Skip to main content

The Nation-State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maritime Governance and Policy-Making
  • 1628 Accesses

Abstract

The significance of the nation-state to maritime governance is discussed. The future of the nation is central to this discussion and the changing position it has to play in existing hierarchical maritime governance and policy making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aalberts, T. E. (2004). The future of sovereignty in multilevel governance Europe—a constructivist reading. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. (1988). Geo-politics: Re-visioning world politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. (1999). Mapping political power beyond state boundaries: Territory, identity, and movement in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28(3), 499–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamgir, J. (1999). Globalization and state capacity. International Studies Review, 1(1), 110–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrow, M. (1996). The global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderton, T., & Winchester, N. (2002). Globalization and de-regulation in the maritime industry. Marine Policy, 26, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (1997). On the number and size of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1027–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (1997). Placing globalization. Theory, Culture and Society, 14, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (1998). Globalization and regional development: A relational perspective. Competition and Change, 3, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning A, 34, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1996a). The shifting stage of politics: New medieval and postmodern territorialities? Environment and Planning D, 14, 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (1996b). Frontiers: Territory and state formation in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. (1988). Postmodernism and politics. In A. Ross (Ed.), Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism (pp. 46–62). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), 154–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtmann, R. (2004). The state of the state: The model of the modern state and its contemporary transformation. International Political Science Review, 25(3), 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2001). Domestic policies, national sovereignty and international economic institutions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 519–562.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bairoch, P., & Kozul-Wright, R. (1996). Globalization myths: Some historical reflections on integration, industrialization and growth in the world economy. UNCTAD discussion paper no. 113, UNCTAD, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, J., & Cronin, B. (1994). The state and the nation: changing norms and rules of sovereignty in international relations. International Organization, 48, 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 1–55). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1997). What is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1988). Previewing planet earth in 2013. Washington Post, 3(6), 48 (January 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors: enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., & Eberlein, B. (1999). The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S., & Dore, R. (Eds.). (1996). National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, T., & Weber, C. (Eds.). (1996). State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biger, G. (Ed.). (1995). The encyclopaedia of international boundaries. Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, G. H., & Schofield, R. N. (Eds.). (1987). Boundaries and state territory in the Middle East and North Africa. Wisbech: Menas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, D. L., & Inayatullah, N. (2000). The Westphalian deferral. International Studies Review, 2(2), 29–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. K. (2001). Debordering the world of states: Towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from Border Regions. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 175–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: Institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance, 16(4), 503–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1982). The wheels of commerce. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. Public Culture, 10(1), 135–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16(4), 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28(1), 39–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. (1973). World without borders. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1997). Globalization and the state. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (1997). Understanding international relations. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. (1983). Domestic politics and European community policy-making. Journal of Common Market Studies, XXI(4), 349–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, K. (1994). The properties of the state system and global capitalism. In S. Rosow, N. Inayatullah, & M. Rupert (Eds.), The global economy as political space (pp. 37–59). London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, K. (2000). Changing the rules: Reconceiving change in the Westphalian system. International Studies Review, 2(2), 181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, V. (1995). The diminished nation-state: A study in the loss of economic power. Daedalus, 124, 23–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, J. A. (1990). Rethinking sovereignty in a shrinking, fragmented world. In R. B. J. Walker & S. Mendlovitz (Eds.), Contending sovereignties: Redefining political community (pp. 13–44). Boulder: Lynne Reiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, J. A., & Falk, J. (1992). The end of sovereignty? The politics of a shrinking and fragmenting world. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern? Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (2000). Changes in the Westphalian order: Territory, public authority and sovereignty. International Studies Review, 2(2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (1996). International finance and the erosion of state policy capacity. In P. Gummett (Ed.), Globalization and public policy capacity (pp. 83–104). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, K. (2006). Interrogating “newness”. Globalization and postcolonial theory in the age of endless war. Cultural Critique, 62, 126–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T., & Jorgensen, K. E. (2000). Transnational governance ‘above’ and ‘below’ the state: The changing nature of borders in the new Europe. Regional and Federal Studies, 10(2), 62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L., & Dear, M. (1984). State apparatus, structures and language of legitimacy. Boston: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. S. (2001). Globalization and the boundaries of the state: A framework for analysing the changing practice of sovereignty. Governance, 14(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coicaud, J.-M. (2001). Reflections on international organizations and international legitimacy: Constraints, pathologies, and possibilities. International Social Science Journal, 170, 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, W. (1978). A nation is a nation, is a state, is an ethnic group, is a…. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1, 378–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2000). The post-modern state and the world order. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1993). The local and the global in the new urban politics. Environment and Planning D, 11(4), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, S. L. (2003). Perpetual imagining. Nationhood in a global era. International Studies Review, 5, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. D., & Rees-Mogg, W. (1999). The sovereign individual: Mastering the transition to the information age. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Senarclens, P. (1998). Governance and the crisis in the international mechanisms of regulation. International Social Science Journal, 50(55), 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Senarclens, P. (2001). International organizations and the challenges of globalization. International Social Science Journal, 170, 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vivero, J. L. S., Mateos, J. C. R., & del Corral, D. F. (2009). Geopolitical factors of maritime policies and marine spatial planning: state, regions and geographical planning scope. Marine Policy, 13, 624–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J., & Clark, G. (1978). The state and geographic process: a critical review. Environment and Planning A, 10, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearlove, J. (2000). Globalization and the study of British politics. Politics, 20(2), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, F. (2002). Governance beyond the nation-state. Reflections on the democratic deficit of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 256–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Rosso, Jr., S. J. (1995). The insecure state (What future for the state?). Daedalus, 124(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1966). Nationalism and social communication. New York: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1981). The crisis of the state. Government and Opposition, 16, 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (1994). Global-local tensions: Firms and states in the global space-economy. Economic Geography, 70(2), 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (1998). Global shift: Transforming the world economy. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, W. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K.-J. (1994). Geopolitics and foreign policy: Recent developments in Anglo-American political geography and international relations. Progress in Human Geography, 18, 186–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnan, H., & Wilson, T.-M. (1994). An anthropology of frontiers. In H. Donnan & T.-M. Wilson (Eds.), Border approaches: Anthropological perspectives on frontiers. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, P. N., Keller, W. W., Pauly, L. W., & Reich, S. (1998). The myth of the global corporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drache, D. (1996). From Keynes to K-mart: Competitiveness in a corporate age. In R. Boyer & D. Drache (Eds.), States against markets: The limits of globalization (pp. 31–61). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1997). The global economy and the nation-state. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 159–171. (September/October).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchacek, I. D. (1988). Multi-communal and bi-communal polities. In I. D. Duchachek, D. Latouche, & G. Stevenson (Eds.), Perforated sovereignties and international relations (pp. 3–28). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S., & Savage, M. (1989). Space, scale and locality. Antipode, 21(3), 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (1995, October 7). The Myth of the Powerless State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1971). The evolution of physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Anderson, G. (Ed.). (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1997). The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Politics, 50(1), 62–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1996). An enquiry into the political economy of world order. New Political Economy, 1, 13–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1997). State of siege: Will globalization win out? International Affairs, 73(1), 121–136.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Towards an ethnography of neo-liberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Y., & Mansbach, R. (1996). Politics: Authority identities and change. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, T. (Ed.). (1995). Contested territory: Border disputes at the edge of the former Soviet empire studies of communism in transition. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. (1998). The politics of risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galgano, F. A. (2009). The borderless dilemma of contemporary maritime piracy: Its geography and trends. Pennsylvania Geographer, 47(1), 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galluser, W. A. (Ed.). (1994). Political boundaries and co-existence. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1985). A contemporary critique of historical materialism (Vol. 2)., The nation-state and violence Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girot, P. (Ed.). (1994). World boundaries (Vol. 4)., The Americas London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordenker, L., & Weiss, T. G. (1995). Pluralising global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M. (1987). Space as a force of production: Contribution to the debate on realism, capitalism and space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 11, 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1973). The significance of territory. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradus, Y., & Lithwick, H. (Eds.). (1996). Frontiers in regional development. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, W. (1997). One world ready or not. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (1992). Der Mangel an europaischer Demokratie. Der Spiegel, 43, 57–59. (19th October).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gritsch, M. (2005). The nation-state and economic globalization: Soft geo-politics and increased state autonomy? Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, L. (1948). The peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. The American Journal of International Law, 42(1), 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, L. (1968). The peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. In R. A. Falk & W. Hanreider (Eds.), International law and organization (pp. 45–67). New York: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy-Warr, C. (Ed.). (1990). International boundaries and boundary conflict resolution. Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity and the politics of difference. Current Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. (1964). Beyond the nation state. Functionalism and international organization. Pan Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1999). The European nation-state and the pressures of globalization. New Left Review, 235, 46–59. (May–June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanreider, W. (1967). West German foreign policy 1949–1963. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A. (1997). Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities? European Urban and Regional Studies, 4, 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1976). The Marxian theory of the state. Antipode, 8, 80–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The urban experience. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000) Reinventing geography. New Left Review, 4, 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the “spatial fix”. Geographische Review, 2, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzaras, K. (2005). Multi-level governance, Europeanization and the poorest EU region. Epirus and the 2nd Hellenic Community Support Framework, 2nd LSE Symposium on Modern Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1991). Democracy, the nation-state and the global system. Economy and Society, 20(2), 138–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., & McGrew, A. (Eds.). (2002). Governing globalization. Power authority and global governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (1994). States and the re-emergence of global finance (pp. 138–156). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (1999). Sovereignty, territoriality and the globalization of finance. In D. A. Smith, D. J. Solinger, & S. C. Topik (Eds.), States and sovereignty in the global economy (pp. 138–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, J. H. (1957). Rise and demise of the territorial state. World Politics, 9(4), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, J. H. (1959). International politics in the atomic age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley, F. H. (1986). Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1995). Globalization and the future of the nation-state. Economy and Society, 24(3), 408–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1997a). From statism to pluralism. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1997b). Democracy, civil society and global politics. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. Q., & Thompson, G. (1995). Globalization and the future of the nation state. Economy and Society, 24(3), 408–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. Q., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalization in question. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1998). The nation and globalization. Constellations, 5(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. M. (2000). The state and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95, 892–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1982). Reflections on the nation-state in Western Europe today. Journal of Common Market Studies, 20, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (1994). Global capital and the national state. Capital and Class, 52, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (1995). Global capital and the national state. In W. Bonefield & J. Holloway (Eds.), Global capital, national state and the politics of money (pp. 116–140). New York: St Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J.-Y. (2000). Revisiting economic development in post-war Taiwan: The dynamic process of geographical industrialization. Alternative 21st Century Geographies: 2nd International Critical Geography Conference, Taegu, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, A. (2000). Offshoreness, globalization and sovereignty: A postmodern geo-political economy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 25, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on European governance. European Law Journal, 1(2), 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (1999). Sovereignty in world politics, a glance at the conceptual and historical landscape. Political Studies, 47, 431–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997). Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1999). Some critical reflections on globalization and Its illogic(s). In K. Olds, P. Dicken, P. K. Kelly, L. Kong, & H. W.-C. Yeung (Eds.), Globalization and the Asia Pacific: Contested territories (pp. 19–38). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2003a). The future of the state in an era of globalization. International Politics and Society, 3, 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2003b). Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. M. (1994). Who is we? Constructing communities in US-Mexico border discourse. Discourse and Society, 5, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1991). A question of place: Exploring the practice of human geography. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1995). Territorality and the state. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 213–226). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (2001). Out of the ‘moribund backwater’: Territory and territoriality in political geography. Political Geography, 20, 677–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. G. (2001). The European union: An evolving system of multi-level governance…or government? Policy and Politics, 29(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1795). Perpetual peace. In: H. Reiss (Ed.), (1991) Kant: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, E. B. (1991). We are US. The National Interest, Winter, 1991(2), 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. F. (1999). The geographies and politics of globalization. Progress in Human Geography, 23(3), 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution and the role of government. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmansegg, P. G. (1992, December 2). Ein Mass für die Grösse des Staates. Was Wird aus Europa? Europa fehlt die Zustimmung der Bürger, Franfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Kendall, G. (2004). The State, Democracy and Globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, H. (1967). The idea of nationalism. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy (pp. 193–216). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. (1986). Of systems, boundaries and territoriality: An inquiry into the formation of the state system. World Politics, 39(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, S. (1996). Cartographic anxiety: Mapping the body politic in India. In M. J. Shapiro & H. R. Alker (Eds.), Challenging boundaries (pp. 193–214). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehls, T. (1996). Beyond sovereign territory: The space of ecopolitics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. (1991). Europe: The nation-state dies hard. Capital and Class, Spring, 43, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, T. (1999). Things fall apart: State failure and the politics of intervention. International Studies Review, 1(1), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapidoth, R. (1992). Sovereignty in transition. Journal of International Affairs, 45, 325–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gales, P., & Harding, A. (1998). Cities and states in Europe. West European Politics, 21(3), 120–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1974). La Production de L’Éspace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1977). De L’État: Le Mode de Production Étatique (Vol. 3). Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1978). De L’État: Les Contradictionsde L’État Moderne (Vol. 4). Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (1998). The transformation of political community. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1995). Thriving locally in the global economy. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s List. (2007, January 30). Europe’s ‘maritime space’ draws fire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s List. (2009, February 11). Nationality of shipowner has ‘no significance’ says Serghiou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomnitz, L. A. (1988). Informal exchange networks in formal systems: A theoretical model. American Anthropologist, 90(1), 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. W. (1991). The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait. Alternatives, 16, 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (2001). Beyond soft institutionalism: Accumulation, regulation and their geographical fixes. Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1145–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C. B. (1977). Do we need a theory of the state? European Journal of Sociology, 18, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. (1975). Late capitalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangat, R. (2001, February). The death of distance? Globalization of international relations, E-merge. Student Journal of International Affairs, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1993). Nation-states in Europe and other continents: Diversifying, developing, but not dying. Daedalus, 122, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1997). Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state? Journal of International Political Economy, 4(3), 472–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 342–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2004). Editorial: Geography: Making a difference in a globalizing world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 29, 147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1992). Das kapital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. T. (1997). Power shift. Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50–66.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (1980). The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. In A. J. Bergesen (Ed.), Studies of the modern world system (pp. 109–137). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 1, 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miliband, R. (1969). The state in capitalist society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milnar, Z. (1992). Introduction. In Z. Milnar (Ed.), Globalization and territorial identities. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi, M. (1993). A borderless world? From colonialism to transnationalism and the decline of the nation-state. Critical Inquiry, 19, 726–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. & Roberts, E. (1993). The democratic deficit: A guide to quangoland. Papers in Planning Research 44, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D., & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of identity: Global media, electronic landscapes and cultural boundaries. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, J. W. (1994). Abdication from national policy autonomy: What’s left to leave? Politics and Society, 22(2), 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myoshi, M. (1993). A borderless world? From colonialism to transnationalism and the decline of the nation-state. Critical Inquiry, 19, 726–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettl, J. P. (1968). The state as a conceptual variable. World Politics, 20, 559–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. (1995). Boundaries in flux: The ‘green line’ boundary between Israel and the West Bank, boundary and territory briefing (Vol. 5). Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbert, E. (1983). Power and civility. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Tuathail, G. (1997). At the end of geopolitics? Reflections on a pluralizing problematic at the century’s end. Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 22(1), 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obando-Rojas, B., Welsh, I., Bloor, M., Lane, T., Bodigannavar, V., & Maguire, M. (2004). The political economy of fraud in a globalised industry. Sociological Review, 52(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1993). The rise of the region state. Foreign Affairs, 72, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation state: The rise of regional economies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. (1991). Sovereignty: Outline of a contemporary history. Alternatives, 16(4), 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opello, W. C., Jr., & Rosow, S. J. (2004). The nation-state and global order: A historical introduction to contemporary politics. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, international relations and the Westphalian myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (1996a). Territories boundaries and consciousness: The changing geographies of the Finnish-Russian border. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (1996b). Inclusion, exclusion and territorial identities. The meanings of boundaries in the globalizing geopolitical landscape. Nordisk Samhallgeografisk Tidskrift, 23, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2002). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., & Bell, D. (Eds.). (2009a). Space travel and culture: From Apollo to space tourism. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., & Bell, D. (2009b). Introduction: Making space. Sociological Review, 57(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards a multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, P., & Soete, L. (1999). Globalization in search of a future. International Social Science Journal, 160, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. (1995). Sovereignty: An introduction and brief history. Journal of International Affairs, 48, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (1997). Networks in international economic integration. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17(2/3), 1014–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (1998, April 16). Globalization, liberalization, regulation. Conference on Globalization, The Nation-State and Violence, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1969). The problem of the capitalist state. New Left Review, 58, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1992). The work of nations. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea, S. (1998). Trans-state entities: Postmodern cracks in the great Westphalian dam. Geopolitics, 3(2), 30–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodnik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1988). The state in an era of cascading politics, wavering concept, widening competence, withering colossus, or weathering change? Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 13–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2000). The governance of fragmegration: neither a world republic nor a global interstate system Quebec: Congress of the International Political Sciences Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1939). Nationalism. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, K. (2001). Globalization and regional governance. In C. Sheil (Ed.), Globalization: Australian impacts. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1983). Continuity and transformation in the world polity: Toward a neo-liberalist synthesis. World Politics, 35, 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the world polity: Essays on world institutionalization. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rumley, D., & Minghi, J. (Eds.). (1991). The geography of border landscapes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1916). Justice in war time. New York: Cosimo Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1986). Human territorality: Its theory and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, P. (1989). Boundaries: The making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1979). Zionism from the standpoint of its victims. Social Text, 1, 7–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Y. (1994). Transformation: Challenges to the state system. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1997). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2000). Territory and territoriality in the global economy. International Sociology, 15, 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2003). Globalization or denationalization? Review of International Political Economy, 10, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1985a). The difference that space makes. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures (pp. 49–66). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1985b). Industry and space: A sympathetic critique of radical research. Society and Space, 3, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1992). Europaisches Demokratiedefizit und deutscher Föderalismus. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis, 3, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Community and autonomy: Multi-level policy-making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 1(2), 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (1995). The new world order incorporated; the rise of business and the decline of the nation-state. Daedalus, 124, 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, C. H. (Ed.). (1994). World boundaries (Vol. 1)., Global boundaries London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, C. H., & Schofield, R. N. (Eds.). (1994). World boundaries (Vol. 2)., The Middle East London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2004). Globalization and governance: From statism to polycentrism. CSGR Working Paper 130/04, Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization. University of Warwick, Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrier, E., Nadel, E., & Rifas, B. E. (1984). Forces shaping international maritime transport. World Economy, 7, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1996). Regional motors of the global economy. Futures, 28(5), 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seton-Watson, H. (1977). Nations and states: An inquiry into the origin of nations and the politics of nationalism. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. (1994). Moral geographies and the ethics of post-sovereignty. Public Culture, 6, 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. J., & Alker, H. R. (Eds.). (1996). Challenging boundaries: Global flows, territorial identities. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. R. (1993). The ‘myth’ of postmodernism. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(3), 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the west. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism and the design of democratic government. Governance, 18(1), 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sletmo, G. K. (2001). The end of national shipping policy? A historical perspective on shipping policy in a global economy. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3, 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space (1st ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1987). Dangers of the empirical turn: Some comments on the CURS initiative. Antipode, 19, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1993). Homeless/global: Scaling places. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 87–119). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., Solinger, D. J., & Topik, S. C. (Eds.). (1999). States and sovereignty in the global economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. (2004). Governance and democratic transformation. Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorel, G. (1908a). Les Illusions du Progress (The Illusions of Progress) (John & Charlotte Stanley, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorel, G. (1908b). Réflexions sur la violence (Reflections on Violence), (T. E. Hulme, & J. Roth, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, H. (1994a). Institutional selection in international relations: State anarchy as order. International Organization, 48, 527–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, H. (1994b). The sovereign state and its competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalder, F. (2006). Manual Castells. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, M., & Strange, S. (1991). Rival states, rival firms: Competition for world market shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. Territorial development in a global economy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1976). Who runs world shipping? International Affairs, 52(3), 346–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1994). The power gap: Member states and the World economy. In F. Brouwer, V. Lintner, & M. Newman (Eds.), Proceedings of a Conference on Economic Policy Making and the European Union, London European Research Centre, London Federal Trust, University of North London (pp. 19–26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1999). The westfailure system. Review of International Studies, 25, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in south–east Europe. Southeast European Politics, 6(2), 66–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturmey, S. G. (1975). Shipping economics: Collected papers. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1992). Territrial organization and the space/technology nexus. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 17, 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1996). Globalization or glocalization? Networks, territories and re-scaling, School of Geography and the Environment. Oxford: St. Peter’s College, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997a). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–188). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997b). Excluding the other: The contested production of new ‘gestalt of scale’ and the politics of marginalization. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Society, place, economy: States of the art in economic geography (pp. 167–176). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D, 18, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczerski, K. (2004). The EU multi-level governance in post-communist countriesChallenge in governability for the new member states. 12th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Vilnius, Lithuania, May 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (1995). Beyond containers: Internationality, interstateness, interterritorality. Progress in Human Geography, 19, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (1996). Embedded statism and the social sciences: Opening up to new spaces. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1917–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2000). Embedded statism and the social sciences 2: Geographies (and metageographies) in globalization. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1105–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2005). New political geographies: Global civil society and global governance through world city networks. Political Geography, 24, 703–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. (1994). Mercenaries, pirates and sovereigns: Statebuilding and extraterritorial violence in early modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. E., & Krasner, S. D. (1989). Global transactions and the consolidation of sovereignty. In E.-O. Czempiel & J. N. Rosenau (Eds.), Global Change and Theoretical Challenges (pp. 201–203). Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J. (1996). Spatial formations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J., & Olds, K. (1996). Refiguring the economic in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 311–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1994). The time of states. Social Research, 61(2), 269–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishkov, V. A. (2000). Forget the ‘nation’: Post-nationalist understanding of nationalism. Ethic and Racial Studies, 23, 625–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valaskakis, K. (1999). Globalization as theatre. International Social Science Journal, 160, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Creveld, M. (1999). The rise and decline of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoof, L., & Van Tatenhove, J. (2009). EU marine policy on the move: The tension between fisheries and maritime policy. Marine Policy, 33, 726–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1977). Speed and politics. An essay on dromology. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1992). From politics to reason of state: The acquisition and transformation of the language of politics, 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1995). Speed and information: Cyberspace alarm! ctheory.net. www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=72.

  • Vonnegut, K., Jr. (1963). Cat’s cradle. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1991). State sovereignty and the articulation of political space/time. Millennium, 20, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1984). Politics of the world-economy: The states, the movements and the civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. S., & Blake, D. H. (1992). The politics of global economic relations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1999). Globalization and governance. Political Science and Politics, 32(4), 693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. (2 Volumes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. (1992). Reconsidering statehood: Examining the sovereignty intervention boundary. Review of International Studies, 18, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1999). Globalization and national governance: Autonomy or inter-dependence. Review of International Studies, 25(5), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welchman, J. C. (Ed.). (1996). Rethinking borders. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1996). Business systems and global commodity chains: Competing or complimentary forms of economic organization. Competition and Change, 1, 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1998). Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: The limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems. Review of International Political Economy, 5, 445–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (2001). Global capital. National states. In M. Rupert & H. Smith (Eds.), Historical materialism and globalization (pp. 17–39). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N., & Narlikar, A. (2001). Governance and the limits of accountability: The WTO, the IMF, and the world bank. International Social Science Journal, 170, 569–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (1998a). Capital, state and space: Contesting the borderless world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 23, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (1998b). The socio-spatial constitution of business organizations: A geographical perspective. Organization, 5, 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (2000). Embedding foreign affiliates in transnational business networks: The case of Hong Kong firms in south–east Asia. Environment and Planning A, 32, 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel, O., & Meir, A. (Eds.). (1997). Ethnic frontiers and peripheries. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, M. W. (1992). The decaying pillars of the Westphalian temple: Implications for international order and governance. In J. N. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 58–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, M. W., & Sutton, B. A. (1996). Governing global networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (2005). Coping with globalization through a collaborative federate mode of governance. Policy Studies, 26(2), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation-state: The EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 183–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2003). Globalization and global governance: From societal to political denationalization. European Review, 11(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2013). The Nation-State. In: Maritime Governance and Policy-Making. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4153-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics