How Should I Operate on a Lithotriptor for Optimum Results?



Although ESWL remains the primary treatment of choice for the majority of urinary stones smaller than 2 cm many centers report disappointing results. The reason for this is often multifactorial. Excellent results can be obtained however provided proper attention is paid to all aspects of the procedure. These aspects are discussed in detail together with some simple tips to optimize results and at the same time minimize complications.


ESWL Urolithiasis Shockwave lithotripsy Lithotripter Stone management 


  1. 1.
    Bohris C, Roosen A, Dickmann M, et al. Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera. J Urol. 2012;187:157–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaussy C, Tailly GG, Bernd F, et al. Extracorporeal SW-lithotripsy in a nutshell. In: Chaussy C, Tailly GG, editors. 2nd ed. Dornier MedTech; 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kravchick S, Bunkin I, Stepnov E, Peled R, Agulansky L, Cytron S. Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary-tract stones. J Endourol. 2005;19:1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li G, Williams Jr JC, Pishchalnikov YA, Liu Z, McAteer JA. Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance. BJU Int. 2012;110(116):E871–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Picozzi S, Ricci C, Gaeta M, et al. Urgent shock wave lithotripsy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 570 patients. Urol Res. 2012;40:725–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seitz C, Fajković H, Remzi M, et al. Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance. Eur Urol. 2006;49:1099–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tailly GG. Lithotripsy systems. In: Smith AD, Preminger G, Badlani G, Kavoussi L, editors. Smith’s textbook of endourology. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2012. p. 559–75. ISBN 13: 978-1-4443-3554-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tailly GG. Patient controlled analgesia during ESWL-treatments. J Endourol. 2001;15(5):465–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tiselius HG, Chaussy CG. Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective. Urol Res. 2012;40:433–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tombal B, Mawlawi H, Feyaerts A, Wese FX, Opsomer R, Van Cangh PJ. Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones. Eur Urol. 2005;47:855–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyAZ KlinaBrasschaatBelgium

Personalised recommendations