):583–7.
Kube R, Mroczkowski P, Granowski D, Benedix F, Sahm M, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Study group Qualitätssicherung Kolon/Rektum-Karzinome (Primärtumor) (Quality assurance in primary colorectal carcinoma). Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery: a predictor of significant morbidity and hospital mortality, and diminished tumour-free survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Feb;36(2):120–4.
Woeste G, Müller C, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C. Increased serum levels of C-reactive protein precede anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):140–6.
den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers MA, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, Menon AG, Steup WH, van de Velde CJ. Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;35(4):420–6.
Welsch T, Muller SA, Ulrich A, et al. C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious complications in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:1499–507.
Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 May;46(5):653–60.
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):439–44.
van Sandick JW, Gisbertz SS, ten Berge IJ, Boermeester MA, van der Pouw Kraan TC, Out TA, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Immune responses and prediction of major infection in patients undergoing transhiatal or transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):35–43.
Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jan;12(1):37–43.
Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:448–54.
Power N, Atri M, Ryan S, Haddad R, Smith A. CT assessment of anastomotic bowel leak. Clin Radiol. 2007 Jan;62(1):37–42.
Khoury W, Ben-Yehuda A, Ben-Haim M, Klausner JM, Szold O. Abdominal computed tomography for diagnosing postoperative lower gastrointestinal tract leaks. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Aug;13(8):1454–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gisbertz, S.S., Straatman, J., Cuesta, M.A. (2014). General Principles of Recognition of Major Complications Following Surgery of the Digestive Tract. In: Cuesta, M., Bonjer, H. (eds) Treatment of Postoperative Complications After Digestive Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4354-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4354-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4353-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4354-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)