Potential for Energy Efficiency Improvement and Barriers

  • Keigo Akimoto
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 4)


Energy efficiency improvement is one of the most important measures for CO2 emission reduction and energy resource sustainability. There are large differences in energy efficiency among countries in several sectors. The differences are also potential opportunities for energy-saving and CO2 emission reduction. The potential emission reductions in the power, iron and steel, and cement sectors alone are 2.7 GtCO2 per year in total. However, there are various barriers to technology diffusion. The barriers differ based on country, sector, size of company, and other factors. Removing the barriers is important and also presents opportunities for green growth. Barriers are very large in general, and therefore, high carbon prices are needed for deep emission reductions when explicit carbon prices, such as with carbon taxes and emission trading schemes, are adopted. However, the feasibility of introducing high carbon prices is very slim. Removing barriers by bottom-up measures is more useful and acceptable in the real world than a top-down approach, and such measures are expected to reduce emissions substantially.


Energy Efficiency Emission Reduction Energy Efficiency Improvement Payback Period Commercial Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. CEMBUREAU (2003) World cement directory 2002, vols. I and II. CEMBUREAU – The European Cement Association, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubin J (1992) Market barriers to conservation: are implicit discount rates too high?, Working Papers No. 802, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. ECCJ (2004) Report on investigations for diffusions of energy saving technologies. Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ). (in Japanese)
  4. EPA (2005) Interim report: New powertrain technologies and their projected costs, EPA420-R-05-012.
  5. Helm D, Smale R, Phillips J (2007) Too good to be true?: the UK’s climate change record. Accessed January 2009
  6. Homma T, Akimoto K, Tomoda T (2008) Evaluation of sectoral and regional CO2 emissions: production-based and consumption-based accounting measurements. In: GTAP Conference 2008 (11th Annual conference future of global economy), FinlandGoogle Scholar
  7. IEA (2007) Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emissions. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. IEA (2009) Energy technology transitions for industry – strategies for the next industrial revolution. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. IEA (2010a) Energy balances of OECD countries 2010 edition. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. IEA (2010b) Energy balances of non-OECD countries 2010 edition. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. IEA (2010c) CO2 emission from fuel combustion 2010 edition. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. IEA (2010d) Energy technology perspectives 2010. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. IEA (2011a) Energy balances of OECD countries 2011 edition. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. IEA (2011b) Energy balances of non-OECD countries 2011 edition. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. NEDO (2008) Basic study on energy conservation and environmental protection measures targeting the cement industry in India. FY2007, Commissioned to Taiheiyo Engineering Corporation (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Oda J, Akimoto K, Sano F, Tomoda T (2007) Diffusion of energy efficient technologies and CO2 emission reductions in iron and steel sector. Energy Econ 29:868–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oda J, Akimoto K, Tomoda T, Nagashima M, Wada K, Sano F (2012) International comparisons of energy efficiency in power, steel, and cement industries. Energy Policy 36(9):3477–3484Google Scholar
  18. RITE (2011) Report of project of the alternative pathways toward sustainable development and climate stabilization (ALPS). (in Japanese)
  19. Tanaka K (2008) Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy. Energy Policy 36:2887–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Train K (1985) Discount rates in consumers’ energy-related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy 10(12):1243–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wada K, Akimoto K, Sano F, Oda J, Homma T (2012) Energy-efficiency opportunities in the residential sector and their feasibility. Energy (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  22. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2005) CO2 accounting and reporting standard for the cement industry, The cement CO2 protocol, Ver. 2.0, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI).
  23. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2009) Cement industry energy and CO2 performance: getting the numbers right, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI), 2009.
  24. Worldsteel (2011) Steel statistical yearbook 2011, Worldsteel Committee on Economic Studies. World Steel Association, Brussels.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Systems Analysis Group, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE)Kizugawa-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations