The Need for an Objective Measurement In Vivo of Rotational Stability of the ACL-Deficient Knee: How Can We Measure It?

  • Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso
  • Franceska Zampeli
  • Andrea Castelli
  • José María Baydal-Bertomeu
  • A. D. Georgoulis
Chapter

Abstract

Rotational stability plays a key role in restoring normal function of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction [15]. Therefore, the accurate evaluation of rotational stability would be an important outcome indicator of ACL reconstruction. The only clinical test for examining rotational stability of the knee is the pivot-shift test [46]. Most surgeons now recognize the importance of the pivot-shift test. A positive pivot-shift test, regardless of the grade, is indicative of a functionally deficient ACL and remains the sine qua non indication for surgery [13]. Moreover, it is predictive of poor subjective and objective outcome, patient discomfort, disability, failure to return to previous level of sport, increased scintigraphic activity in the subchondral bone, and development of osteoarthritis of the knee at long term [20, 21, 24, 50]. Therefore, accurate assessment of the pivot-shift phenomenon is clinically mandatory. However, currently, the gold standard for evaluation of rotational knee stability after ACL tears in the office is based on patient history and subjective un-instrumented physical examination, the pivot-shift test, which is highly variable and dependent on examiner’s skill and experience and has both a low sensitivity and low interobserver reliability [32]. Moreover, the rotational load applied to the knee during the pivot-shift test is much lower than the load applied to the knee during sports activities. Furthermore, patient guarding can lead to false negatives. Moreover, clinical pivot-shift test cannot evaluate small rotational differences between the pathological/reconstructed and the healthy contralateral knee. Finally, the pivot-shift test is often only testable during examination under anesthesia. In our series, the sensitivity of the physical examination with the patient awake was 37.5 %, whereas the sensitivity of the physical examination with the patient under general anesthesia was 87.5 % [42]. Therefore, a negative clinical pivot-shift test does not necessarily involve a normal rotational stability. Currently, however, there is no simple, commercially available device to measure knee rotational stability in vivo.

Keywords

Torque Osteoarthritis Sine Shoe 

References

  1. 1.
    Ageberg E, Forssblad M, Herbertsson P, et al. Sex differences in patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish Knee Ligament Register. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1334–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, et al. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:39–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andriacchi TP, Dyrby CO. Interactions between kinematics and loading during walking for the normal and ACL deficient knee. J Biomech. 2005;38:293–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andriacchi TP, Mundermann A, Smith RL, et al. A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:447–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrance PJ, Williams N, Snyder-Mackler L. Altered knee kinematics in ACL-deficient non-copers: a ­comparison using dynamic MRI. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:132–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Swärd L. Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:361–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, et al. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11:90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chambers H, Sutherland D. A practical guide to gait analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:221–31.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, et al. Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:189–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clancy WG, Ray JM. Anterior cruciate ligament autografts. In: Jackson DW, Drez D, editors. The anterior cruciate deficient knee. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1987. p. 193–210.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis R, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, et al. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 1991;10:575–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Decker M, Torry M, Noonan T, et al. Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1408–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeFranco MJ, Bach BR. A comprehensive review of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91-A:198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferretti A, Monaco E, Labianca L. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive kinematic study using navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1548–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fu FH, Zell BA. Rotational instability of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Georgoulis AD, Papadonikolakis A, Papageorgiou CD, et al. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knee during walking. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:75–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V, et al. Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giotis D, Tsiaras V, Ristanis S, et al. Knee braces can decrease tibial rotation during pivoting that occurs in high demanding activities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1347–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ingersoll CD, Grindstaff TL, Pietrosimone BG. Neuromuscular consequences of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27:383–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J. Positive pivot-shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:594–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK. Relationship between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:629–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kubo S, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S, et al. Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:54–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lam MH, Fong DT, Yung PS, et al. Knee rotational stability during pivoting movement is restored after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1032–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leitze Z, Losse RE, Jokl P. Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop. 2005;436:229–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Logan M, Dunstan E, Robinson J, et al. Tibiofemoral kinematics of the ACL deficient weightbearing. Living knee employing vertical access open “interventional” multiple resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:720–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Losee RE. The pivot shift. In: Feagin JA, editor. The crucial ligaments. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. p. 301–15.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lucchetti L, Cappozzo A, Cappello A, et al. Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics. J Biomech. 1998;31:977–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McNair P, Marshall R. Landing characteristics in subjects with normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:584–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, et al. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1414–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Misonoo G, Kanamori A, Ida H. Evaluation of tibial rotational stability of single-bundle vs. anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during a high-demand activity – A quasi-randomized trial. Knee. 2012;19(2):87–93. Epub 2011 Feb 12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Musahl V, Ayeni OR, Citak M, et al. The influence of bony morphology on the magnitude of the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1232–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF. An analysis of the pivot-shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:148–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Petermann JP, Trus P, Niess C. A modified pivot-shift test for diagnosis confirmation in anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee. 1999;6:131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech. 1997;30:729–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, et al. The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:360–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, et al. Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, et al. Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16:111–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Siarava E, et al. Effect of femoral tunnel placement for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on tibial rotation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91-A:2151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rue JPH, Ghodadra N, Bach BR. Femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A cadaveric study relating transtibial lateralized femoral tunnel position to the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle femoral origins of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:73–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an ­assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1139–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sanchis-Alfonso V. Relationship between the obliquity of the graft in the coronal plane and rotatory stability after ACL reconstruction. Book of abstracts, ACL Study Group annual meeting, Engelberg, 2008.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sanchis-Alfonso V, Baydal-Bertomeu JM, Castelli A, et al. Laboratory evaluation of the pivot shift phenomenon using kinetic analysis. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93-A:1256–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sherman MF, Brandon ML, Barrett GR. Posterior inferior tibial slope and its association with ACL tears. Book of abstracts. ACL Study Group Meeting, Sardinia, 2004.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, et al. Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees: a theoretical proposition for the development of osteoarthritis. Sports Med. 2007;37:601–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Strobel M, Stedtfeld H-W. Diagnostic evaluation of the knee. Berlin: Springer; 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tashman S, Kopf S, Fu FH. The kinematic basis of ACL reconstruction. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2008;16:116–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tsarouhas A, Iosifidis M, Spyropoulos G, et al. Tibial rotation under combined in vivo loading after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament ­reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1654–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Walla DJ, Albright JP, McAuley E, et al. Hamstring control and the unstable anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13:34–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Webster KE, McClelland JA, Wittwer JE, et al. Three dimensional motion analysis of within and between day repeatability of tibial rotation during pivoting. Knee. 2010;17:329–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Whitehead TS, Crossan ML, Conway A. Is there a correlation between subjective IKDC scores and both pivot-shift and KT-1000 measurements following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Book of abstracts. ACL Study Group Meeting, Engelberg, 2008Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yamaguchi S, Gamada K, Sasho T, et al. In vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees during pivot and squat activities. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zampeli F, Ntoulia A, Giotis D, et al. Correlation between anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity and tibial rotation during dynamic pivoting activities in patients with anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo examination. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(2):234–46. Epub 2011 Nov 10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zazulak PT, Paterno M, Myer GD, et al. The effects of the menstrual cycle on anterior knee laxity: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2006;36:847–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso
    • 1
    • 2
  • Franceska Zampeli
    • 3
  • Andrea Castelli
    • 4
  • José María Baydal-Bertomeu
    • 4
  • A. D. Georgoulis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHospital Arnau de VilanovaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy UnitHospital 9 de OctubreValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Orthopaedic Sports Medicin Center, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  4. 4.Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia (IBV)Universidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations