Advertisement

A Case Study: Re-designing the AVIS Website

  • Luciana Cardoso de Castro Salgado
  • Carla Faria Leitão
  • Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

This chapter presents and discusses the main results of a case study carried out to assess HCI designers’ and evaluators’ understanding and use of CVM, as well as the metaphors’ potential for informing and improving the design and evaluation of cross-cultural systems. In this case study, our research question was: how can CVM support HCI practitioners (if at all) at design and evaluation time? The two-step case study used the AVIS website both in (re)design and evaluation time. Our conclusion is that CVM indeed contribute to HCI research in cross-cultural design, since they frame, organize and structure HCI designers’ thinking and thus function as an epistemic tool to support the elaboration of culture-sensitive metacommunication discourse.

Keywords

Cultural Variable Reading Fluency Interface Element Cultural Issue Evaluation Questionnaire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Barber, W., & Badre, A. (1998, June 5). Culturability: The merging of culture and usability. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on human factors & the web. Basking Ridge: Online publi­cation. Available at http://www.research.att.com/conf/hfweb/proceedings/barber/index.htm. Last visited in Jan 2012.
  2. 2.
    Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Souza, C. S. (2005). The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Souza, C. S., & Leitão, C. F. (2009). Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in HCI. San Francisco: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Del Gado, E., & Nielsen, J. (1986). International user interfaces. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denzin, N., & Lincon, Y. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A., & Greenidge, K.-D. (2004). Improving web accessibility: A study of webmaster perceptions; the compass of human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nicolaci-da-Costa, A., Leitão, C., & Romão-Dias, D. (2001). Gerando conhecimento sobre os homens, mulheres e crianças que usam computadores: algumas contribuições da psicologia clínica. In Symposium on human factors in computers systems, IHC 2001 (pp. 120–131). Florianópolis: Anais SBC.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. (Eds.). (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prates, R. O., de Souza, C. S., & Barbosa, S. D. J. (2000). A method for evaluating the communicability of user interfaces. ACM Interactions, 7(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salgado, L. C. (2011). Cultural viewpoint metaphors to explore and communicate cultural perspectives in cross-cultural HCI design. Ph.D. thesis applied to Computer Science Department, PUC-Rio, Brazil. Online at http://www2.dbd.puc-rio.br/pergamum/biblioteca/php/mostrateses.php?open=1&arqtese=0711306_2011_Indice.html. Last visited in February 2012.
  13. 13.
    Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stephanidis, C., Paramythis, A., Akouminakis, D., & Sfyrakis, M. (1998). Self adapting web-based systems: Towards universal accessibility. In C. Stephanidis & A. Waern (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th ERCIM Workshop on ‘User Interfaces for All’, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciana Cardoso de Castro Salgado
    • 1
  • Carla Faria Leitão
    • 1
  • Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics Semiotic Engineering Research GroupPUC-RioRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations