To understand the current problems that surround maritime governance our first step must be to assess the substantive developments that have occurred in the context for the maritime (and wider) world by examining what went before. This is represented by Modernism. The main features of today's maritime governance was formulated during this time.


Instrumental Rationality Governance Framework Policy Failure Maritime Policy Iron Cage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adams, R. M. (1978). What was modernism? Hudson Review, 31, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aglietta, M. (1982). World capitalism in the eighties. New Left Review, 136(1), 3–41.Google Scholar
  3. Albertson, N. (1988). Postmodernism, post-Fordism and critical social theory. Environment and Planning D, 6, 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alfven, H. (1983). On hierarchical cosmology. Astrophysics and Space Science, 89, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, R. E. (2006). Plato: The republic. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, P. (1984). Modernity and revolution. New Left Review, 144, 96–113.Google Scholar
  7. Arrighi, G. (1994). The long Twentieth Century. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Ascher, W., & Ascher, B. H. (2004). Linking Lasswell’s political psychology and the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 37(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), 154–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ballard, J. G. (2006). A handful of dust, Guardian, March 20th.Google Scholar
  11. Baudrillard, J. (1975). The mirror of production. St Louis MO: Telos Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bendix, R. (1960). Max Weber: An intellectual portrait. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  14. Benko, G. (1997). Introduction: Modernity, postmodernity and the social sciences. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 1–48). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berman, M. (1982). All that’s solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Bertens, H. (1995). The idea of the postmodern, a history. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Birnbaum, N. (1969). The crisis of industrial society. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Birnbaum, N. (1971). Towards a critical sociology. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Boje, D. M., & Dennehy, R. F. (1993). Managing in the postmodern world; America’s revolution against exploitation. Kendall/Hunt: Dubuque IA.Google Scholar
  21. Boje, D. M., Fitzgibbon, D. E., & Steingard, D. S. (1996). Storytelling at Administrative Science Quarterly: Warding off the postmodern barbarians. In D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart Jr, & T. J. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organization theory (pp. 60–92). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Borzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon—On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Braudel, F. (1982). The wheels of commerce. NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  24. Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28(1), 39–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Burke, B. (2000). Post-modernism and Post-Modernity. The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education.
  26. Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 4: The contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 15(1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Caporaso, J. A. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern? Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carroll, W. K. (2002). Does disorganized capitalism disorganize corporate networks? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(3), 339–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  31. Chlomoudis, C.I., Karalis, A.V., Pallis, A.A. (2000). Transition to a New Reality: Theorising the Organizational Restructuring of Ports. Infomare, International Workshop, Special Interest Group on Maritime Transport and Ports, Genoa, June 8–10.Google Scholar
  32. Clegg, S. R. (1990). Modern organizations, organization studies in the postmodern world. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Clegg, S. R. (1996). Postmodern management. In G. Palmer & S. Clegg (Eds.), Constituting management. Markets, meanings and identities (pp. 235–265). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Clegg, S. R., & Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, class and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Comte, A. (2005). Positive philosophy of Auguste Comte Part I. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Cooke, P. (1990). Back to the future. Modernity, postmodernity and locality. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  37. Cooper, R. (2000). The post-modern state and the world order. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  38. Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 9(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cornforth, M. (1952). Dialectical materialism. An introduction. Volume 1: Materialism and the dialectical method, Lawrence and Wishart: London.Google Scholar
  40. Crook, S., Paluski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Curry, M. R. (1991). Postmodernism, language and the strains of modernism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 210–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Davies, J. S. (2005). Local governance and the dialectics of hierarchy, market and network. Policy Studies, 26(3/4), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dear, M. J. (1986). Postmodernism and planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dear, M. J. (1991). Book review: The condition of postmodernity: An inquiry into the origins of cultural change, David Harvey. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 533–539.Google Scholar
  45. Denzer, A.S. (undated). Masters of modernism.
  46. Denzin, N. K. (1986). Postmodern social theory. Sociological Theory, 4, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labour markets and manpower analysis. Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar
  48. Duncan, J., & Ley, D. (1982). Structural Marxism and human geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 533–539.Google Scholar
  49. Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. Oxford: Oxford Classics.Google Scholar
  50. Eagleton, T. (1985). Capitalism, Modernism and Postmodernism. New Left Review, I(152), 60–73.Google Scholar
  51. Evans, M. (2001). Understanding dialectics in policy network analysis. Political Studies, 49, 542–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Falk, R. (1996). An enquiry into the political economy of world order. New Political Economy, 1, 13–26.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Fichte, J. (1998). Early philosophical writings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Floud, J. (1992a). Jurgen Habermas; Social Structure and the Limits of the Law, Radcliffe Lecture, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  55. Floud, J. (1992b). Law and Society in a Welfare State, Radcliffe Lecture, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  56. George, J. (1996). Understanding international relations after the Cold War: Probing beyond the British legacy. In M. J. Shapiro & H. R. Alker (Eds.), Challenging boundaries: Global flows, territorial identities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  57. Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkerry, T. J. (2004). Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(2), 228–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Giddens, A. (1981). Modernism and postmodernism. New German Critique, 22, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Giddens, A. (1985). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Volume 2. The Nation-state and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  60. Godelier, M. (1972). Structure and contradiction in capital. In R. Blackburn (Ed.), Ideology in social science (pp. 334–368). NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  61. Goldman, L. (1969). The human sciences and philosophy. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  62. Gould, P. (1988). The only perspective: A critique of Marxist claims to exclusiveness in geographical enquiry. In R. Golledge, H. Couclelis, & P. Gould (Eds.), A ground for common search (pp. 1–10). Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Geographical Press.Google Scholar
  63. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. NY: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  65. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  66. Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  67. Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, 22, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Habermas, J. (1983). Modernity—An incomplete project. In T. Docherty (Ed.), Postmodernism: A reader (pp. 98–109). Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  69. Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  71. Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Hirschman, A. O., & Lindblom, C. E. (1962). Economic development, research and development, policy-making, some emergent views. Behavioral Science, 7, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ingold, T. (1995). Man, the story so far, Times Higher Education Supplement, June 2nd, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  75. Jameson, F. (1971). Marxism and form: Twentieth Century dialectical theories of literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–92.Google Scholar
  77. Jameson, F. (1985). Postmodernism and consumer society. In H. Foster (Ed.), Postmodern culture (pp. 111–125). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  78. Jencks, C. (1986). What is post-modernism? London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
  79. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jowitt, K. (1992). New world disorder. The Leninist extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  81. Kimball, R. (1994). The Two Cultures today, on the C. P. Snow–F. R. Leavis controversy. The New Criterion, 12 Feb.Google Scholar
  82. King, R., & Kendall, G. (2004). The state, democracy and globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  83. Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  87. Le Corbusier. (1978). The city of tomorrow. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  88. Lefebvre, H. (1968). Dialectical materialism. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  89. Lefebvre, H. (1971). Everyday life in the modern world. NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  90. Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  91. Lipietz, A. (1996). The next transformation. In M. Cangiani (Ed.), The Milano papers: Essays in societal alternatives. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  92. Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government, Anonymous Publisher.Google Scholar
  93. Lourenco, S. A., & Glidewell, J. C. (1975). A dialectical analysis of organizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 489–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lukacs, G. (1971). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  95. Luke, T. W. (1991). The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait. Alternatives, 16, 315–344.Google Scholar
  96. Mandel, E. (1975). Late capitalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  97. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Markovic, M. (1974). From affluence to praxis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  99. Marsh, D. (1995). State theory and the policy network model, Paper 102, University of Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  100. Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Marx, K. (1992). Das Kapital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  102. Mayntz, R. (1976). Conceptual models of organizational decision-making and their application to the policy process. In G. Hofstede & S. Kassem (Eds.), European contribution to organization theory (pp. 114–125). Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  103. McLennan, G. (1995). Pluralism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Meisel, J. H. (1951). The genesis of Georges Sorel. Ann Arbor: Wahr.Google Scholar
  105. Mittelman, J. H. (1999). Rethinking the ‘New Regionalism’ in the context of globalization. In J. Hettne, A. Inotai, & O. Sunkel (Eds.), Globalism and the new regionalism, new regionalism series (Vol. 1, pp. 25–53). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  106. Mommsen, W. J. (1984). Max Weber and German politics 1890–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  107. Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  108. Negri, A. (2005). Postmodern global governance and the critical legal project. Law and Critique, 16, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Neyer, J. (2003). Discourse and order in the EU: A deliberative approach to multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(4), 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Nooteboom, B. (1992). A postmodern philosophy of markets. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 53–76.Google Scholar
  111. Norcliffe, G., Bassett, K., & Hoare, T. (1996). The emergence of postmodernism on the urban waterfront. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Norman, R. (1976). Hegel’s phenomenology. A philosophical introduction. Brighton: Sussex University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Norris, C. (1995). Versions of apocalypse: Kant, Derida, Foucault. In M. Bull (Ed.), Apocalypse theory and the ends of the world (pp. 227–249). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  114. Onuf, N. (1991). Sovereignty: Outline of a contemporary history. Alternatives, 16(4), 425–446.Google Scholar
  115. Opello, W. C., Jr, & Rosow, S. J. (2004). The nation-state and global order: A historical introduction to contemporary politics. Lynne Reinner: Boulder CO.Google Scholar
  116. Palmerston, 3rd Viscount (Henry Temple) (1848). Speech to the House of Commons, 1st March, Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates. 3rd series, vol. 97, col. 122.Google Scholar
  117. Parker, M. (1992). Post-modern organizations or postmodern organization theory? Organization Studies, 13(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  119. Peukert, D. (1989). The Weimar Republic. NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  120. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  121. Portoghesi, P. (1983). Postmodern: The architecture of the Postindustrial society. NY: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  122. Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Pusey, M. (Ed.). (1987). Jurgen Habermas. London: Ellis Horwood/Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar
  124. Rasmussen, D. (Ed.). (1990). Reading Habermas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  125. Reid, D. (1992). Sex, death and God in LA, death and God in LA. Berkeley: University of California Los Angeles Press.Google Scholar
  126. Relph, E. (1987). The modern urban landscape. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Robertson, R., & Lechner, F. (1985). Modernization, globalization and the problem of culture in World Systems Theory. Theory Culture and Society, 2(3), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Rosenau, J. N. (1997). The complexities and contradictions of globalization. Current History, 96, 360–364.Google Scholar
  129. Rosenau, J. N. (2000). The governance of Fragmegration: Neither a world republic nor a global interstate system. Quebec: Congress of the International Political Sciences Association.Google Scholar
  130. Rudd, K. (2001). Globalization and regional governance. In C. Sheil (Ed.), Globalization: Australian impacts. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  131. Ruggie, J. G. (2003). The United Nations and globalization: Patterns and limits of institutional adaptation. Global Governance, 9, 301–321.Google Scholar
  132. Sampson, A. (1995). Company man: The rise and fall of company life. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  133. Schoenberger, E. (1988). From Fordism to flexible accumulation: Technology, competitive strategies, and international location. Environment and Planning D, 6, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies; the reassertion of space in critical social theory. NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  135. Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  136. Soll, I. (1969). An introduction to Hegel’s Metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  137. Sombart, W. (1913a). Krieg und Kapitalismus. Duncker und Humblot: Munchen.Google Scholar
  138. Sombart, W. (1913b). Luxus und Kapitalismus. Duncker und Humblot: Munchen.Google Scholar
  139. Sorel, G. (1908). Les Illusions du Progress, translated as The Illusions of Progress by John and Charlotte Stanley. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  140. Spencer, H. (1851). Social statics. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
  141. Steingard, D. S., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1993). A postmodern deconstruction of total quality management (TQM). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6(5), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Stoker, G. (2004). Transforming local governance: From Thatcherism to new labour. Palgrave: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  143. Swenson, J. (2000). On Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  144. Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  145. Taylor, M. J., & Thrift, N. J. (1982). Models of corporate development and the multinational corporation. In M. J. Taylor & N. J. Thrift (Eds.), The geography of multinationals (pp. 14–32). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  146. Thompson, C. J. (1993). Modern truth and postmodern incredulity: A hermeneutic deconstruction of the metanarrative of “scientific truth” in marketing research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Thomson, P., & Sachs, G. (Eds.). (1994). The Cambridge companion to Brecht, Cambridge companions to literature series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  148. Thrift, N. J. (1991). For a new regional geography 2. Progress in Human Geography, 15, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Thrift, N. J. (1997). The rise of soft capitalism. Cultural Values, 1(1), 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Thurman, A. (1937). The folklore of capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  151. Van de Loo, B., &Van de Velde, S. (2003). Key Success Factors for Positioning Small-Island Sea Ports for Competitive Advantage, Faculteit der Bedrifskunde/Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  152. Van Ham, P. (2001). European integration and the postmodern condition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  153. Vattimo, G. (1988). The end of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  154. Virilio, P. (1999) Indirect light: extracted from Polar inertia. Theory, Culture and Society, 16 (5–6), 57–70.Google Scholar
  155. Warf, B. (1993). Postmodernism and the localities debate: Ontological questions and epistemological implications. Tijds. voor Econ. En Soc. Geog., 84(3), 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  157. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society; an outline of interpretative sociology (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  158. Weisskopf, V. F. (1981). Frontiers and limits of physical sciences. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 35, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Whyte, W. H. (1957). The organization man. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  160. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the Animal and the Machine. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  161. Williams, R. (1989). When was modernism? New Left Review, 175(1), 48–53.Google Scholar
  162. Wood, E. M. (1997). Modernity, postmodernity or capitalism? Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  164. Zurn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation-state; the EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 183–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, Plymouth Business SchoolPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations