Skip to main content

General Principles of Recognition of Major Complications Following Surgery of the Digestive Tract

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Treatment of Postoperative Complications After Digestive Surgery

Abstract

Major complications following surgery of the digestive tract are associated with increased morbidity, prolonged intensive care and hospital stay, and even mortality. Infectious complications are frequent; an infectious complication rate of 21 % has recently been described following colorectal surgery. Among the most severe infectious complications are anastomotic failures. Reported leakage rates range from 0.6 to 23 %. The reconstruction following resections, and not so much dissection and resection itself, causes most surgical adverse events. The frequency and consequences vary according to the target organ and the executed operation. A postoperative mortality of 12–39 % following anastomotic leakage has been reported, compared to 2–5 % without leakage. On the opposite, incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage was 42 % among patients who died and 11 % in the uneventful group in a large population-based trial.

Even if an anastomosis can be preserved, late complications are observed frequently, such as anastomotic strictures leading to obstruction or continence problems. Furthermore, anastomotic leakages may result in permanent stomata. Conflicting results persist whether anastomotic leakage is associated with an increased local recurrence rate and a worse oncologic outcome.

Early recognition and intervention can prevent severe consequences of major complications, such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death. Early diagnosis and repair within 5 days following initial surgery was not associated with mortality in a retrospective analysis of 655 patients, whereas repair in a later postoperative course was associated with a mortality rate of 18 %.

Sepsis can be difficult to distinguish from the systemic inflammatory response related to surgical trauma. Since clinical features of complications can be nonspecific and interpretation of diagnostic tests can be incorrect, early diagnosis remains a challenge, even in the era of the widespread availability of imaging techniques. A median time to clinical diagnosis of a complicated postoperative course was 8 days in recent studies.

These results emphasize the importance of early recognition of complications. The question remains when anastomotic dehiscence occurs after a standard operative procedure. The daily assessment of patients’ clinical condition is the most important guidance for the surgeon. A patient has to clinically improve every day during a normal postoperative course, and every decline should prompt evaluation of the possible problem.

This chapter focuses on clinical features and diagnostics contributing to early recognition of major complications following abdominal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Isbister WH. Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Aust N Z J Surg. 2001;71:516–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Påhlman L, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rödel C, Bujko K, van de Velde CJ. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1066–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg. 2006 Apr;93(4):498–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Park IJ. Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jul;14(7):1190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, et al. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:554–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. www.clinicalaudit.nl

  7. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jul;12(7 Online):e76–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1157–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DuBrow RA, David CL, Curley SA. Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: evaluation with CT and barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:567–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacKay GJ, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ. C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infectious complications following elective colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2011 May;13(5):583–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kube R, Mroczkowski P, Granowski D, Benedix F, Sahm M, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Study group Qualitätssicherung Kolon/Rektum-Karzinome (Primärtumor) (Quality assurance in primary colorectal carcinoma). Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery: a predictor of significant morbidity and hospital mortality, and diminished tumour-free survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Feb;36(2):120–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woeste G, Müller C, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C. Increased serum levels of C-reactive protein precede anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers MA, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, Menon AG, Steup WH, van de Velde CJ. Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;35(4):420–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Welsch T, Muller SA, Ulrich A, et al. C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious complications in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:1499–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 May;46(5):653–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):439–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Sandick JW, Gisbertz SS, ten Berge IJ, Boermeester MA, van der Pouw Kraan TC, Out TA, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Immune responses and prediction of major infection in patients undergoing transhiatal or transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jan;12(1):37–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:448–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Power N, Atri M, Ryan S, Haddad R, Smith A. CT assessment of anastomotic bowel leak. Clin Radiol. 2007 Jan;62(1):37–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoury W, Ben-Yehuda A, Ben-Haim M, Klausner JM, Szold O. Abdominal computed tomography for diagnosing postoperative lower gastrointestinal tract leaks. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Aug;13(8):1454–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel A. Cuesta MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gisbertz, S.S., Straatman, J., Cuesta, M.A. (2014). General Principles of Recognition of Major Complications Following Surgery of the Digestive Tract. In: Cuesta, M., Bonjer, H. (eds) Treatment of Postoperative Complications After Digestive Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4354-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4354-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4353-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4354-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics