Abstract
This chapter seeks to challenge the division between assistive technology and design in general and argues that boundaries should be blurred: not only should design become more inclusive, but assistive technology should involve industrial and interaction designers in order to better balance emotional and functional needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Evamy M (1997) Able bodies. Design, Spring 1997, pp 20–23
Hillman MR, Pullin GM, Gammie AR, Orpwood RD, Stammers CW (1990) Development of a robot arm and workstation for the disabled. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 12: 199–204
Myerson J (2001) IDEO: Masters of innovation. Laurence King, p 157
Pullin G (1993) Prosthetic hand. MDesRCA thesis, Royal College of Art, DIC thesis, Imperial College, London
Pullin G (1992) The design of a robotic manipulator for disabled users. MPhil thesis, University of Bath
Pullin G (1991) The importance of aesthetics in the design of rehabilitation robotics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Atlanta, Georgia, pp 124–133
Pullin G (1986) Keyboard emulator for disabled children. BA report, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pullin, G. (2002). “I can’t talk now,” and Other Design Stories: Four Assistive Technologies for People With and Without Disabilities. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P. (eds) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_29
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3721-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3719-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive