Skip to main content

Ultrasound-Guided Cava Filter Placement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism from deep venous thrombosis reduces the cross-sectional area of the pulmonary vascular bed, resulting in an incremental increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and subsequent increased right ventricular afterload. Thus, large or recurrent pulmonary emboli can be fatal. Anticoagulation alone can decrease the mortality rate to less than 5%, but cannot be used universally in all patient populations. The advent of the inferior vena cava filter has drastically changed the management of patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis and a contraindication to anticoagulation. Developed in the 1940s, this device has evolved into a modality that has proven effective at preventing life-threatening pulmonary emboli. Mechanical caval interruption devices have since improved as well, including a significant decrease in delivery sheath size, which aids in achieving post-procedural hemostasis. Because of these improvements, IVC filter placement has changed from a procedure performed exclusively in the operating room with venotomy to a bedside percutaneous procedure using ultrasound guidance. Successful use of transabdominal duplex ultrasound and IVUS eliminate the need for radiocontrast dye administration thus avoiding the known risk of renal failure and anaphylaxis. Other advantages include decreased radiation exposure to the patient and hospital personnel, reduced need for patient transport, and decreased cost compared to traditional placement in the operating room suite. In a cost containment era, it is feasible to think that future mechanical caval interruption will occur more commonly at the bedside than in the traditional operating theater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Garber K. The clot stopper. Am Herit Invent Technol. 2006;22(1):34–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Killingsworth CD, Taylor SM, Patterson MA, Weinberg JA, McGwin Jr G, Melton SM, Reiff DA, Kerby JD, Rue LW, Jordan Jr WD, Passman MA. Prospective implementation of an algorithm for bedside intravascular ultrasound-guided filter placement in critically ill patients. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5):1215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spaniolas K, Velmahos GC, Kwolek C, Gervasini A, De Moya M, Alam HB. Bedsideplacement of removable vena cava filters guided by intravascular ultrasound in the critically injured. World J Surg. 2008;32(7):1438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aidinian G, Fox CJ, White PW, Cox MW, Adams ED, Gillespie DL. Intravascular ultrasound – guided inferior vena cava filter placement in the military multi-trauma patients: a single-center experience. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009;43(5):497–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kardys CM, Stoner MC, Manwaring ML, Barker M, Macdonald KG, Pender JR, Chapman 3rd WH. Safety and efficacy of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filter in super obese bariatric patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(1):50–4. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolaou S, Talsky A, Khashoggi K, Venu V. Ultrasound-guided interventional radiology in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 Suppl):S186–97. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiou AC. Intravascular ultrasound-guided bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters. Semin Vasc Surg. 2006;19(3):150–4. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uppal B, Flinn WR, Benjamin ME. The bedside insertion of inferior vena cava filters using ultrasound guidance. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2007;19(1):78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Corriere MA, Passman MA, Guzman RJ, et al. Comparison of bedside transabdominal duplex ultrasotmd versus contrast venography for inferior vena cava filter placement: what is the best imaging modality? Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Levitt AB, et al. Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the bedside under intravascular ultrasOlmd guidance in patients with multiple trauma. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:958–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garrett IV, Passman MA, Guzman RJ, et al. Expanding options for bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters with intravascular ultrasound when transabdominal duplex ultrasound imaging is inadequate. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:329–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gamblin TC, Ashley DW, Burch S, et al. A prospective evaluation of a bedside tedmique for placement of inferior vena cava filters: accuracy and limitations of intravascular ultrasound. Am Surg. 2003;69:382–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wellons ED, Matsuura JH, Shuler BW, et al. Bedside intravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:455–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Conners MS, Becker S, Guzman RJ, et al. Duplex scan-directed placement of inferior vena cava filters: a five-year institutional experience. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:286–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashley DW, Gamblin TC, Burch ST, et al. Accurate deployment of vena cava filters: comparison of intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography. J Trauma. 2001;50:975–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebaugh JL, Chiou AC, Morasch MD, et al. Bedside vena cava filter placement guided with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:21–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonn J, Liu JB, Eschelman DJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound as an alternative to positive-contrast vena cavography prior to filter placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:843–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato DT, Robinson KD, Gregory RT, et al. Duplex directed caval filter insertion in multi-trauma and critically ill patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Benjamin ME, Sandager GP, Cohn EL, et al. Duplex ultrasound insertion of inferior vena cava filters in multitrauma patients. Am J Surg. 1999;178:92–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Neuzil DF, Garrard CL, Berkman RA, et al. Duplex-directed vena caval filter placement: report of initial experience. Surgery. 1998;123:470–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neuzil DF, Naslund TC, Bass JG, et al. Cost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;43:752–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive·review. Blood. 2000;195:3669–77.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Passman MA, Dattilo JB, Guzman RJ, et al. Bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters by using transabdominal duplex ultrasonography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:1027–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG. Gregory Elliott acute pulmonary embolism: part I: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circulation. 2003;108:2726–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Desciak MC, Martin DE. Perioperative pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and anesthetic management. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(2):153–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB, et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the society of interventional radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:449–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Jan SC. Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to i.v. nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1643–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fanara B, Manzon C, Barbot O, Desmettre T, Capellier G. Recommendations for intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Szem JW, Hydo LJ, Fischer E, et al. High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary “road trip”. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1660–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Steady HE. Patient’s outcome: intrahospital transportation and monitoring of critically ill patients by a specially trained ICU nursing staff. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:282–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chiou AC. Intravascular ultrasound-guided bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters. Semin Vasc Surg. 2006;19:150–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rectenwald JE, Greenfield LJ, Henke PK, et al. Vena caval interruption procedures. In: Rutherford RB, editor. Vascular surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 1086–94.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Janjua M, Omran FM, Kastoon T, et al. Inferior vena cava filter migration: updated review and case presentation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:606–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu GS, Gilet A, Kirshbaum M, et al. Inferior vena cava filter migration with severe deformity of filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1257–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:425–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kinney TB, Rose SC, Weingarten KE, et al. IVC filter tilt and asymmetry: comparison of the over-the-wire stainless-steel and titanium Greenfield IVC filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:1029–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ganguli S, Tham JC, Komlos F, et al. Fracture and migration of a suprarenal inferior vena cava filter in a pregnant patient. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1707–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC. Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filter. Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;3:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Turba UC, Glaiberman C, Picus D, et al. Management of severe vena cava filter tilting: experience with bard G2 filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:449–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. Naslund M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, B.T., Naslund, T.C. (2013). Ultrasound-Guided Cava Filter Placement. In: AbuRahma, A., Bandyk, D. (eds) Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4005-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4005-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4004-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4005-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics