Abstract
The transmission network plays a key role in making the competitive electricity market work and the first important step in any power industry restructuring is open access to transmission. Transmission services have been unbundled from generation to form separate businesses, however, when regarded as a natural monopoly the transmission sector remains more or less regulated to permit a competitive environment for generation and retail services. The operating and planning of the transmission network and the pricing of transmission services are still seen as challenges in the development of electricity markets on both theoretical and practical grounds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Surrey: “The British Electricity Experiment–Privatization: the Record, the Issues, the Lessons”, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 1996
OFFER, The New Electricity Trading Arrangements, July 1999, UK
California ISO Scheduling Applications Implementation: Functional Requirements, December 1996, http://www.energyonline.com/wepex/reports/reports2. html#ISO_bus
FERC, ‘Order No. 2000, Regional Transmission Organization (RTO)-Final Rule’, http://www.ferc.fed.us/news1/rules/pages/rulemake.htm, December 20, 1999
European Transmission System Operators (ETSO), Evaluation of Congestion Management Methods for Cross-border Transmission”, November 1999
J. Makansi: “California’s Electricity Crisis Rooted in Many Failings”, IEEE Spectrum, Feb 2001, pp. 24–25
J.D. Chandley, S.M. Harvey, and W.W. Hogan: “Electricity Market Reform in California”, http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/people/whogan/, November 2000
R. D. Christie, and I. Wangensteen,: “The Energy Market in Norway and Sweden: Congestion Management”, IEEE Power Engineering Review, May 1998, pp. 61–63
H. Singh, S. Hao, and A. Papalexopoulos,: “Transmission Congestion Management in Competitive Electricity Markets”, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, May 1998, pp. 672–679
R.S. Fang, and A.K. David: “Transmission Congestion Management in an Electricity Market”, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, August 1999, pp. 877–883
K. David: “Dispatch Methodologies for Open Access Transmission Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, February 1998, pp. 46–53
X. Wang, and Y.H. Song: “Advanced Real-Time Congestion Management through Both Pool Balancing Market and Bilateral Market”, IEEE Power Engineering Review, Feb 2000, 20 (2), pp. 47–49
S.M. Harvey, W.W. Hogan, and A.L. Pope: “Transmission Capacity Reservations and Transmission Congestion Contracts”, Harvard Electricity Policy Group, Harvard University, June 1996
OFFER, “Review of Electricity Trading Arrangement. Background Paper 1: Electricity Trading Arrangements in England and Wales”, February 1998
OFFER, “Review of Electricity Trading Arrangement. Background Paper 2: Electricity Trading Arrangements in Other Countries”, February 1998
PJM Interconnection, www.pjm.com
Transpower of New Zealand, www.transpower.co.nz
N. Deeb and S.M. Shahidehpour: “Linear Reactive Power Optimization In A Large Power Network Using The Decomposition Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 5, May 1990, pp. 428–438
B.H. Kim and R. Baldick: “Coarse-Grained Distributed Optimal Power Flow”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, May 1997, 12 (2), pp. 932–939
A.J. Conejo and J.A. Aguado: “Multi-area Coordinated Decentralized DC Optimal Power Flow”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, November 1998, 13 (4), pp. 1272–1278
F.J. Nogales, F.J. Prieto, and A.J. Conejo: “Multi-area AC optimal power flow: a new decomposition approach”, Proceeding of the 13th Power System Computer Conference, June 28-July 2, 1999, pp. 1201–1206
M.D. Cadwalader, S.M. Harvey, W.W. Hogan, and S.L. Pope: “Coordinating congestion relief across multiple regions”, http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/people/whogan/, Oct 7 1999
S.S. Oren and A.M. Ross: “Economic Congestion Relief Across Multiple Regions Requires Tradable Physical Flow-gate Rights”, http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDFDown.html, May 2000
OFGEM, “Transmission Access and Losses under NETA: A Consultation Document”, May 2001
M.E. Bradley, U. Bryan, D. Waterhouse, and C.E. Fiford: “Optimisation of Transmission System Constraints in Real Time”, GIGRE Symposium on the Impact of Open Trading on Power Systems, Tours, 1997
http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/rts/pg_tcarts.htm
J. Eckstein: “Parallel Alternating Direction Multiplier Decomposition of Convex Programs”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, January 1994, 80 (1), pp. 39–63
X. Wang, Y.H. Song, and Q. Lu: “A Lagrangian Decomposition Approach to Active Power Congestion Management across Interconnected Regions”, IEE Proceeding C, Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 148, No. 5, September 2001, pp. 497–503
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, X., Song, Y.H., Lu, Q. (2003). Transmission Congestion Management. In: Song, YH., Wang, XF. (eds) Operation of Market-oriented Power Systems. Power Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3735-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3735-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-893-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3735-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive