Abstract
Pulmonary embolism from deep venous thrombosis reduces the cross-sectional area of the pulmonary vascular bed, resulting in an incremental increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and subsequent increased right ventricular afterload. Thus, large or recurrent pulmonary emboli can be fatal. Anticoagulation alone can decrease the mortality rate to less than 5%, but cannot be used universally in all patient populations. The advent of the inferior vena cava filter has drastically changed the management of patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis and a contraindication to anticoagulation. Developed in the 1940s, this device has evolved into a modality that has proven effective at preventing life-threatening pulmonary emboli. Mechanical caval interruption devices have since improved as well, including a significant decrease in delivery sheath size, which aids in achieving post-procedural hemostasis. Because of these improvements, IVC filter placement has changed from a procedure performed exclusively in the operating room with venotomy to a bedside percutaneous procedure using ultrasound guidance. Successful use of transabdominal duplex ultrasound and IVUS eliminate the need for radiocontrast dye administration thus avoiding the known risk of renal failure and anaphylaxis. Other advantages include decreased radiation exposure to the patient and hospital personnel, reduced need for patient transport, and decreased cost compared to traditional placement in the operating room suite. In a cost containment era, it is feasible to think that future mechanical caval interruption will occur more commonly at the bedside than in the traditional operating theater.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Garber K. The clot stopper. Am Herit Invent Technol. 2006;22(1):34–9.
Killingsworth CD, Taylor SM, Patterson MA, Weinberg JA, McGwin Jr G, Melton SM, Reiff DA, Kerby JD, Rue LW, Jordan Jr WD, Passman MA. Prospective implementation of an algorithm for bedside intravascular ultrasound-guided filter placement in critically ill patients. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5):1215–21.
Spaniolas K, Velmahos GC, Kwolek C, Gervasini A, De Moya M, Alam HB. Bedsideplacement of removable vena cava filters guided by intravascular ultrasound in the critically injured. World J Surg. 2008;32(7):1438–43.
Aidinian G, Fox CJ, White PW, Cox MW, Adams ED, Gillespie DL. Intravascular ultrasound – guided inferior vena cava filter placement in the military multi-trauma patients: a single-center experience. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009;43(5):497–501.
Kardys CM, Stoner MC, Manwaring ML, Barker M, Macdonald KG, Pender JR, Chapman 3rd WH. Safety and efficacy of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filter in super obese bariatric patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(1):50–4. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
Nicolaou S, Talsky A, Khashoggi K, Venu V. Ultrasound-guided interventional radiology in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 Suppl):S186–97. Review.
Chiou AC. Intravascular ultrasound-guided bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters. Semin Vasc Surg. 2006;19(3):150–4. Review.
Uppal B, Flinn WR, Benjamin ME. The bedside insertion of inferior vena cava filters using ultrasound guidance. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2007;19(1):78–84.
Corriere MA, Passman MA, Guzman RJ, et al. Comparison of bedside transabdominal duplex ultrasotmd versus contrast venography for inferior vena cava filter placement: what is the best imaging modality? Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19:229–34.
Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Levitt AB, et al. Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the bedside under intravascular ultrasOlmd guidance in patients with multiple trauma. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:958–64.
Garrett IV, Passman MA, Guzman RJ, et al. Expanding options for bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters with intravascular ultrasound when transabdominal duplex ultrasound imaging is inadequate. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:329–34.
Gamblin TC, Ashley DW, Burch S, et al. A prospective evaluation of a bedside tedmique for placement of inferior vena cava filters: accuracy and limitations of intravascular ultrasound. Am Surg. 2003;69:382–6.
Wellons ED, Matsuura JH, Shuler BW, et al. Bedside intravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:455–8.
Conners MS, Becker S, Guzman RJ, et al. Duplex scan-directed placement of inferior vena cava filters: a five-year institutional experience. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:286–91.
Ashley DW, Gamblin TC, Burch ST, et al. Accurate deployment of vena cava filters: comparison of intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography. J Trauma. 2001;50:975–81.
Ebaugh JL, Chiou AC, Morasch MD, et al. Bedside vena cava filter placement guided with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:21–6.
Bonn J, Liu JB, Eschelman DJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound as an alternative to positive-contrast vena cavography prior to filter placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:843–9.
Sato DT, Robinson KD, Gregory RT, et al. Duplex directed caval filter insertion in multi-trauma and critically ill patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13:365–71.
Benjamin ME, Sandager GP, Cohn EL, et al. Duplex ultrasound insertion of inferior vena cava filters in multitrauma patients. Am J Surg. 1999;178:92–7.
Neuzil DF, Garrard CL, Berkman RA, et al. Duplex-directed vena caval filter placement: report of initial experience. Surgery. 1998;123:470–4.
Neuzil DF, Naslund TC, Bass JG, et al. Cost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;43:752–8.
Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive·review. Blood. 2000;195:3669–77.
Passman MA, Dattilo JB, Guzman RJ, et al. Bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters by using transabdominal duplex ultrasonography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:1027–32.
Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG. Gregory Elliott acute pulmonary embolism: part I: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circulation. 2003;108:2726–9.
Desciak MC, Martin DE. Perioperative pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and anesthetic management. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(2):153–65.
Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB, et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the society of interventional radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:449–59.
Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Jan SC. Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to i.v. nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1643–7.
Fanara B, Manzon C, Barbot O, Desmettre T, Capellier G. Recommendations for intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R87.
Szem JW, Hydo LJ, Fischer E, et al. High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary “road trip”. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1660–6.
Steady HE. Patient’s outcome: intrahospital transportation and monitoring of critically ill patients by a specially trained ICU nursing staff. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:282–7.
Chiou AC. Intravascular ultrasound-guided bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters. Semin Vasc Surg. 2006;19:150–4.
Rectenwald JE, Greenfield LJ, Henke PK, et al. Vena caval interruption procedures. In: Rutherford RB, editor. Vascular surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 1086–94.
Janjua M, Omran FM, Kastoon T, et al. Inferior vena cava filter migration: updated review and case presentation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:606–10.
Wu GS, Gilet A, Kirshbaum M, et al. Inferior vena cava filter migration with severe deformity of filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1257–9.
Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:425–40.
Kinney TB, Rose SC, Weingarten KE, et al. IVC filter tilt and asymmetry: comparison of the over-the-wire stainless-steel and titanium Greenfield IVC filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:1029–37.
Ganguli S, Tham JC, Komlos F, et al. Fracture and migration of a suprarenal inferior vena cava filter in a pregnant patient. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1707–11.
Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC. Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filter. Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;3:199–205.
Turba UC, Glaiberman C, Picus D, et al. Management of severe vena cava filter tilting: experience with bard G2 filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:449–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fisher, B.T., Naslund, T.C. (2013). Ultrasound-Guided Cava Filter Placement. In: AbuRahma, A., Bandyk, D. (eds) Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4005-4_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4005-4_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4004-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4005-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)