Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modernism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maritime Governance and Policy-Making

  • 1535 Accesses

Abstract

To understand the current problems that surround maritime governance our first step must be to assess the substantive developments that have occurred in the context for the maritime (and wider) world by examining what went before. This is represented by Modernism. The main features of today's maritime governance was formulated during this time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R. M. (1978). What was modernism? Hudson Review, 31, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, M. (1982). World capitalism in the eighties. New Left Review, 136(1), 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertson, N. (1988). Postmodernism, post-Fordism and critical social theory. Environment and Planning D, 6, 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfven, H. (1983). On hierarchical cosmology. Astrophysics and Space Science, 89, 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. E. (2006). Plato: The republic. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1984). Modernity and revolution. New Left Review, 144, 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long Twentieth Century. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W., & Ascher, B. H. (2004). Linking Lasswell’s political psychology and the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 37(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), 154–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, J. G. (2006). A handful of dust, Guardian, March 20th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1975). The mirror of production. St Louis MO: Telos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1960). Max Weber: An intellectual portrait. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benko, G. (1997). Introduction: Modernity, postmodernity and the social sciences. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 1–48). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. (1982). All that’s solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertens, H. (1995). The idea of the postmodern, a history. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, N. (1969). The crisis of industrial society. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, N. (1971). Towards a critical sociology. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., & Dennehy, R. F. (1993). Managing in the postmodern world; America’s revolution against exploitation. Kendall/Hunt: Dubuque IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., Fitzgibbon, D. E., & Steingard, D. S. (1996). Storytelling at Administrative Science Quarterly: Warding off the postmodern barbarians. In D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart Jr, & T. J. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organization theory (pp. 60–92). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon—On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76, 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1982). The wheels of commerce. NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28(1), 39–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, B. (2000). Post-modernism and Post-Modernity. The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education. www.infed.org/biblio/b-postmd.htm.

  • Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 4: The contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 15(1), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern? Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. K. (2002). Does disorganized capitalism disorganize corporate networks? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(3), 339–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chlomoudis, C.I., Karalis, A.V., Pallis, A.A. (2000). Transition to a New Reality: Theorising the Organizational Restructuring of Ports. Infomare, International Workshop, Special Interest Group on Maritime Transport and Ports, Genoa, June 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R. (1990). Modern organizations, organization studies in the postmodern world. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R. (1996). Postmodern management. In G. Palmer & S. Clegg (Eds.), Constituting management. Markets, meanings and identities (pp. 235–265). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R., & Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, class and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (2005). Positive philosophy of Auguste Comte Part I. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1990). Back to the future. Modernity, postmodernity and locality. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2000). The post-modern state and the world order. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 9(1), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, M. (1952). Dialectical materialism. An introduction. Volume 1: Materialism and the dialectical method, Lawrence and Wishart: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, S., Paluski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, M. R. (1991). Postmodernism, language and the strains of modernism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. S. (2005). Local governance and the dialectics of hierarchy, market and network. Policy Studies, 26(3/4), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J. (1986). Postmodernism and planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J. (1991). Book review: The condition of postmodernity: An inquiry into the origins of cultural change, David Harvey. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzer, A.S. (undated). Masters of modernism. www.mastersofmodernism.com.

  • Denzin, N. K. (1986). Postmodern social theory. Sociological Theory, 4, 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labour markets and manpower analysis. Lexington: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Ley, D. (1982). Structural Marxism and human geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. Oxford: Oxford Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1985). Capitalism, Modernism and Postmodernism. New Left Review, I(152), 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2001). Understanding dialectics in policy network analysis. Political Studies, 49, 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1996). An enquiry into the political economy of world order. New Political Economy, 1, 13–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, J. (1998). Early philosophical writings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floud, J. (1992a). Jurgen Habermas; Social Structure and the Limits of the Law, Radcliffe Lecture, University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floud, J. (1992b). Law and Society in a Welfare State, Radcliffe Lecture, University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. (1996). Understanding international relations after the Cold War: Probing beyond the British legacy. In M. J. Shapiro & H. R. Alker (Eds.), Challenging boundaries: Global flows, territorial identities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkerry, T. J. (2004). Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(2), 228–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). Modernism and postmodernism. New German Critique, 22, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1985). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Volume 2. The Nation-state and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (1972). Structure and contradiction in capital. In R. Blackburn (Ed.), Ideology in social science (pp. 334–368). NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, L. (1969). The human sciences and philosophy. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P. (1988). The only perspective: A critique of Marxist claims to exclusiveness in geographical enquiry. In R. Golledge, H. Couclelis, & P. Gould (Eds.), A ground for common search (pp. 1–10). Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Geographical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. NY: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, 22, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1983). Modernity—An incomplete project. In T. Docherty (Ed.), Postmodernism: A reader (pp. 98–109). Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O., & Lindblom, C. E. (1962). Economic development, research and development, policy-making, some emergent views. Behavioral Science, 7, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1995). Man, the story so far, Times Higher Education Supplement, June 2nd, pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1971). Marxism and form: Twentieth Century dialectical theories of literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1985). Postmodernism and consumer society. In H. Foster (Ed.), Postmodern culture (pp. 111–125). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1986). What is post-modernism? London: Academy Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowitt, K. (1992). New world disorder. The Leninist extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, R. (1994). The Two Cultures today, on the C. P. Snow–F. R. Leavis controversy. The New Criterion, 12 Feb.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Kendall, G. (2004). The state, democracy and globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Corbusier. (1978). The city of tomorrow. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1968). Dialectical materialism. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1971). Everyday life in the modern world. NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1996). The next transformation. In M. Cangiani (Ed.), The Milano papers: Essays in societal alternatives. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government, Anonymous Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourenco, S. A., & Glidewell, J. C. (1975). A dialectical analysis of organizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 489–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, G. (1971). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. W. (1991). The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait. Alternatives, 16, 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. (1975). Late capitalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovic, M. (1974). From affluence to praxis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (1995). State theory and the policy network model, Paper 102, University of Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1992). Das Kapital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (1976). Conceptual models of organizational decision-making and their application to the policy process. In G. Hofstede & S. Kassem (Eds.), European contribution to organization theory (pp. 114–125). Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, G. (1995). Pluralism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J. H. (1951). The genesis of Georges Sorel. Ann Arbor: Wahr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, J. H. (1999). Rethinking the ‘New Regionalism’ in the context of globalization. In J. Hettne, A. Inotai, & O. Sunkel (Eds.), Globalism and the new regionalism, new regionalism series (Vol. 1, pp. 25–53). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mommsen, W. J. (1984). Max Weber and German politics 1890–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. (2005). Postmodern global governance and the critical legal project. Law and Critique, 16, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, J. (2003). Discourse and order in the EU: A deliberative approach to multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(4), 687–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1992). A postmodern philosophy of markets. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcliffe, G., Bassett, K., & Hoare, T. (1996). The emergence of postmodernism on the urban waterfront. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. (1976). Hegel’s phenomenology. A philosophical introduction. Brighton: Sussex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1995). Versions of apocalypse: Kant, Derida, Foucault. In M. Bull (Ed.), Apocalypse theory and the ends of the world (pp. 227–249). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. (1991). Sovereignty: Outline of a contemporary history. Alternatives, 16(4), 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opello, W. C., Jr, & Rosow, S. J. (2004). The nation-state and global order: A historical introduction to contemporary politics. Lynne Reinner: Boulder CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmerston, 3rd Viscount (Henry Temple) (1848). Speech to the House of Commons, 1st March, Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates. 3rd series, vol. 97, col. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (1992). Post-modern organizations or postmodern organization theory? Organization Studies, 13(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peukert, D. (1989). The Weimar Republic. NY: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portoghesi, P. (1983). Postmodern: The architecture of the Postindustrial society. NY: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (Ed.). (1987). Jurgen Habermas. London: Ellis Horwood/Tavistock/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, D. (Ed.). (1990). Reading Habermas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. (1992). Sex, death and God in LA, death and God in LA. Berkeley: University of California Los Angeles Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1987). The modern urban landscape. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R., & Lechner, F. (1985). Modernization, globalization and the problem of culture in World Systems Theory. Theory Culture and Society, 2(3), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1997). The complexities and contradictions of globalization. Current History, 96, 360–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2000). The governance of Fragmegration: Neither a world republic nor a global interstate system. Quebec: Congress of the International Political Sciences Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, K. (2001). Globalization and regional governance. In C. Sheil (Ed.), Globalization: Australian impacts. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2003). The United Nations and globalization: Patterns and limits of institutional adaptation. Global Governance, 9, 301–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (1995). Company man: The rise and fall of company life. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberger, E. (1988). From Fordism to flexible accumulation: Technology, competitive strategies, and international location. Environment and Planning D, 6, 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies; the reassertion of space in critical social theory. NY: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soll, I. (1969). An introduction to Hegel’s Metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, W. (1913a). Krieg und Kapitalismus. Duncker und Humblot: Munchen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, W. (1913b). Luxus und Kapitalismus. Duncker und Humblot: Munchen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorel, G. (1908). Les Illusions du Progress, translated as The Illusions of Progress by John and Charlotte Stanley. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1851). Social statics. London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingard, D. S., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1993). A postmodern deconstruction of total quality management (TQM). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6(5), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2004). Transforming local governance: From Thatcherism to new labour. Palgrave: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, J. (2000). On Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J., & Thrift, N. J. (1982). Models of corporate development and the multinational corporation. In M. J. Taylor & N. J. Thrift (Eds.), The geography of multinationals (pp. 14–32). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J. (1993). Modern truth and postmodern incredulity: A hermeneutic deconstruction of the metanarrative of “scientific truth” in marketing research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P., & Sachs, G. (Eds.). (1994). The Cambridge companion to Brecht, Cambridge companions to literature series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J. (1991). For a new regional geography 2. Progress in Human Geography, 15, 456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J. (1997). The rise of soft capitalism. Cultural Values, 1(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, A. (1937). The folklore of capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Loo, B., &Van de Velde, S. (2003). Key Success Factors for Positioning Small-Island Sea Ports for Competitive Advantage, Faculteit der Bedrifskunde/Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham, P. (2001). European integration and the postmodern condition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1988). The end of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1999) Indirect light: extracted from Polar inertia. Theory, Culture and Society, 16 (5–6), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (1993). Postmodernism and the localities debate: Ontological questions and epistemological implications. Tijds. voor Econ. En Soc. Geog., 84(3), 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society; an outline of interpretative sociology (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopf, V. F. (1981). Frontiers and limits of physical sciences. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 35, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. (1957). The organization man. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the Animal and the Machine. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1989). When was modernism? New Left Review, 175(1), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (1997). Modernity, postmodernity or capitalism? Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation-state; the EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 183–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Plymouth Business School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Michael Roe

Authors
  1. Michael Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2013). Modernism . In: Maritime Governance and Policy-Making. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4153-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation