Abstract
This chapter describes the development of the Schemebuilder computer-supported methodology for the conceptual design of mechatronic and other multidisciplinary systems. This employed function-means trees, implemented using an artificial-intelligence-derived context management system, hierarchical schematic diagrams, and bond graph theory. Together, these allowed the generation of complete design schemes by creating, and forming combinations of, alternative partial design solutions. Quantitative dynamic simulation models were automatically created for the evaluation of the generated schemes. An illustrative example shows how the step-by-step application of Schemebuilder’s bond-graph-based rules were used to synthesise,from first principles, a novel and eventually commercially successful concept for a remote telechiric manipulator.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buur J. A theoretical approach to mechatronics design. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, 1990.
Bracewell RH, Chaplin RV, Bradley DA. Schemebuilder and layout-computer based tools to aid in the design of mechatronic systems. In: IMechE Conference on Mechatronics — The Integration of Engineering Design, Dundee, 1992; 1–7.
Bracewell RH, Sharpe JEE. Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation — Schemebuilder. Representing functionality in design [special issue] Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 1996;10(4):333–46.
Ringstad P. A comparison of two approaches for functional decomposition-the function/means tree and the axiomatic approach. In: 11th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 97), Tampere, Finland, 1997.
Pahl G, Beitz W. Engineering design. The Design Council, 1984.
Yourdon E. Modern structured analysis. Prentice-Hall, 1989.
French MJ. Conceptual design for engineers. London: Design Council, 1985.
Hundal MS. A systematic method for developing function structures, solutions & concept variants. Mech Mach Theory 1990;25(3):243–56.
Andreasen MM. Syntesemetoder på systemgrundlag. Ph.D. thesis, Lund Technical University, Lund, Sweden, 1980.
Sturges RH, O’Shaughnessy K, Reed RG. A systematic approach to conceptual design. Concurr Eng Res Appl 1993;1:93–105.
Hansen CT. An approach to simultaneous synthesis and optimization of composite mechanical systems. J Eng Des 1995;6(3):249–66.
Malmqvist J, Schachinger P. Towards an implementation of the chromosome model-focusing the design specification. In: 11th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 97), Tampere, Finland, 1997.
Welch RV, Dixon JR. Guiding conceptual design through behavioural reasoning. Res Eng Des 1994;6(3):169–88.
Logan B, Millington K, Smithers T. Being economical with the truth: assumption-based context management in the Edinburgh designer system: In First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, Edinburgh, UK, 1991.
Filman RE. Reasoning with worlds and truth maintenance in a knowledge-based programming environment, Commun ACM 1988;31(4):382–401.
Yan XT, Sharpe JEE. Unified dynamic mixed mode simulation of mechatronic product design schemes. In: International Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster University, 1994; 259–80.
Banares-Alcantara R, Lababidi HMS. Design support systems for process engineering — II: KBDS: an experimental prototype. Comput Chem Eng 1995;19:279–301.
De Kleer J. An assumption-based TMS. Artif Intell 1986;28:127–62.
The Modelica Association. Modelica — a unified object-oriented language for physical systems modeling: tutorial accessed 18 April 2001, from http://www.Modelica.org/current/ModelicaTutoriall4.pdf, v1.4, 2000.
Forbus KD. Qualitative process theory. Artif Intell 1984;24(3):85–168.
Paynter HM. Analysis and design of engineering systems. Cambridge (USA): MIT Press, 1961.
Karnopp DC, Margolis DL, Rosenberg RC. System dynamics: a unified approach. Chichester: Wiley, 1990.
Iwasaki Y, Vescovi M, Fikes RE, Chandrasekaran B. Causal functional representation language with behavior-based semantics. Appl Artif Intell 1995;9:5–31.
Tomiyama T, Umeda Y, Ishii M. Knowledge systematization for a knowledge intensive engineering framework. In: IFIP WG 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD, Espoo, Finland, 1995; 55–80.
Ulrich KT, Seering WR Synthesis of schematic descriptions in mechanical design. Res. Eng Des 1989;1(1):3–18.
Finger S, Rinderle JR. A transformational approach to mechanical design using a bond graph grammar. In: Design Theory and Methodology — DTM’89, DE-vol. 17, 1989; 107–15.
Bracewell RH, Bradley DA, Chaplin RV, Langdon PM, Sharpe JEE. Schemebuilder: a design aid for the conceptual stages of product design. In: 9th International Conference on Engineering Design, The Hague, 1993; 1311–8.
Yan XT, Sharpe JEE. Reasoning and truth maintenance of causal structures in interdisciplinary product modelling and simulation. In: International Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster University — Ambleside Campus. London: Springer, 1995; 405–25.
De Vries TJA, Breedveld PC, Meindertsma P. Polymorphic modelling of engineering systems. In: International Conference on Bond Graph Modelling ICBGM’93, La Jolla, CA. The Society for Computer Simulation: 1993; 17–22.
Bradley DA, Bracewell RH, Chaplin RV. Engineering design & mechatronics-the Schemebuilder project. Res Eng Des 1993;4(4):241–8.
Sharpe JEE. Application of bond graphs to the synthesis and analysis of telechirs and robots. In: 3rd Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Third International CISM-IFFToMM Symposium, Udine, Italy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978; 217–27.
Bracewell RH, Sharpe JEE. The use of bond graph reasoning for the design of interdisciplinary schemes. In: International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation (ICBGM’95), Las Vegas, vol. 27(1). SCS Publishing, 1995; 116–21.
Counsell JM. Design principles for mechatronic systems. In: Computer Aided Conceptual Design’97: Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster University, 1997; 17–26.
Giarratano J, Riley G. Expert systems: principles and programming. Boston (MA): PWS Publishing, 1994.
Bracewell RH, Sharpe JEE. Computer-aided methodology for the development of conceptual schemes for mixed energy-transforming and real-time information systems. In: International Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster University, 1994; 79–94.
Langdon PM, Cheung HE A hypertext documentation system for Schemebuilder: the ‘mechatronics’ book. In: Joint Hungarian-British Mechatronics Conference, Budapest, 1994.
Kota S, Lee CL. A functional framework for hydraulic systems design using abstraction/decomposition hierarchies. In: ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference, Boston, MA, 1990; 327–40.
Porter I. Schemebuilder mechatronics. In Engineering Design Conference ‘98: Design Reuse, Brunei University, 1998; 561–8.
Bracewell RH, Wallace KM. Designing a representation to support function-means based synthesis of mechanical design solutions. Accepted for International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01 Glasgow, August 21–23, 2001.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bracewell, R. (2002). Synthesis based on function-means trees: Schemebuilder. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Engineering Design Synthesis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3717-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3717-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-876-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3717-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive