Interventional Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

  • Vivek MuthuranguEmail author
  • Oliver Richard Tann
  • Andrew M. Taylor


Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly replacing diagnostic cardiac catheterization as a method of assessing cardiac anatomy, measuring blood flow and quantifying ventricular function. Nevertheless, interventional cardiac catheterization is a growth area in congenital heart disease. Furthermore, diagnostic cardiac catheterization is still necessary when intra-cardiac or intra-vascular pressure measurements are necessary. Currently, X-ray fluoroscopy is the imaging modality of choice for guiding cardiac catheterization with some interventions also utilizing echocardiography. However, there are problems with this approach and the use of MR during catheterization may be able to solve them. In this chapter the role of MR in the catheterization laboratory, both for guidance and cardiac assessment, will be reviewed. By the end of this chapter the reader should have a greater understanding of the current state and future possibilities of interventional cardiac MR.


Congenital Heart Disease Cardiac Catheterization Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Guide Wire Pulmonary Artery Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    National Radiation Protection Board. Guidelines on patient dose to promote the optimisation of protection for diagnostic medical exposures; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Razavi R, Hill DL, Keevil SF, et al. Cardiac catheterisation guided by MRI in children and adults with congenital heart disease. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1877–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lurz P, Nordmeyer J, Muthurangu V, et al. Comparison of bare metal stenting and percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation for treatment of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction: use of an x-ray/magnetic resonance hybrid laboratory for acute physiological assessment. Circulation. 2009;119(23):2995–3001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schalla S, Saeed M, Higgins CB, Martin A, Weber O, Moore P. Magnetic resonance – guided cardiac catheterization in a swine model of atrial septal defect. Circulation. 2003;108(15):1865–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miquel ME, Hegde S, Muthurangu V, et al. Visualization and tracking of an inflatable balloon catheter using SSFP in a flow phantom and in the heart and great vessels of patients. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51(5):988–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sorensen TS, Atkinson D, Schaeffter T, Hansen MS. Real-time reconstruction of sensitivity encoded radial magnetic resonance imaging using a graphics processing unit. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(12):1974–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Hurtak WF, van Vaals JJ, Viergever MA, Mali WP. MR-guided endovascular interventions: susceptibility-based catheter and near-real-time imaging technique. Radiology. 1997;202(1):273–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lederman RJ. Cardiovascular interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2005;112(19):3009–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss S, Wirtz D, David B, et al. In vivo evaluation and proof of radiofrequency safety of a novel diagnostic MR-electrophysiology catheter. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(3):770–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tzifa A, Krombach GA, Kramer N, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided cardiac interventions using magnetic resonance-compatible devices: a preclinical study and first-in-man congenital interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(6):585–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhode KS, Hill DL, Edwards PJ, et al. Registration and tracking to integrate X-ray and MR images in an XMR facility. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(11):1369–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muthurangu V, Taylor A, Andriantsimiavona R, et al. Novel method of quantifying pulmonary vascular resistance by use of simultaneous invasive pressure monitoring and phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow. Circulation. 2004;110(7):826–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuehne T, Yilmaz S, Schulze-Neick I, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided catheterisation for assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Heart. 2005;91(8):1064–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muthurangu V, Atkinson D, Sermesant M, et al. Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR guided cardiac catheterization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289(3):H1301–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuehne T, Yilmaz S, Steendijk P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of right ventricular pressure-volume loops: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2004;110(14):2010–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivek Muthurangu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Oliver Richard Tann
    • 2
  • Andrew M. Taylor
    • 3
  1. 1.UCL Centre for Cardiovascular MR, University College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Cardio-Respiratory UnitGreat Ormond Street HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Cardio-Respiratory UnitUCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK

Personalised recommendations