Skip to main content

Safety Assessment for Lunar Nuclear Power Reactor in Cooling Accident

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atomic Information Technology

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

The safety assessment of an accident in the lunar base power plant is investigated for the stability of the operation. The lunar surface reactor is modeled for this study. The accident of cooling loop failure (ACLF) is one of the important scenarios for the virtual case in the moon nuclear power plant (NPP). The newly designed lunar nuclear power reactor (LNPR) is suggested for the commercial purpose. The system dynamics (SD) is used for the simulation of the safety assessment. The cyclic variation of the lunar surface temperature can affect to the physical situation of the coolant, which is expressed by the time step. The result shows the performance possibility of the long term cooling increases slightly in the short period of the time step. The dynamical simulation of the lunar environment is performed for the conceptual design of the NPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NASA (2009) http://www.nasa.gov/news/index.html

  2. NASA (2010) http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/images/content/272677main_FSP_HR.jpg

  3. NASA (2010) Radiation shielding for a lunar base. Final Report, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cosmosmagazine (2010) http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/features/online/2760/nuclear-power-moon

  5. NASA (2008) http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/sep/HQ_08-227_Moon _Power.html

  6. Prado M (2009) Introduction to permanent, http://www.permanent.com, General dynamics/Convair under contract to NASA

  7. Ewert M (1993) Investigation of lunar base thermal control system options. In: 23rd International conference on environmental systems, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Paper number 932112

    Google Scholar 

  8. Everline CJ, Paulos T (2006) Comparison of techniques for modeling accident progression in dynamic aerospace applications with and without repair. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fragola JR, McFadden R-H (1995) External maintenance rate prediction and design concepts for high reliability and availability on space station Freedom. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 49:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fatemi NS, Polland HE, Hou HQ, Sharps PR (1999) Solar array trades between very high-efficiency multi-junction and si space solar cells. IEEE photovoltaic specialist conference, Anchorage, Alaska

    Google Scholar 

  11. Swaminathan S, Van Halle JY, Smidts C, Mosleh A, Bell S, Rudolph K, Mulvihill RJ, Bream B (1997) The Cassini Mission probabilistic risk analysis: comparison of two probabilistic dynamic methodologies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitt H (2003) Private enterprise approach to lunar base activation. Adv Space Res 31:2441–2447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bodkin D, Escalera P, Bocam KJ (2006) A human lunar surface base and infrastructure solution. AIAA 206–7336, Space 2006, San Jose, CA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Park C, Sunada E (2008) Vapor compression hybrid two-phase loop technology to lunar surface applications. Space technology and application international forum-STAIF 2008, Albuquerque, NM

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siu N (1994) Risk assessment for dynamic systems: an overview. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 43:43–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belhadj M, Aldemir T (1996) Some computational improvements in process system reliability and safety analysis using dynamic methodologies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Radzicki M, Taylor R (1997) U. S. department of energy’s introduction to system dynamics. A systems approach to understanding complex policy issues, version 1, Sustainable Solutions, Inc., Como

    Google Scholar 

  18. Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. Productivity press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  19. Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. Productivity press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forrester JW (1971) World dynamics. Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forrester JW (1975) Collected papers of Jay W. Forrester. Pegasus Communications, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kampmann CE (1996) Feedback loop gains and system behavior. In: Proceedings of the 1996 international system dynamics conference Boston. System Dynamics Society, Albany, pp 260–263

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liehr M, Grobler A, Klein M, Milling PM (2001) Cycles in the sky : understanding and managing business cycles in the airline market. Syst Dyn Rev 17(4):311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vensim (2009) Vensim simulation software. Ventana Systems, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  26. PowerSim, Powersim software

    Google Scholar 

  27. ITHINK Software, ISEE systems, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  28. Woo TH, Yoon JH, Lee SJ (in press) Safety assessment for power uprate in the nuclear power plant using system dynamics (SD) method by Monte Carlo software. Ener Sou, Part A: Rec Util and Env Eff

    Google Scholar 

  29. Woo TH, Kim YI (in press) Financial modeling of nanotechnology (NT) for energy industry using systems thinking decision making. Ener Sou, Part A: Rec Util and Env Eff

    Google Scholar 

  30. Woo TH, Lee SH (2012) Dynamical study for earthquake of seismic probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) using system dynamics (SD) method. Ener Sou, Part A: Rec Util and Env Eff 34(10):948–958

    Google Scholar 

  31. IAEA (2008) The international nuclear and radiological event scale. User’s manual, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woo, T. (2012). Safety Assessment for Lunar Nuclear Power Reactor in Cooling Accident . In: Atomic Information Technology. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4029-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4030-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics