Abstract
The term “controlled clinical trials” at a minimum implies testing whether a prospectively administered intervention (a drug, diet, activity or other therapy) prevents, stabilizes or ameliorates clinical polyneuropathy to a clinically beneficial degree when compared with a sham intervention, similar in all respects to the intervention with the exception that the intervention is not included. It is also understood that neither the investigators or patients can identify the intervention from the sham intervention except perhaps by the response. The term “controlled clinical trial” also implies rigorous pre-planning, written design, choice of carefully selected outcomes, estimation of statistical power, written permission agreed to, and supervised by, an institutional review board, periodic evaluation for safety, meticulous record keeping, quality assurance and detailed statistical analysis. Often controlled clinical trials are multicenter studies and funded by a pharmaceutical house, disease advocacy agency or governmental research agency. Typically, the study is registered, modified and monitored by an agency such as the Federal Drug Administration (FDA; in the USA).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dyck PJ, Litchy WJ, Kratz KM, et al. A plasma exchange versus immune globulin infusion trial in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 838.
Dyck PJ, Low PA, Windebank AJ, et al. Plasma exchange in polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1482.
Dyck PJ, Dyck PJB, Grant IA, Fealey RD. Ten steps in characterizing and diagnosing patients with peripheral neuropathy. Neurology 1996; 47: 10.
Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Litchy WJ, O’Brien PC. Longitudinal assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy using a composite score in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort. Neurology 1997; 49: 229.
Dyck PJ, Kratz KM, Karnes JL, et al. The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Neurology 1993; 43: 817.
Dyck PJ, Sherman WR, Hallcher LM, et al. Human diabetic endoneurial sorbitol, fructose, and myo-inositol related to sural nerve morphometry. Ann Neurol 1980; 8: 590.
Dyck PJ, Karnes J, O’Brien PC, Swanson CJ. Neuropathy symptom profile in health, motor neuron disease, diabetic neuropathy, and amyloidosis. Neurology 1986; 36: 1300.
Dyck PJ, Litchy WJ, Lehman KA, Hokanson JL, Low PA, O’Brien PC. Variables influencing neuropathic endpoints: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study of Healthy Subjects (RDNS-HS). Neurology 1995; 45: 1115.
O’Brien PC, Dyck PJ. Procedures for setting normal values. Neurology 1995; 45: 17.
Low PA. Clinical autonomic disorders: evaluation and management. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.
Dyck PJ. Diabetic polyneuropathy in controlled clinical trials: consensus report of the Peripheral Nerve Society. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 478.
O’Brien PC. Procedures for comparny samples with multiple endpoints. Biometrics 1984; 40: 1079–1088.
Guillain-Barré syndrome Steroid Trial Group. Double blind trial of intravenous methylprednisolone in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Lancet 1993; 341: 586–590.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dyck, P.J., O’Brien, P. (2001). Peripheral Neuropathies: Controlled Clinical Trials. In: Guiloff, R.J. (eds) Clinical Trials in Neurology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3787-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3787-0_36
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-856-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3787-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive