Abstract
Energy efficiency improvement is one of the most important measures for CO2 emission reduction and energy resource sustainability. There are large differences in energy efficiency among countries in several sectors. The differences are also potential opportunities for energy-saving and CO2 emission reduction. The potential emission reductions in the power, iron and steel, and cement sectors alone are 2.7 GtCO2 per year in total. However, there are various barriers to technology diffusion. The barriers differ based on country, sector, size of company, and other factors. Removing the barriers is important and also presents opportunities for green growth. Barriers are very large in general, and therefore, high carbon prices are needed for deep emission reductions when explicit carbon prices, such as with carbon taxes and emission trading schemes, are adopted. However, the feasibility of introducing high carbon prices is very slim. Removing barriers by bottom-up measures is more useful and acceptable in the real world than a top-down approach, and such measures are expected to reduce emissions substantially.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Production-based CO2” is measured by emissions inside a nation. Emission measurement is widely used in several statistics and for emission reduction targets. “Consumption-based CO2” measurement focuses on the CO2 emissions generated to produce the goods that are consumed inside a region regardless of production site locations and inevitably, imports and exports of goods must be taken into account. This concept is based on the LCA approach, and is similar to the concept of carbon footprint.
References
CEMBUREAU (2003) World cement directory 2002, vols. I and II. CEMBUREAU – The European Cement Association, Brussels
Dubin J (1992) Market barriers to conservation: are implicit discount rates too high?, Working Papers No. 802, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Pasadena, CA
ECCJ (2004) Report on investigations for diffusions of energy saving technologies. Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ). http://www.eccj.or.jp/diffusion/03/diffusion.pdf (in Japanese)
EPA (2005) Interim report: New powertrain technologies and their projected costs, EPA420-R-05-012. http://www.epa.gov/OMS/technology/420r05012.pdf
Helm D, Smale R, Phillips J (2007) Too good to be true?: the UK’s climate change record. http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/publications/Carbon_record_2007.pdf. Accessed January 2009
Homma T, Akimoto K, Tomoda T (2008) Evaluation of sectoral and regional CO2 emissions: production-based and consumption-based accounting measurements. In: GTAP Conference 2008 (11th Annual conference future of global economy), Finland
IEA (2007) Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emissions. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2009) Energy technology transitions for industry – strategies for the next industrial revolution. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2010a) Energy balances of OECD countries 2010 edition. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2010b) Energy balances of non-OECD countries 2010 edition. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2010c) CO2 emission from fuel combustion 2010 edition. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2010d) Energy technology perspectives 2010. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2011a) Energy balances of OECD countries 2011 edition. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2011b) Energy balances of non-OECD countries 2011 edition. OECD/IEA, Paris
NEDO (2008) Basic study on energy conservation and environmental protection measures targeting the cement industry in India. FY2007, Commissioned to Taiheiyo Engineering Corporation (in Japanese)
Oda J, Akimoto K, Sano F, Tomoda T (2007) Diffusion of energy efficient technologies and CO2 emission reductions in iron and steel sector. Energy Econ 29:868–888
Oda J, Akimoto K, Tomoda T, Nagashima M, Wada K, Sano F (2012) International comparisons of energy efficiency in power, steel, and cement industries. Energy Policy 36(9):3477–3484
RITE (2011) Report of project of the alternative pathways toward sustainable development and climate stabilization (ALPS). http://www.rite.or.jp/Japanese/h22seikahoukoku/22jigyou/22alps.pdf (in Japanese)
Tanaka K (2008) Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy. Energy Policy 36:2887–2902
Train K (1985) Discount rates in consumers’ energy-related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy 10(12):1243–53
Wada K, Akimoto K, Sano F, Oda J, Homma T (2012) Energy-efficiency opportunities in the residential sector and their feasibility. Energy (Forthcoming)
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2005) CO2 accounting and reporting standard for the cement industry, The cement CO2 protocol, Ver. 2.0, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI). http://www.gispri.or.jp/calculation/ghg/pdf/cement_protocol_v2-or.pdf.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2009) Cement industry energy and CO2 performance: getting the numbers right, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI), 2009. http://www.wbcsdcement.org/GNR-2009/
Worldsteel (2011) Steel statistical yearbook 2011, Worldsteel Committee on Economic Studies. World Steel Association, Brussels. http://www.worldsteel.org/publications/bookshop?bookID=170d9015-24ee-452b-81f5-6effe1e6ab50
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akimoto, K. (2012). Potential for Energy Efficiency Improvement and Barriers. In: Yamaguchi, M. (eds) Climate Change Mitigation. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 4. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4228-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4228-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4227-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4228-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)