Skip to main content

Origins of Quality Metrics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heart Failure

Abstract

The evidenced based health care (EBHC) movement has restructured the practice of medicine in recent decades. A direct result of this movement has been the trend of using evidence derived from clinical trials to develop best practice guidelines for clinical care. In recent years these guidelines have been at the forefront of an effort to improve outcomes and standardize care. A number of national organizations have led the effort to develop quality metrics thereby creating a heterogeneous landscape that at times contains redundancies. Nevertheless, recent trends have seen the gradual incorporation of heart failure quality metrics into “pay for performance” incentive schemes. The movement to broadly use heart failure quality metrics has not been without its limitations and challenges as collecting information to calculate quality metrics can be resource intensive and it is not entirely clear that tailoring care to satisfy these metrics results in consistently improved patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cochrane Community. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us/evidence-based-health-care (2014). Accessed 21 May 2015. Evidence based medicine tutorial. http://med.fsu.edu/index.cfm?page=medicalinformatics.ebmTutorial. Accessed 1 June 2015.

  3. Sackett DL. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Institute of Medicine- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 3rdrd printing. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Schmaltz SP, Wachter RM. Accountability measures — using measurement to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:683–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams SC, Schmaltz SP, Morton DJ, Koss RG, Loeb JM. Quality of care in U.S. hospitals as reflected by standardized measures, 2002–2004. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:255–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Committee for Quality Assurance. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/142/Default.aspx. Accessed 21 May 2015.

  8. Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, et al. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonow RO, Bennett S, Casey DE, et al. ACC/AHA clinical performance measures for adults with chronic heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Performance Measures) endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(6):1144–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donabedian A. Evaluating quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1996;44:166–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lohr KN, Schroeder SA. A strategy for quality assurance in medicare. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(10):707–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin HR. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. International J Qual Health Care. 2001;13(6):469–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thom T, American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2006 update. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Getting at the heart of the problem. In: Coming home to better care: 2007 annual report. 2007. http://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/Publications/Resource%20Library/Annual%20Report/NCQA_Annual_2007.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2015.

  15. Bonow RO, Ganiats TG, Beam CT, et al. ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association–Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(20):1812–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heart Failure Core Measure Set: The Joint Commission. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/Heart%20Failure.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2015.

  17. Facts About Disease Specific Care Certification: The Joint Commission. http://www.jointcommission.org/certification/diseasespecific_care.aspx (2014). Accessed 21 May 2015.

  18. Heart Failure: The Joint Commission. http://www.jointcommission.org/heart_failure/default.aspx (2015). Accessed 21 May 2015.

  19. NQF endorses cardiovascular measures: national quality forum. http://www.qualityforum.org/News_And_Resources/Press_Releases/2012/NQF_Endorses_Cardiovascular_Measures.aspx (2012). Accessed 21 May 2015.

  20. Scrutinio D, Passantino A, Ricci VA, Catanzaro R. Association between conformity with performance measures and 1-year postdischarge survival in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(2):160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazimba S, Grant N, Parikh A, Mwandia G, Makola D, Chilomo C, Redko C, Hahn HS. Heart failure performance measures: do they have an impact on 30-day readmission rates? Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(4):324–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller MR, Pronovost P, Donithan M, Zeger S, Zhan C, Morlock L, Meyer GS. Relationship between performance measurement and accreditation: implications for quality of care and patient safety. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20(5):239–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Compilation of the social security laws: official social security website. http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title18/1899.htm. Accessed 21 May 2015.

  24. Bundled payments for care improvement (BPCI) initiative: general information: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments. Accessed 21 May 2015.

  25. Loeb JM, Foster N. Process measures, outcome measures, and heart failure. JAMA. 2010;303(1):35–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Stough WG, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg BH, et al. Association between performance measures and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized with heart failure. JAMA. 2007;297(1):61–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schopfer DW, Whooley MA, Stamos TD. Hospital compliance with performance measures and 30-day outcomes in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2012;164(1):80–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard M. Julien MD, MPH .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Julien, H.M., Whellan, D.J. (2017). Origins of Quality Metrics. In: Eisen, H. (eds) Heart Failure. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4219-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4219-5_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4218-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4219-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics