Abstract
Head-based and eye-based assistive technology pointing devices, or head and eye mice, are used to enable computer control in a similar manner to standard mice, by simply moving the cursor to where a user is pointing either with their head or their eyes. These devices have been in existence for many years within the motor-disabled community and over this time there has been widespread acceptance and adoption of head mice, with many disabled people using these devices to access computers and communication devices. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that eye-based pointing is widely and quickly dismissed as a usable means of pointing in assistive technology due to difficulty of use and inaccuracy, making the potential advantages of eye-based pointing difficult to realise in the face of such quick decisions not to use this approach. It is necessary to understand in detail what the limitations of eye-based pointing are and how these can be overcome. Making relative performance comparisons with head-based pointing can usefully do this, as this is an established technique of assistive technology pointing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bates R (1999) Multimodal Eye-based Interaction for Zoomed Target Selection on a Standard Graphical User Interface. In: Proceedings of Interact’99, British Computer Society, vol. II, pp7–8
Carpenter RHS (1991) Eye movements, MacMillan
Carpenter RHS (1991) Eye movements, MacMillan Jacob RJK (1991) The Use of Eye Movements in Human-Computer Interaction Techniques: What You Look At is What You Get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9(3): 152–169
Jacob RJK (1995) Eye Tracking in Advanced Interface Design. In: Barfield W, Furness T (eds.) Advanced Interface Design and Virtual Environments, Oxford University Press, 258–288
Macleod M, Bowden R, Bevan N, Curson I (1997) The MUSiC performance measurement method. Behaviour and Information Technology 16(4–5): 279–293
Saito S (1992) Does Fatigue Exist in a Quantitative Measurement of Eye Movements? Ergonomics 35(5–6): 607–615
Salvucci DD, Anderson JR (2000) Intelligent gaze-added interfaces. In: Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press, vol. 2, pp 273–280
Sibert LE, Jacob RJK (2000) Evaluation of eye gaze interaction In: Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press, vol. 2, pp 281–288
Szczur M (1994) Usability testing — on a budget: a NASA usability test case study. Behaviour and Information Technology 13(1–2): 106–118
Velichkovsky B, Sprenger A, Unema P (1997) Towards Gaze Mediated Interaction: Collecting Solutions of the “Midas Touch” Problem. In: Howard S, Hammond J, Lindgaard G (eds.) Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction, Chapman & Hall
Ware C, Mikaelian HH (1987) An Evaluation of an Eye Tracker as a Device for Computer Input. In: Proceedings of CHI 1987, ACM Press
Yarbus AL (1967) Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum, New York
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bates, R., Istance, H.O. (2002). Why Are Eye Mice Unpopular? — A Detailed Comparison of Head and Eye Controlled Assistive Technology Pointing Devices. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P. (eds) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3721-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3719-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive