Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maritime Governance and Policy-Making

Abstract

Governance is defined and placed in the context of policy making in its widest sense. The maritime sector is used as an example of how important governance is to policy making and the success or failure of policy choices within the sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, G. (1982). The politics of defense contracting: The iron triangle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, L. (1979). A theory of capitalist regulation: The US experience. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D. (1982). Taking stock of network analysis: A decade’s results. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 39–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderton, T., & Winchester, N. (2002). Globalization and de-regulation in the maritime industry. Marine Policy, 26, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (1997). Economics of power and space. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economies (pp. 59–70). London: Hodder Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, J. A., & Petkus, E., Jr. (1994). Towards a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sciences, 27, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Hausner, J. (1997). Beyond market and hierarchy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994a). Living in the global. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994b). Holding down the global. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe (pp. 257–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Globalization, institutional thickness and the local economy. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, & A. Madani-Pour (Eds.), Managing cities: The new urban context (pp. 91–108). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C. (2000). The networked polity; regional development in Western Europe. Governance, 13(3), 303–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (1988). New informational technology and industrial change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1989). Strong states and weak states; sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist countries. British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), 154–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, P. S., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 1947–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J. (2005). Global capitalism and commodity chains: Looking back, going forward. Competition and Change, 9(2), 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J. (2008). Analysing global economic organization: Embedded networks and global chains. Economy and Society, 37(3), 339–364.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baltazar, R., & Brooks, M. R. (2001). The governance of port devolution: A tale of two countries. Seoul, Korea: World Conference on Transport Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S., & Fudge, C. (Eds.). (1981). Policy and action. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Park, A. (2006). The problematic metagovernance of networks; water reform in New South Wales. Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors: Enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. K. (1982). A framework for policy analysis. In D. L. Rogers & D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Interorganizational coordination: Theory research and implementation (pp. 137–170). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, A. F. (1908). The process of government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (1998). Politikverflechtung ohne Politikverflechtungsfalle. Koordination und Strukturdynamik im europaischen Mehrebenensystem. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 39, 558–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2000). Entflechtung als Folge von Verflechtung. Theoretische Uberlegungen zur Entwicklung des europaischen Mehrebenesystems. In E. Grande & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Wie problemlosingsfahig ist die EU? Regieren im europaischen Mehrebenesystem. Baden–Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L. (1993). Between modernism and postmodernism. Progress in Human Geography, 17(4), 490–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance, 16(4), 503–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Hansen, J. (1997). A ‘new institutional’ perspective on policy networks. Public Administration, 75, 669–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M., & Sampson, H. (2009). Regulatory enforcement of labour standards in an outsourcing globalized industry. Work, Employment and Society, 23(4), 711–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M., Datta, R., Gilinskiy, Y., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2006). Unicorn amongst the cedars: On the possibility of effective’smart regulation’ of the globalized shipping industry. Social and Legal Studies, 15(4), 534–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon—on the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76, 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (2007). European governance—negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Montreal, Canada: European Studies Association Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (2010). European governance: negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(2), 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T.A., Guttenbrunner, S., & Seper, S. (2005). Conceptualizing new modes of governance in EU enlargement. Report on the European Commission New Modes of Governance Project NEWGOV, Berlin: Free University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1990). The regulation school: A critical introduction. New York: Columba University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, U., Kenis, P., Raab, J., Schneider, V., & Wagner, D. (1999). Explorations into the visualization of policy networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(1), 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans, M. (1997). Challenges to the practice and theory of public administration in Europe. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 9(3), 389–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1982). The wheels of commerce. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R. (2004). The governance structure of ports. Review of Network Economics, 3(2), 168–183.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R. (2007). Port devolution and governance in Canada. In M. R. Brooks & K. P. Cullinane (Eds.), Devolution, port governance and port performance (pp. 237–258). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R., & Cullinane, K. P. (2007a). Introduction. In M. R. Brooks & K. P. Cullinane (Eds.), Devolution, port governance and port performance. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R., & Cullinane, K. P. (2007b). Governance models defined. In M. R. Brooks & K. P. Cullinane (Eds.), Devolution, port governance and port performance (pp. 1–28). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D. (1983). Managing conflict among groups. In D. A. Kolb, I. M. Rubin, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational psychology. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugha, R., & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny, A. (1987). Ruling the waves. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny, A. (1991). Toward a maritime policy. In L. Hurwitz & C. Lequesne (Eds.), The state of the European Community (pp. 285–299).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairola, E., & Chiarabini, A. (1999). International labour standards: A trade union training guide, international training centre: Torino. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L. (1996). Non-hierarchical implementation analysis. An alternative to the methodological mismatch in policy analysis. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 8(4), 527–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L. (2000). Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 502–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The information age. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cater, D. (1964). Power in Washington. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (1994). The dynamics of financial globalization: technology, market structure and policy response. Policy Sciences, 27(4), 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (2001). From ‘iron triangles’ to ‘golden pentangles’? Globalizing the policy process. Global Governance, 7, 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers, E., & Urquhart, B. (1994). Renewing the United Nations system. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskajold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chircop, A. (2009). The growth of international shipping in the Arctic. Is a regulatory review timely? The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 24, 355–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chlomoudis, C. I., Karalis, A. V., & Pallis, A. A. (2000). Transition to a new reality: Theorising the organizational restructuring of ports. Infomare, International Workshop, Special Interest Group on Maritime Transport and Ports, Genoa, June 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1999). Community governance, community leadership and the new local government. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coicaud, J.-M. (2001). Reflections on international organizations and international legitimacy: Constraints, pathologies, and possibilities. International Social Science Journal, 170, 523–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001a). European governance. A white paper, COM (2001) 428, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001b). Strengthening Europe’s contribution to world governance. Report of Governance Working Group 5, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001c). Multi-level governance: Linking and networking the various regional and local levels. Report of Governance Working Group 4c, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2006). A future maritime policy for the Union: A European vision of the oceans and seas. COM (2006) 275, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2008a). An integrated maritime policy for the European Union. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2008b). Guidelines for an integrated approach to maritime policy: Towards best practice in integrated maritime governance and stakeholder consultation. COM (2008) 395 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2009). Towards an integrated maritime policy for better governance in the Mediterranean. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (2009) 466 Final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: new departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D, 11, 543–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B. L. (1996). Policy implementation: The organizational challenge. World Development, 24(9), 1403–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. E. (1976). Politics, economics and welfare. New York: Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. S. (2005). Local governance and the dialectics of hierarchy, market and network. Policy Studies, 26(3/4), 311–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alcantara, C. H. (1998). Uses and abuses of the concept of governance. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn, J. A., & Ringeling, A. B. (1997). Normative notes. Perspectives on networks. In W. J. M. Kickert, E. H. Klijn, & J. F. M. Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing complex networks (pp. 152–165). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Langen, P. W. (2002). Clustering and performance: The case of the maritime clustering in the Netherlands. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Senarclens, P. (1998). Governance and the crisis in the international mechanisms of regulation. International Social Science Journal, 50(55), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Senarclens, P. (2001). International organizations and the challenges of globalization. International Social Science Journal, 170, 509–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vivero, J. L. S., & Mateos, J. C. R. (2010). Ocean governance in a competitive world. The BRIC countries as emerging maritime powers—building new geopolitical scenarios. Marine Policy, 34, 967–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (1984). A regulation approach interpretation of the contemporary crisis. Capital and Class, 2, 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervis, K., & Ozer, C. (2005). A better globalization: Legitimacy governance and reform. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (1994). Global-local tensions: Firms and states in the global space-economy. Economic Geography, 70(2), 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, W. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43, 136–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Mahel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M. (1981). The politics of mass housing in Britain 1945–1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1997). Alliance capitalism and global business. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R., & Ziegler, H. (1970). The irony of democracy. An uncommon introduction to American politics. Belmont, CA: Wedsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B., & Kerwer, D. (2004). New governance in the European Union: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G. (1981). The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 2(4), 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (1991). Inner space. May 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., & Lawrence, P. R. (Eds.). (1991). Socio-economics: Towards a new synthesis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2001). Understanding dialectics in policy network analysis. Political Studies, 49, 542–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figgis, J. N. (1913). Churches in the modern state. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filley, A. C. (1975). Interpersonal conflict resolution. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, L. S. (1995). What is global governance? Global Governance, 1, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1918). The new state. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1973). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. In E. M. Fox & L. Urwick (Eds.), London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., & Johanson, J. (1992). Managing in international multi-centre firms. In M. Forsgren & J. Johanson (Eds.), Managing networks in international business. Philadelphia, PA: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1966). Industrial Sociology and Industrial Relations. Royal Commission on Trades Unions and Employers’ Associations, HMSO: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1974). Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations. Faber and Faber: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, H. G., & Smith, K. B. (2003). The public administration theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. L. (1965). The political process. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1990). Networks of innovators. Montreal: International Workshop on Networks of Innovators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. L., & Stevens, J. P. (1987). A theoretical and conceptual re-examination of subsystem politics. Public Policy and Administration, 2, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. (2010). Towards a ‘new form of governance’ in science-policy relations in the European maritime policy. Marine Policy, 34, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furger, F. (1997). Accountability and systems of self-governance: the case of the maritime industry. Law and Policy, 19(4), 445–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gais, T. L., Peterson, M. A., & Walker, J. L. (1984). Interest groups, iron triangles and representative institutions in American national government. British Journal of Political Science, 14(2), 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galgano, F. A. (2009). The borderless dilemma of contemporary maritime piracy: Its geography and trends. Pennsylvania Geographer, 47(1), 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin, J. (1998). Modern governance, yesterday and today: Some clarifications to be gained from French government policies. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gekara, V. O. (2010). The stamp of neo-liberalism on the UK tonnage tax and the implications for British seafaring. Marine Policy, 34(3), 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. L., & Lincoln, J. R. (1992). The organization of business networks in the United States and Japan. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P., Bair, J., & Ponte, S. (2008). Governing global value chains: An introduction. Economy and Society, 37(3), 315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, A., & Donovan, A. (2000). The abandoned ocean. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1985). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. The nation-state and violence (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glagow, M., & Willke, H. (Eds.). (1987). Dezentrale Gesellschaftssteurung: Probleme der Integration polyzentristischer Gesellschaft. Pfaffenweiller: Centraurus-Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P. (1995). Managing environmental disputes. In P. Glasbergen (Ed.), Network management as an alternative. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, T., & Wells, P. (2009). Governance and evaluation: The case of EU regional policy horizontal priorities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. (1993). Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socio-economics of industrial networks (pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G., & Stark, D. (1997). Organizing diversity: Evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional Studies, 31, 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1994). Business groups and social organization. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 429–450). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1995). Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R. (1992). The sociology of economic life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, E. S. (1939). The impasse of democracy. New York: Harrison-Wilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohira, N., & Zaheer, A. (Eds.), (2000). Special issue: Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 191–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagg, L., & Johanson, J. (Eds.). (1992). Firms in networks. Stockholm: SNS Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H. (1987). Industrial technological development. A network approach. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanf, K. (1978). Introduction. In K. Hanf & F. W. Scharpf (Eds.), Interorganizational policymaking (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J., Law, J., & Lee, N. (1999). Special themed section on actor-network theory and managerialism. Organization, 6, 387–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzaras, K. (2005). Multi-level governance, Europeanization and the poorest EU region. Epirus and the 2nd Hellenic Community Support Framework, 2nd LSE Symposium on Modern Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. H. (1972). Policy analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87–124). Washington, DC: American Enterprize Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. H., & Wildavsky, A. (1974). The private government of public money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Salisbury, R. H., & Nelson, R. L. (1990). Inner circles or hollow cores? Elite networks in national policy systems. Journal of Politics, 52(2), 356–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1991). Democracy, the nation-state and the global system. Economy and Society, 20(2), 138–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, A., & Feher, F. (1988). The postmodern political condition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heretier, A. (2002). New modes of governance in Europe: Policymaking without legislating? In A. Heretier (Ed.), Common goods: Reinventing European and international governance (pp. 185–206). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M. (2004). Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embededness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M. (2008). Governance, value chains and networks: An afterword. Economy and Society, 37(3), 452–459.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. J., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2004). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindell, K. (1996). Strengthening the ship regulating regime. Maritime Policy and Management, 23(4), 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, L. (2001). Policy implications and reconstruction of marine institutional architectures: The regional indigenous organization (RIO) option. Marine Policy, 25, 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1997a). From statism to pluralism. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1997b). Democracy, civil society and global politics. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. Q., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalization in question. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferbert, R. (1974). The study of public policy. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, H. C. H., & Toller, A. E. (1998). Zur Reform der Komitologie—Regeln und Grundsatze fur die Verwaltungskooperation im Ausschussßystem der Europaischen Gemeinschaft. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis, 1(2), 209–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogsteden, C. B., Robertson, G., & Benwell, G. (1999). Enabling sound marine governance. Regulating resource rights and responsibilities in offshore New Zealand. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute of Surveyors and FIG Commission 7th Conference and Annual General Assembly, October 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, T., & Wallerstein, I. (1994). Commodity chains: Construct and research. In G. Gereffi & M. Korzeniewicz (Eds.), Commodity chains and global capitalism (pp. 17–19). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseus, D., & Pal, L. A. (1997). Anatomy of a policy area: The case of shipping. Canadian Public Policy, 23(4), 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. (1989). Potential of information technology and economic growth in Japan. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K., & Baba, Y. (1989). Systemic information and cross-border networks. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on European governance. European Law Journal, 1(2), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001). The governance approach to European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1909). A pluralistic universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1992b). The post-modern agenda. In C. Jencks (Ed.), The post-modern reader (pp. 10–39). London: Academy Editions, (1992a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997). Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance, Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2003a). The future of the state in an era of globalization. International Politics and Society, 3, 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2003b). Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance. Changes in the EU as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 49–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Mattson, L. G. (1987). Interorganizational relations in industrial systems—a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1975). Clean air. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. O. (1979). American politics and the organization of energy decision-making. Annual Review of Energy, 4, 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 4, 911–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. (1981). Iron triangles, woolly corporatism and elastic nets: Images of the policy process. Journal of Public Policy, 1, 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. G. (1990a). Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Refilling the old bottles? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. (1990b). Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. G. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance…or government? Policy and Politics, 29(2), 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., & Schubert, K. (1992). A preliminary ordering of policy network issues. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, D., Stoker, G., & Wolman, H. (1995). Urban politics and theory: An introduction. In D. Judge, G. Stoker & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 1–12). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (1994). Policy networks, networks and European Union policy-making: A sceptical view. West European Politics, 17(4), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazancigil, A. (1998). Governance and science: Market-like modes of managing society and producing knowledge. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M., & Hooghe, L. (1996). By-passing the nation-state? In J. J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making (pp. 216–229).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (1989). Policy networks as an analytical tool for policy analysis. Max Planck Institut Conference, December 4–5, Koln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (1991). Policy network and policy analysis; scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, K. V., & Waarden, F. V. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines; cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution and the role of government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (1993). Complexity, governance and dynamics. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance (pp. 191–204). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (Ed.). (1978). The new American political system. Washington, DC: American Enterprize Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Kendall, G. (2004). The state, democracy and globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas alternatives and public policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks. Public Management, 2(2), 135–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (Ed.). (1990). Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., & Eising, R. (Eds.). (1999). The transformation of governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T. (2009). A note on the European Union’s integrated maritime policy. Ocean Development and International Law, 40, 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, T. (1993a). Social and political governance. In T. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, T. (Ed.). (1993b). Modern governance. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovats, L. (2006). How flag states lost the plot over shipping’s governance. Does a ship need a sovereign? Maritime Policy and Management, 33(1), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahmann, E. (2003). National, regional and global governance: One phenomenon or many? Global Governance, 9, 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, K., & Schulz, M. (1993). Informal collaboration in R & D: The formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies, 14, 189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, H. J. (1917). Studies in the problem of sovereignty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, H. J. (1919). Authority in the modern state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. (1958). Politics. Who gets what, when and how. New York: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1994). Organising modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7, 428–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1987). Mirages and miracles: The crisis of global Fordism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1988). Reflection on a tale; the Marxist foundations of the concepts of regulation and accumulation. Studies in Political Economy, 26, 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s List. (2008). Italy’s maritime coalition in governance plea, March 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. R. (1979). The end of liberalism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: an analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A. (1950). Congress and water resources. American Political Science Review, 44(3), 756–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A. (1951). Muddy waters: The army engineers and the nation’s rivers. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (1997). Institutional thickness and industrial governance in Lowland Scotland. Area, 29, 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, F. W. (1911). Collected papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J., & Wickham, G. (1995). Governance and failure: On the limits of sociology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (Eds.), (1991). Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, S., & Cainarca, G. C. (1986). The evolution of transaction governance in the textile-clothing industry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 7, 354–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multilevel governance (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 342–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (1983). Pressure politics. London: Junction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (1995). State theory and the policy network model, Paper 102, University of Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy networks in British government. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2004). Editorial: Geography: Making a difference in a globalizing world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 29, 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (2002). Dragon multinational. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (1976). Conceptual models of organizational decision-making and their application to the policy process. In G. Hofstede & S. Kassem (Eds.), European contribution to organization theory (pp. 114–125). Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2004). Governance im modernen Staat. In A. Benz (Ed.), Governance—regieren in komplexen regelsystemen (pp. 65–76). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Steuerung und Selbstorganization in staatsnahen Sektoren. In R. Mayntz & F. W. Scharpf (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung (pp. 9–38). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S. (2000). Introduction: Integrating gender—intellectual and ‘real world’ mainstreaming. Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (Eds.). (1993). Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1980). A multivariate model of public policy-making. American Journal of Political Science, 24(3), 439–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, G. (1995). Pluralism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrien, F.-X. (1998). Governance and modern welfare states. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 1, 144–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1911). Political parties. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, M. (2006). Policy network analysis as a strategic tool for the voluntary sector. Policy Studies, 27(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1986). Organizations: new concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1992). Causes of failures in network organizations. California Management Review, 34(4), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. B., & Wamsley, G. (1984). Policy subsystems, networks and the tools of public management. In R. Eyestone (Ed.), Public policy formation and implementation (pp. 3–25). New York: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. B., & Wamsley, G. (1985). Policy subsystems, networks and the tools of public management. In K. Hanf & Th. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, R. T. (1987). The textbook policy process and implementation research. Policy Studies Review, 7(1), 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2001). Modernising governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1997). Fragmentation and centralization in the governance of London. Urban Studies, 24, 867–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (2001). The politics of the new Europe. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L. D. (2001). Introduction. In L. D. Nielsen & H. H. Oldrup (Eds.), Mobility and transport (pp. 9–11). Aalborg: Transportradet, Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. W. (2007). Metagovernance in the global compact—regulation of a global governance network. Center for Democratic Network Governance, Roskilde, Working Paper, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohira, N. (1992). Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In N. Nohira & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure form and action (pp. 1–22). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohira, N., & Goshal, S. (1997). The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, E. (1981). On the autonomy of the democratic state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2001a). Reassessing public sector involvement in European seaports. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3(2), 242–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2001b). Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy and Management, 28(1), 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (2002). Fiscal and regulatory competition: theory and evidence. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 3, 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obando-Rojas, B., Welsh, I., Bloor, M., Lane, T., Bodigannavar, V., & Maguire, M. (2004). The political economy of fraud in a globalised industry. Sociological Review, 52(3), 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, M., & Stoker, G. (1994). Urban regimes and leadership in Detroit. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30(1), 48–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, G. (1999). Governance through social learning. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2005). Economic sociologies in space. Economic Geography, 81(2), 129–175.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Perepelkin, M., Knapp, S., Perepelkin, G., & de Pooter, M. (2010). An improved methodology to measure flag performance for the shipping industry. Marine Policy, 34, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perraton, J., & Wells, P. (2004). Multi-level governance and economic policy. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 179–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1986). American public policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76, 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. A. (1993). Political influence in the 1990s: From iron triangles to policy networks. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 18(2), 395–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (1994). Policy networks and governance in the European Union. In P. Dunleavy & J. Stanyer (Eds.), Contemporary political studies (Vol. 1). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, Swansea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, P., & Soete, L. (1999). Globalization in search of a future. International Social Science Journal, 160, 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (1997). Networks in international economic integration. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17(2/3), 1014–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, R. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Stoker, G. (2002). Towards multi-level governance. In P. Dunleavy, A. Gamble, R. Heffernan, & I. Holliday (Eds.), British politics 6. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plasman, C. (2008). Implementing marine spatial planning: A policy perspective. Marine Policy, 32, 811–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. P. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and economic life. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 368–402). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Policy analysis implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Propper, I. M. A. M. (1996). Success and failure in the management of policy networks. Beleidswetenschap, 10(4), 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness; a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administration Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). What makes democracy work? Civic infrastructure (pp. 101–7). Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaymakers, S. (2003). Maritime transport and high seas governance—regulation, risks and the IMO regime. International Workshop on Governance of High Seas Biodiversity Conservation, June 17–20, Cairns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabach, E., & Kim, E. M. (1994). Where is the chain in commodity chains? The service sector nexus. In G. Gereffi & M. Korzeniewicz (Eds.), Commodity chains and global capitalism (pp. 123–161). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The Europeanization of public policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., Rueda-Sabater, E. J., & Kraft, R. (2009). Rethinking fundamental principles of global governance: How to represent states and populations in multilateral institutions. Governance, 22(3), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1986). The national world of local government. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1988). Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: The subsectoral governments of Britain. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy networks, a British perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1999). Foreword. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new management of British local level governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance authority: Steering and democracy (pp. 54–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. J., & Jordan, G. (1979). Governing under pressure. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 482–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. (1987). Congress, the bureaucracy and public policy. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P. (1978). Conflict management and conflict resolution are not synonymous terms. California Management Review, 21, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (1997). Transportation and spatial cycles: Evidence from maritime systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 5(2), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronit, K., & Schneider, V. (1999). Global governance through private organizations. Governance, 12(3), 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1997). The complexities and contradictions of globalization. Current History, 96, 360–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2000). The governance of fragmegration: Neither a world republic nor a global interstate system. Quebec: Congress of the International Political Sciences Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Globalization and governance: Bleak prospects for sustainability. Internationale Politik und Gessellschaft, 3, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. S. (1958). Organized labour and management: The UK. In E. M. Hugh-Jones (Ed.), Human relations and modern management. North Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. S. (1969). Constructive conflict. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1959). My philosophical development. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1972). The philosophy of logical atomism. In D. Pears (Ed.), Russell’s logical atomism (pp. 54–61). London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. (1989). The re-emergence of regional economies. In P. Hirst & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), Reversing industrial design? (pp. 17–70). Leamington Spa: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1997). Homo geographicus: A framework for action, awareness and moral concern. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administration Science Quarterly, 40, 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoie, D. J. (1999). Governing from the centre: The concentration of power in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (Ed.). (1993). Games in hierarchies and networks. Analytical and empirical approaches to the study of governance institutions. Frankfurt-am-Main: Campus Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Community and autonomy: Multi-level policy-making in the European union. Journal of European Public Policy, 1(2), 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2001). Notes toward a theory of multilevel governing in Europe. Scandinavian Political Studies, 24(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (1979). Still the century of corporatism. In P. Schmitter & G. Lehmbruch (Eds.), Trends towards corporatist intermediation (pp. 7–52). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (1996). Imagining the future of the Euro-Polity with the help of new concepts. In G. Marks, F. W. Scharpf, P. C. Schmitter, & W. Streeck (Eds.), Governance in the European union (pp. 121–150). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P., & Lehmbruch, G. (Eds.). (1979). Trends towards corporatist intermediation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V. (1992). The structure of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholzman, K., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Governance organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schout, A., & Jordan, A. (2005). Coordinated European governance; self-organizing or centrally steered. Public Administration, 83(1), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1994). Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L. J. (1984). National and subnational government and coordination. In F. X. Kaufmann, V. Ostrom, & G. Majone (Eds.), Guidance control and evaluation in the public sector. de Gruyter: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, H. B. (1978). Superships and nation-states: The transnational politics of the intergovernmental maritime consultative organization. Colorado, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism and the design of democratic government. Governance, 18(1), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2004). Negotiating the institutional void. Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B., & Fremont, A. (2005). Transformation of port terminal operations: From the local to the global. Transport Reviews, 25(1), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sletmo, G. K. (2002a). The rise and fall of national shipping policies. In C. Grammenos (Ed.), The handbook of maritime economics and business (pp. 471–494). London: Lloyd’s of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sletmo, G. K. (2002b). National shipping policy and global markets: A retrospective for the future. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Panama City, November 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. (1993). Pressure power and policy, state autonomy and policy networks in britain and the United states. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1997). Antinomies of space and nature in Henri Lefebvre’s the production of space. Philosophy and Geography, 2, 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smouts, M. (1998). The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Coleman, H. J., Jr. (1992). Managing 21st century network organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 20(3), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. (2004). Governance and democratic transformation. Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sǿrensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance. The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalder, F. (2006). Manual Castells. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D., & Bruszt, L. (1995). Network properties of assets and liabilities: Inter-enterprize ownership networks in Hungary and the Czech republic, Working Paper on Transitions from State Socialism, Einaudi Center for International Studies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1996). A dogma of our times—the separation of policy-making and implementation. Public Money and Management, 16(3), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., & Stoker, G. (1988). From local administration to community, government. Fabian Research Series 351, London: The Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (Ed.). (1999). The new management of British local level governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2004). Transforming local governance: From Thatcherism to new labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In W. Streeck & P. C. Schmitter (Eds.), Private interest government. Beyond market and state (pp. 1–29). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturmey, S. G. (1975). Shipping economics: Collected papers. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1991). Rational choice: A survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. Economic Journal, 101, 751–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunley, P. (2008). Relational economic geography: A partial understanding or a new paradigm? Economic Geography, 84(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M., & Nichols, S. (2006). Issues in the governance of marine spaces. In M. Sutherland (Ed.), Administering marine spaces: International issues (pp. 6–20). Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerski, K. (2004). The EU multi-level governance in post-communist countries—challenge in governability for the new member states. 12th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Vilnius, Lithuania, May 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Termeer, K. (2008). Third generation governance. Dies Natalis Symposium, Netherlands: Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of organizational and industrial psychology (pp. 889–935). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. F. (2003). Between markets and hierarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2005). Networks and public management. International Workshop on New Developments in Institutional Theory and the Analysis of Institutional Changes in Capitalism, Roskilde: Roskilde University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J. (1996). Spatial formations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, A., & Peck, J. A. (1992). Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-fordism; missing links in regulationist research. Progress in Human Geography, 16(2), 190–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tradewinds, (2011). It’s time for new ways of thinking. October 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O., Bahr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance; towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, D. (1971). The governmental process. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turke, R. (2008). Governance. Systemic foundation and framework. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valaskakis, K. (1999). Globalization as theatre. International Social Science Journal, 160, 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallega, A. (2001). Ocean governance in a post-modern society—a geographical perspective. Marine Policy, 25, 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Loo, B., & Van de Velde, S. (2003). Key success factors for positioning small-island sea ports for competitive advantage. Rotterdam: Faculteit der Bedrifskunde/Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, J. (2008). Policy change and spheres of authority in the global environmental governance of shipping in the North Sea. International Studies Association’s Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, J., & Bruyninckx, H. (2006). The use of governance typologies in the analysis of the global environmental governance of the dumping of waste during shipping. maritime risks and vulnerability. 3rd International Conference on the Centre for Maritime Research ‘People and the Sea III: New Directions in Coastal and Maritime Studies’, Amsterdam, July 7–9 2005. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Centre for Maritime Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tatenhove, J. (2008). Innovative forms of marine governance: A reflection. www.dies.wur.nl.

  • Van Tatenhove, J., Mak, J., & Liefferink, D. (2006). The inter-play between formal and informal practices. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7(1), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, P. (2009). European ports policy: Meeting contemporary governance challenges. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(1), 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. (2010). Undermining the integrated maritime policy. Marine Policy, 60(3), 323–333.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., & Olivier, D. (2003). Port governance and port-city relationships in China. Research Seminar: Maritime Transport Globalization, Regional Integration and Territorial Development, Le Havre, France, June 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., & Slack, B. (2002). Port governance in china: A case study of Shanghai. Occasional Paper Series, Paper No. 9, The Centre for China Urban and Regional Studies, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Baptist University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., Ng, A. K., & Olivier, D. (2004). Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices. Transport Policy, 11, 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (1911). The realm of ends, or pluralism and theism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, N. (2011). Small state, maritime great power? Norway’s strategies for influencing the maritime policy of the European union. Marine Policy, 35, 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (1997). An ever closer fusion? A dynamic macropolitical view on integration processes. Journal of Common Market Studies, 35, 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1993). The new cultural politics of difference. In C. West (Ed.), Keeping faith: Philosophy and race in America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S., & Wright, M. (1987). Comparative government industry relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (1987). The specialized agencies, the United Nations: The system in crisis. London: C. Hurst and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (2005). Good governance and global governance. Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (1977). The limits of legitimacy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N., & Narlikar, A. (2001). Governance and the limits of accountability: The WTO, the IMF, and the world bank. International Social Science Journal, 170, 569–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/wbigf/governance.

  • Yannopoulos, G. N. (Ed.). (1989). Shipping policies for an open world economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarborough, B. V., & Yarborough, R. M. (1992). Cooperation and governance in international trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (1998). The socio-spatial constitution of business organizations: A geographical perspective. Organization, 5, 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (2005). Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 30, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yishai, Y. (1992). From an iron triangle to an iron duet? European Journal of Political Research, 21, 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1996). The effectiveness of international governance systems. In O. R. Young, G. J. Demko, & K. Ramakrishna (Eds.), Global change and international governance (p. 1027). Hannover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, M. W., & Sutton, B. A. (1996). Governing global networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (2005). Coping with globalization through a collaborative federate mode of governance. Policy Studies, 26(2), 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S., & Di Maggio, F. (Eds.). (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (1993). What has changed in Europe? The challenge of globalization and individualization. What Has Changed? Competing Perspectives on World Order, Copenhagen, May 14–16th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (1998). Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation-state; the EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2003). Globalization and global governance; from societal to political denationalization. European Review, 11(3), 341–364.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Plymouth Business School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Michael Roe

Authors
  1. Michael Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2013). Governance. In: Maritime Governance and Policy-Making. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4153-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation