Telehealth Opportunities in Occupational Therapy

  • Jana CasonEmail author
  • Tammy Richmond
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


Presently, utilization of telehealth is in its infancy within the profession of occupational therapy. However, the occupational therapy profession is poised to benefit from integrating this service delivery model across multiple practice settings and practice areas. Potential benefits of using a telehealth service delivery model within occupational therapy include increased accessibility of services to clients who live in remote or underserved areas, improved access to providers and specialists otherwise unavailable to clients, prevention of unnecessary delays in receiving care, and decreased isolation for practitioners through distance learning, consultation, and research. This chapter examines telehealth terminology and technologies, potential applications of telehealth across six practice areas of occupational therapy, reimbursement considerations, and standards and guidelines to support implementation of a telehealth service delivery model within occupational therapy. Adoption of telehealth as a service delivery model within occupational therapy will depend on continued efforts to fund and research the implementation of telehealth technologies across all occupational therapy practice areas, which, in turn, will promote policy change that results in expanded reimbursement and sustainability.


Occupational Therapy Functional Electrical Stimulation Personal Health Record Service Delivery Model Early Intervention Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Administration on Aging. Aging statistics. 2010. Available at: Accessed 11 Feb 2011.
  2. 2.
    American Heart Association. Stroke statistics. 2011. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  3. 3.
    American Occupational Therapy Association. Living with Parkinson’s disease. 2007. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  4. 4.
    American Occupational Therapy Association. Obesity and occupational therapy position paper. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:701–3. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.6.701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy code of ethics and ethics standards. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:S17–26. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.64S17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Occupational Therapy Association. Standards of practice for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:S106–11. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.64S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Occupational Therapy Association. Telerehabilitation position paper. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:S92–102. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.64S92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Telemedicine Association. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. 2010. Available at: Accessed Feb 2011.
  9. 9.
    American Telemedicine Association. Telemedicine defined. 2011. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  10. 10.
    Baharav E, Reiser C. Using telepractice in parent training in early autism. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16:727–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bashshur R, Shannon G. National telemedicine initiatives: essential to healthcare reform. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:600–10. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.9960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bates D, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff. 2010;29(4):614–21. doi: 10.1377/hithall.2010.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bendixen R, Horn K, Levy C. Using telerehabilitation to support elders with chronic illness in their homes. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2007;23(1):47–51.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergquist TF, Thompson K, Gehl C, et al. Satisfaction ratings after receiving internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe acquired brain injury. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16:417–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biswas-Diener R. Personal coaching as a positive intervention. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:544–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burns RB, Crislip D, Daviou P, et al. Using telerehabilitation to support assistive technology. Assist Technol. 1998;10:126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    California Healthcare Foundation. Participatory health: online and mobile tools help chronically ill manage their care. 2009. Available at: Accessed 16 Dec 2010.
  18. 18.
    Cason J. A pilot telerehabilitation program: delivering early intervention services to rural families. Int J Telerehabil. 2009;1:29–37.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cason J. Telerehabilitation: an adjunct service delivery model for early intervention services. Int J Telerehabil. 2011;3(1):19–30. doi: 10.5195/ Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chumbler N, Quigley P, Sanford J, et al. Implementing telerehabilitation research for stroke rehabilitation with community dwelling veterans: lessons learned. Int J Telerehabil. 2010;2:15–2. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2010.6047.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clark P, Dawson S, Scheiderman-Miller C, et al. TeleRehab: stroke teletherapy and management using two-way interactive video. Neuroreport. 2002;26:87–93.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crossen-Sills J, Toomey I, Doherty ME. Technology and home care: implementing systems to enhance aging in place. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008;44:230–46.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, et al. Care coordination/hometelehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:1118–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DeVany M, Alverson D, D’Iorio J, et al. Employing telehealth to enhance overall quality of life and health for families. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:1003–7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Diamond B, Shreve G, Bonilla J, et al. Telerehabilitation, cognition and user-accessibility. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003;18:171–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dobke M, Bhavsar D, Gosman A, et al. Pilot trial of telemedicine as a decision aid for patients with chronic wounds. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:245–9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0038.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dreyer N, Dreyer K, Shaw D, et al. Efficacy of telemedicine in occupational therapy: a pilot study. J Allied Health. 2001;30(1):39–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eriksson L, Lindstrom B, Ekenberg L. Patient’s Experiences of telerehabilitation at home after shoulder joint replacement. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17:25–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Federal Communications Commission. Voice-over-Internet protocol. 2010. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  30. 30.
    Fischer H. U.S. military casualty statistics: operation new dawn, operation Iraqi freedom, and operation enduring freedom. 2010. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  31. 31.
    Fonda SJ, Bursell SE, Lewis DG, et al. The relationship of a diabetes telehealth eye care program to standard eye care and change in diabetes health outcomes. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:635–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foundation for Spinal Cord Injury Prevention, Care & Cure. Spinal cord injury statistics. 2009. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  33. 33.
    Gallagher TE. Augmentation of special-needs services and information to students and teachers “ASSIST”—a telehealth innovation providing school-based medical interventions. Hawaii Med J. 2004;63:300–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Germain V, Marchand A, Bouchard S, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy administered by videoconference for posttraumatic stress disorder. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(1):42–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Girard P. Military and VA telemedicine systems for patients with traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:1017–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Golomb MR, McDonald BC, Warden SJ, et al. In-home virtual reality videogame telerehabilitation in adolescents with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harada N, Dhanani S, Elrod M, et al. Feasibility study of home telerehabilitation for physically inactive veterans. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:465–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haugen HA, Tran ZV, Wyatt HR, et al. Using telehealth to increase participation in weight maintenance programs. Obesity. 2007;15:3067–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heimerl S, Rasch N. Delivering developmental occupational therapy consultation services through telehealth. Dev Disabil Spec Interest Sec Q. 2009;32(3):1–4.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hermann V, Herzog M, Jordan R, et al. Telerehabilitation and electrical stimulation: an occupation-based, client-centered stroke intervention. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoenig H, Sanford JA, Butterfield T, et al. Development of a teletechnology protocol for in-home rehabilitation. J Res Dev. 2006;43:287–98.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hoffman SW, Shesko K, Harrison CR. Enhanced neurohabilitation techniques in the DVBIC assisted living pilot project. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;26:257–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hoffman T, Russell T. Pre-admission orthopaedic occupational therapy home visits conducted using the internet. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hoffman T, Russell T, Cooke H. Remote measurement via the internet of upper limb range of motion people who have had a stroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:401–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hoffman T, Russell T, Thompson L, et al. Using the internet to assess activities of daily living and hand function in people with Parkinson’s disease. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23:253–61.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hoge C, Castro C, Messer S, et al. Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:13–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hori M, Kubota M, Kihara T, et al. The effect of videophone communication (with Skype and webcam) for elderly patients with dementia and their caregivers. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009;36S:36–8.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Huis in’t Veld R, Huijgen B, Schaake L, et al. Staged approach evaluation of remotely supervised myofeedback treatment (RSMT) in women with neck – shoulder pain due to computer work. Telemed E Health. 2008;14:545–51. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, et al. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:427–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kelso G, Fiechtl B, Olsen S, et al. The feasibility of virtual home visits to provide early intervention: a pilot study. Infants Young Children. 2009;22:332–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kim J, Brienza DM, Lynch RD, et al. Effectiveness evaluation of remote accessibility assessment system for wheelchair users using virtualized reality. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:470–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lai JC, Woo J, Hui E, et al. Telerehabilitation – a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10:199–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Monegain B. Henry Ford reduces hospital admissions with remote monitoring. 2009. Available at: Accessed 8 Feb2011.
  54. 54.
    Mozer E, Franklin B, Rose J. Psychotherapeutic intervention by telephone. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3:391–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    National Alliance for Caregiving. New study reveals family caregivers want web-based and mobile technologies to help them care for their loved ones. 2011. Available at: Accessed 11 Feb 2011.
  56. 56.
    National Council of Aging. Re-forming healthcare: Americans speak out about chronic conditions and the pursuit of health. 2009. Available at: Accessed 16 Dec 2010.
  57. 57.
    Nerenberg J. 500 million people to use mobile health Apps by 2015: mHealth study. 2010. Available at: Accessed 20 Jan 2010.
  58. 58.
    Neubeck L, Redfern J, Fernandez R, et al. Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16:281–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Palsbo SE, Dawson SJ, Savard L, et al. Televideo assessment using functional reach test and European stroke scale. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:659664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Parkinson’s Disease Foundation. Statistics on Parkinson’s. 2011. Available at: Accessed 5 Feb 2011.
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
    Philips VL, Temkin A, Vesmarovish S, et al. A feasibility study of video-based home telecare for clients with spinal cord injuries. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:120–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Reger GM, Holloway KM, Candy C, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy for active duty soldiers in a military mental health clinic. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(1):93–6. doi: 10.1002/jts.20574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Russell T, Buttrum P, Wooton R, et al. Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized control trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:113–20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sanford J, Hoenig H, Griffiths P, et al. A comparison of televideo and traditional in-home rehabilitation in mobility impaired older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2007;25(3):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Scheideman-Miller C. Rehabilitation. In: Stamm BH, Lauderdale D, Post M, et al., editors, Telemedicine technical assistance documents, p. 241–66. 2004. Available at: Accessed 11 Feb 2011.
  68. 68.
    Schein RM, Schmeler MR, Brienza D, et al. Development of a service delivery protocol used for remote wheelchair consultation via telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:932–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schmeler M, Schein R, McCue M, et al. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil. 2008;1:12–24.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Simmons S, Alverson D, Poropatich R, et al. Applying telehealth in natural and anthropogenic disasters. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:968–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Slootmaker SM, Chinapaw MJ, Seidell JC, et al. Accelerometers and internet for physical activity promotion in youth? Feasibility and effectiveness of a minimal intervention. Prev Med. 2010;51(1):31–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Soopramanien A, Pain H, Stainthrope A, et al. Using telemedicine to provide post-discharge support for patients with spinal cord injuries. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11 Suppl 1:68–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Suter P, Suter WN, Johnston D. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Popul Health Manag. 2011;14(2):87–92. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tam SF, Man WK, Hui-Chan CW, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of Tele-cognitive rehabilitation for functional performance in three case studies. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10(1):20–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Taylor D, Cameron J, Walch L, et al. Exploring the feasibility of videoconference delivery of a self-management program to rural participants with stroke. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:646–54. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tsuchisawa K, Ono K, Kanda T. Japanese occupational therapy in community mental health and telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6 Suppl 2:79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tuerk PW, Yoder M, Ruggiero KJ, et al. A pilot study of prolonged exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder delivered via telehealth technology. J Trauma Stress. 2010;23(1):116–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wu G, Keyes LM. Group Tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12:561–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Vismara L, Young G, Stahmer A, et al. Dissemination of evidence-based practice: can we train therapists from a distance? J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:1636–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wise M, Gustafson DH, Sorkness CA, et al. Internet telehealth for pediatric asthma case management: integrating computerized and case manager features for tailoring a web-based asthma education program. Health Promot Pract. 2007;8:282–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    World Health Organization & World Bank. World report on disability. 2011. Retrieved from: Accessed Feb 9, 2012

Additional Resources

  1. American Physical Therapy Association. Position on telehealth. Available at:
  2. American Occupational Therapy Association. Position paper on telerehabilitation. Available at:
  3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Position statement on telepractice. Available at:
  4. American Telemedicine Association. Available at:
  5. American Telemedicine Association. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. Available at:; also available at:
  6. Association of Telemedicine Service Providers. Available at:
  7. Center for Telehealth and E-Health Law (CTel). Available at:
  8. Center for Telemedicine Law. Available at:
  9. Federal Telemedicine Gateway. Available at:
  10. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. Available at:
  11. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. Available at:
  12. Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Telerehabilitation. Available at:
  13. Telemedicine and e-Health. Available at:
  14. UC Davis Telemedicine Program. Available at:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auerbach School of Occupational TherapySpalding UniversityLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Go 2 Care, Inc.Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations