Skip to main content

Pelvic Virtual Reality Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1950 Accesses

Abstract

Simulation has been used in one fashion or another since time immemorial, but for surgery performed within body cavities, the true breakthrough was the advent of more advanced computer graphics and interfaces allowing for VR training units, which are now being found in more branches of medicine, from general surgery to urology and gynecology (Satava, Surg Endosc 15:232–41, 2001).

Pelvic Surgery is one domain where the anatomy and pathology can be extremely unforgiving, yet surgeons still need to develop their surgical, cognitive and affective skills in order to be able to work in this ‘hostile’ environment.

As surgical services become more and more centralized, it is even more difficult to expose a potential future pelvic surgeon to the range of ideas, techniques and patients they need to be ready to deal with at the end of their training.

It is with that in mind that more and more units are looking to Simulation Training as a cost effective and safe way to train surgeons in pelvic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/medical-school/tips/aims_objectives.html. Accessed 13 Nov 2010.

  2. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1; the cognitive domain. New York: David Mcay; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschieri A, Szabo Z. Chapter 4: Intracorporeal knots in endoscopic surgery. In: Cuschieri A, Szabo Z, editors. Tissue approximation in endoscopic surgery. Oxford: ISIS Medical Media; 1995. p. 42–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szabo Z, Hunter J, Berci G, Sackier J, Cuschieri A. Analysis of surgical movements during suturing in laparoscopy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:​55–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson A. Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying in surgical simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:2662–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Krummel TM. Simulation and virtual reality in surgical education. Real or unreal? Arch Surg. 1999;134:1203–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Small S. Thoughts on patient safety education and the role of simulation. Virtual Mentor. 2004;6:3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaba D. Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. BMJ. 2000;320:785–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ericsson KA. The acquisition of expert performance: an introduction to some of the issues. In: Ericsson KA, editor. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. p. 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. TURP Simulator http://simbionix.com/simulators/virtamed-turpsim/.

  12. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135(1):21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N, Albano HA, Malinow A, Jones SB, Moorman DW, Pawlowski JB, Jones DB. Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:885–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaubien JM, Baker DP. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: how low can you go? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:51–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Entin EE, Serfaty D. Adaptive team coordination. Hum Factors. 1999;41:312–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peyton JWR. Teaching and learning in medical practice. Rickmansworth: Manticore Europe; 1998. p. 174–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Satava RM. Surgical education and surgical simulation. World J Surg. 2001;25:1484–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kneebone J. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Blackwell Med Educ. 2003;37:267–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Satava RM. Accomplishments and challenges of surgical simulation. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:232–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon S. Fleming MBBS Lond., MRCS (Eng), M.Sc (Dist), MAcadMEd, MFSTEd, AFHEA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fleming, S.S., Patel, B. (2015). Pelvic Virtual Reality Systems. In: Patel, H., Mould, T., Joseph, J., Delaney, C. (eds) Pelvic Cancer Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4257-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4258-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics