Advertisement

Case Study I: Reliability of Monitoring Platforms

  • Clarissa Cassales Marquezan
  • Lisandro  Zambenedetti Granville
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

Monitoring is essential in modern network management to identify problems in underlying communication infrastructures of modern organizations. However, current monitoring systems are unable to recover their internal faulty entities forcing the network administrator to manually fix the occasionally broken monitoring solution. This case study, therefore, address this issue by introducing a self-healing monitoring solution following the principles of Self-* P2P design. The proposed solution combines the availability and communication transparency provided by P2P-based overlays with self-healing properties following the principles proposed for the self-* P2P design. The solution here presented considers a scenario of a monitoring system for a Network Access Control (NAC) installation.

Keywords

Self-healing P2P Design Cooperation Management overlay Monitoring platform Crash fault Recovery Management services 

References

  1. 1.
    Aysal, T., Barner, K.: On the convergence of perturbed non-stationary consensus algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2009. The 28th Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 2132–2140 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benediktsson, J., Swain, P.: Consensus theoretic classification methods. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22(4), 688–704 (1992)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berns, A., Ghosh, S.: Dissecting self-* properties. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, 2009. SASO ’09, pp. 10–19 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding, X., Gu, Z., Shi, L., Hou, Y.: A failure detection model based on message delay prediction. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, 2009. GCC ’09, pp. 24–30 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foundation, A.S.: Welcome to apache axis2/java (February 2010). http://ws.apache.org/axis2/. Accessed March 2012
  6. 6.
    GPPD: Parallel and distributed processing group—GPPD (2008). http://gppd.inf.ufrgs.br/new/. Accessed March 2012
  7. 7.
    Izumi, T., Saitoh, A., Masuzawa, T.: Timed uniform consensus resilient to crash and timing faults. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2004, pp. 243–252 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kar, S., Moura, J.: Distributed consensus algorithms in sensor networks with imperfect communication: link failures and channel noise. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 57(1), 355–369 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    López, G., Cánovas, O., Gómez, A.F., Jiménez, J.D., Marín, R.: A network access control approach based on the AAA architecture and authorization attributes. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 30(3), 900–919 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marquezan, C.C., Panisson, A., Granville, L.Z., Nunzi, G., Brunner, M.: Maintenance of monitoring systems throughout self-healing mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 19th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, DSOM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5273, pp. 176–188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nobre, J.C., Granville, L.Z.: Consistency of states of management data in p2p-based autonomic network management. In: Proceedings of the 20th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, DSOM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5841, pp. 99–110. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J., Murray, R.: Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc. IEEE 95(1), 215–233 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panisson, A., Melchiors, C., Granville, L.Z., Almeida, M.J.B., Tarouco, L.M.R.: Designing the architecture of p2p-based network management systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC’06, pp. 69–75 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Panisson, A.: Aplicação de técnicas de distribuição de carga em sistemas de gerenciamento de redes baseados em p2p (2007), master thesis (In Portuguese). http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/11450. Accessed March 2012
  15. 15.
    Tanenbaum, A.S., Steen, M.V. (eds.): Distributed Systems—Principles and Designs, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clarissa Cassales Marquezan
    • 1
  • Lisandro  Zambenedetti Granville
    • 2
  1. 1.PalunoUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of InformaticsFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations