Skip to main content

Anatomy of the Pelvis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pelvic Cancer Surgery

Abstract

The anatomy of the pelvis is presented in this chapter. A brief description of the anatomy of the posterior aspect of the abdominal wall is presented, along with a description of the pelvic floor and the differences between the male and the female pelvis. Points with surgical interest concerning the urinary bladder and the prostate are discussed. Recently obtained evidence on the neuroanatomy of the pelvis, particularly the pelvic plexus, the neurovascular bundle and the external urethral sphincter is presented in detail. The latter structures are associated to the bladder function, the erectile function and the urinary continence mechanism. Their preservation during pelvic surgical procedures has been associated to the improvement of the functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, Campeggi A, Allory Y, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(1):99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kauff DW, Kempski O, Huppert S, Koch KP, Hoffmann KP, Lang H, Kneist W. Total mesorectal excision—does the choice of dissection technique have an impact on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation? J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(6):1218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen C, Li W, Li F, Liu P, Zhou J, Lu L, Su G, Li X, Guo Y, Huang L. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal ligament. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(1):245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sulak O, Cankara N, Malas MA, Cetin E, Desdicioglu K. Anatomical development of the normal urachus during the fetal period. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(1):30–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heidenreich A, Ohlmann CH, Polyakov S. Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL. The surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1987;2(3):158–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boileau MA. Exposure of puboprostatic ligaments and dorsal vein complex during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1990;17(1):47–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abboudi H, Ahmed K, Royle J, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, N’Dow J. Ureteric injury: a challenging condition to diagnose and manage. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(2):108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung J, Ahn HK, Huh Y. Clinical and functional anatomy of the urethral sphincter. Int Neurourol J. 2012;16(3):102–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holstege G. Micturition and the soul. J Comp Neurol. 2005;493(1):15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J. Structure and function of the bladder neck. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2001;159(III–XII):1–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwalenberg T, Neuhaus J, Dartsch M, Weissenfels P, Löffler S, Stolzenburg JU. Functional anatomy of the male continence mechanism. Urologe A. 2010;49(4):472–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chancellor MB, Perkin H, Yoshimura N. Recent advances in the neurophysiology of stress urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(1):21–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Selman SH. The McNeal prostate: a review. Urology. 2011;78(6):1224–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park BJ, Sung DJ, Kim MJ, Cho SB, Kim YH, Chung KB, Kang SH, Cheon J. The incidence and anatomy of accessory pudendal arteries as depicted on multidetector-row CT angiography: clinical implications of preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(6):587–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwalenberg T, Neuhaus J, Liatsikos E, Winkler M, Löffler S, Stolzenburg JU. Neuroanatomy of the male pelvis in respect to radical prostatectomy including three-dimensional visualization. BJU Int. 2010;105(1):21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis LP, Jelenko C. Sexual function after abdominoperineal resection. South Med J. 1975;68(4):422–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clausen N, Wolloscheck T, Konerding MA. How to optimize autonomic nerve preservation in total mesorectal excision: clinical topography and morphology of pelvic nerves and fasciae. World J Surg. 2008;32(8):1768–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128(3):492–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Myers RP, Rocco B, Villers A. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):179–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, Tomita K, Yonemasu H, Nakamura M, Oda Y, Naito S, Hasegawa Y. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34(8):463–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghani KR, Trinh Q-D, Menon M. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy-technique in 2012. J Endourol. 2012;26(12):1558–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chabert CC, Merrilees DA, Neill MG, Eden CG. Curtain dissection of the lateral prostatic fascia and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a veil of mystery. BJU Int. 2008;101(10):1285–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn L-C, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):629–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Minh D, Dietel A, Häfner T, Dimitriou D, Al-Aown A, Kyriazis I, Liatsikos EN. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases. J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1467–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int. 2004;94(7):1071–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walsh PC. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. J Urol. 2005;174(2):566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akita K, Sakamoto H, Sato T. Origins and courses of the nervous branches to the male urethral sphincter. Surg Radiol Anat Sra. 2003;25(5–6):387–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Breza J, Aboseif SR, Orvis BR, Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Detailed anatomy of penile neurovascular structures: surgical significance. J Urol. 1989;141(2):437–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Strasser H, Bartsch G. Anatomy and innervation of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. Semin Urol Oncol. 2000;18(1):2–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dorschner W, Biesold M, Schmidt F, Stolzenburg JU. The dispute about the external sphincter and the urogenital diaphragm. J Urol. 1999;162(6):1942–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Narayan P, Konety B, Aslam K, Aboseif S, Blumenfeld W, Tanagho E. Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J Urol. 1995;153(2):337–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, Casellato S, Gazzano G, Consonni D. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol. 2007;52(2):376–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, Bozzini G, Gazzano G, Morabito A. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006;175(6):2201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2008;180(3):1018–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Burnett AL, Mostwin JL. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis S. Kallidonis MD, PhD(Urol), MSc(Clin Pharma) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kallidonis, P.S. et al. (2015). Anatomy of the Pelvis. In: Patel, H., Mould, T., Joseph, J., Delaney, C. (eds) Pelvic Cancer Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4257-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4258-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics