Abstract
This article is about a farm — a virtual farm, to be precise. Here, a farmer lives together with his cow and a few other animals. He and his cow don’t see eye to eye on many things. In fact, they are involved in a continuous domestic drama. The farmer likes order and wants the cow to be in its shed. Unfortunately, the cow likes freedom and tries to escape whenever the farmer has caught it. As the two antagonists are equally stubborn, the conflict can go on forever. This farm, with its ongoing conflicts, came into being because of a research project sponsored by the EEC. The aim of the project was to investigate what it takes to construct a virtual puppet theatre. As dramaturges our role in the project was first and foremost to work out scenarios that would work in a computer-based theatre.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blumberg, B. and Kline, C. (1999) The art and science of synthetic character design. In Proceedings of AISB 1999 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Entertainment and Visual Art, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Boal, A. (1980) Stop! C’est magique. Paris: Hachette.
Bolton, G. (1979) Towards a Theory of Drama in Education. Burnt Mill: Longman.
Bolton, G. (1984) Drama in Education. An Argument for Placing Drama at the Centre of the Curriculum. London: Longman.
Buytendijk, J. F. (1933) Wesen und Sinn des Spiels. Berlin: Kurt Wolf.
Eco, U. (1989) The Open Work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Greimas, A. J. (1986) Sémantique structurale. Paris: PUF.
Hornbrook, D. (1989) Education and Dramatic Art. Oxford: Blackwell Education.
Johnstone, K. (1981) Impro. Improvisation and the Theatre. London: Methuen.
Kjølner, T. and Szatkowski, J. (2002) Dramaturgy in building multimedia performances: devising and analyzing. In Halskov Madsen, K. (ed.) Virtual Staging: Staging of Virtual Inhabited 3D Worlds. London: Springer.
Lambert, A. and O’Neill, C. (1982) Drama Structures. London: Hutchinson.
Landau, G.P. (1997) Hypertext 2.0. The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Laurel, B. (1991) Computers as Theatre. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Madsen, C. and Granum, E. (2001) Aspects of Interactive Autonomy and Perception. In Qvortrup, L. (ed.) Virtual Interaction: Interaction in Virtual Inhabited 3D Worlds London: Springer.
Microsoft (1996) The 3D Movie Maker. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corp.
Spolin, V. (1983) Improvisation for the Theatre. A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Stubenrauch, H. and Ziehe, T. (1982) Plädoyer für ein ungewöhnliches Lernen. Hamburg: Rohwohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
Szatkowski, J. (1989) Dramaturgiske modeller. Om dramaturgisk tekstanalyse. In Christoffersen, E., Kjølner, T. and Szatkowski, J. (eds.), Dramaturgisk analyse. En antologi. Aarhus: Aktuelle Teaterproblemer.
The Living Theatre (1971) Paradise Now. New York: Random House.
Witkin, R. W. (1974) The Intelligence of Feeling. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lehmann, N., Szatkowski, J. (2004). Theatrical Virtuality — Virtual Theatricality. In: Andersen, P., Qvortrup, L. (eds) Virtual Applications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3746-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3746-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-891-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3746-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive