Skip to main content

Why Are Eye Mice Unpopular? — A Detailed Comparison of Head and Eye Controlled Assistive Technology Pointing Devices

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Head-based and eye-based assistive technology pointing devices, or head and eye mice, are used to enable computer control in a similar manner to standard mice, by simply moving the cursor to where a user is pointing either with their head or their eyes. These devices have been in existence for many years within the motor-disabled community and over this time there has been widespread acceptance and adoption of head mice, with many disabled people using these devices to access computers and communication devices. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that eye-based pointing is widely and quickly dismissed as a usable means of pointing in assistive technology due to difficulty of use and inaccuracy, making the potential advantages of eye-based pointing difficult to realise in the face of such quick decisions not to use this approach. It is necessary to understand in detail what the limitations of eye-based pointing are and how these can be overcome. Making relative performance comparisons with head-based pointing can usefully do this, as this is an established technique of assistive technology pointing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bates R (1999) Multimodal Eye-based Interaction for Zoomed Target Selection on a Standard Graphical User Interface. In: Proceedings of Interact’99, British Computer Society, vol. II, pp7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RHS (1991) Eye movements, MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RHS (1991) Eye movements, MacMillan Jacob RJK (1991) The Use of Eye Movements in Human-Computer Interaction Techniques: What You Look At is What You Get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9(3): 152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob RJK (1995) Eye Tracking in Advanced Interface Design. In: Barfield W, Furness T (eds.) Advanced Interface Design and Virtual Environments, Oxford University Press, 258–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod M, Bowden R, Bevan N, Curson I (1997) The MUSiC performance measurement method. Behaviour and Information Technology 16(4–5): 279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito S (1992) Does Fatigue Exist in a Quantitative Measurement of Eye Movements? Ergonomics 35(5–6): 607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci DD, Anderson JR (2000) Intelligent gaze-added interfaces. In: Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press, vol. 2, pp 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibert LE, Jacob RJK (2000) Evaluation of eye gaze interaction In: Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press, vol. 2, pp 281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczur M (1994) Usability testing — on a budget: a NASA usability test case study. Behaviour and Information Technology 13(1–2): 106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky B, Sprenger A, Unema P (1997) Towards Gaze Mediated Interaction: Collecting Solutions of the “Midas Touch” Problem. In: Howard S, Hammond J, Lindgaard G (eds.) Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction, Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware C, Mikaelian HH (1987) An Evaluation of an Eye Tracker as a Device for Computer Input. In: Proceedings of CHI 1987, ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus AL (1967) Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bates, R., Istance, H.O. (2002). Why Are Eye Mice Unpopular? — A Detailed Comparison of Head and Eye Controlled Assistive Technology Pointing Devices. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P. (eds) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3721-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3719-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics