Advertisement

Case Study II: Resource Management of Network Virtualization

  • Clarissa Cassales Marquezan
  • Lisandro  Zambenedetti Granville
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

Network virtualization is an emerging trend claimed to reduce the costs of future networks. The key strategy in network virtualization is of slicing physical resources (links, routers, servers, etc.) to create virtual networks composed of subsets of these slices. One important challenge is the resource management of the physical or substrate networks. Sophisticated management techniques should be used to accomplish such management. Self-management techniques rise as an appropriated alternative to address such a challenges on network virtualization. This chapter depicts the joint use of self-organizing property and P2P technique according to the principles of the Self-* P2P design in order to manage the substrate network resources. The concepts behind self-organizing P2P approach are presented as well as the network virtualization model considered in this work. Then the instantiation of the generic self-organizing P2P solution on the network virtualization environment is depicted, its implementation and summary evaluation of the solution are also described. An evaluation of the self-organizing P2P solution is discussed and the final remarks of this case study presented.

Keywords

Self-organizing P2P Design Cooperation Complementary perspectives Network virtualization Resource management 

References

  1. 1.
    4WARD: The fp7 4ward project (January 2010). http://www.4ward-project.eu/. Accessed in March 2012
  2. 2.
    Baldi, M.: Triple play support for the next generation internet. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium, 2006, NETWORKS 2006, pp. 1–7 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berl, A., Fischer, A., de Meer, H., Galis, A., Rubio-Loyola, J.: Management of virtual networks. In: Proceedings of Fourth IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on End-to-End Virtualization and Grid Management, EVGM 2008, pp. 197–202 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chowdhury, N.M.M.K., Boutaba, R.: Network virtualization: state of the art and research challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 47(7), 20–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Degrande, N., Laevens, K., Vleeschauwer, D.D., Sharpe, R.: Increasing the User Perceived Quality for IPTV Services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 46(2), 94–99 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott, C., Falk, A.: An update on the geni project. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 39(3), 28–34 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feamster, N., Gao, L., Rexford, J.: How to lease the internet in your spare time. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 37, 61–64 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunkel, M., Schneiders, M., Vorbeck, S., Weiershausen, W., Leppla, R., Rumpf, F., Herber, R., Furst, V., Rodenfels, M.: Aggregation networks: Cost comparison of WDM ring vs. double star topology. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling, 2008, ONDM 2008, pp. 1–5 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, S., Lisle, S., Nehib, G.: IPTV transport architecture alternatives and economic considerations. IEEE Commun. Mag. 46(2), 70–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hermann, K.: Self-organizing replica placement—a case study on emergence. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, 2007, SASO ’07, pp. 13–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marquezan, C.C., Brunner, M., Nunzi, G.: Transparent movement of virtual node through simple local low level monitoring. European Patent Application 08 021 429.9, Dec 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marquezan, C.C., Nunzi, G., Brunner, M., Granville, L.Z.: Distributed autonomic resource management for network virtualization. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS 2010), pp. 463–470 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muresano, R., Rexachs, D., Luque, E.: How spmd applications could be efficiently executed on multicore environments? In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops, 2009, CLUSTER ’09, pp. 1–4 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niebert, N., Khayat, I.E., Baucke, S., Keller, R., Rembarz, R., Sachs, J.: Network virtualization: a viable path towards the future internet. J. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 45(4), 511–520 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OMNET++: Welcome to the omnet++ community! (February 2010). http://www.omnetpp.org/. Accessed in March 2012

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clarissa Cassales Marquezan
    • 1
  • Lisandro  Zambenedetti Granville
    • 2
  1. 1.PalunoUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of InformaticsFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations