Advertisement

Improved Relay Feedback

  • Cheng-Ching Yu
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

Luyben (1987) pioneers the use of relay feedback tests for system identification. The ultimate gain and ultimate frequency from the relay feedback test are used to fit a typical transfer function (e.g., first-, second- or third-order plus time delay system). As mentioned in Chapter 2, it can lead to significant errors in the ultimate gain and ultimate frequency approximation (e.g., 5 ~ 20% error in K u ) for typical transfer functions in a control system. The errors come from the linear approximation (describing function analysis) to a nonlinear element. The square type of output from the relay is approximated with the principal harmonic from the Fourier transform (Antherton, 1982; Chang et al., 1992) and the ultimate gain is computed accordingly. Several attempts have been proposed to overcome this inaccuracy. Li et al. (1991) use two relay tests to improve the estimation of K u and ω u . Chang et al. (1992) employ the concept of a discrete time system to give a better estimation of ω u . Notice that, in these attempts, an ideal relay is employed in the experiments and modifications are made afterward. Since, the source of the error comes from sine-wave approximation of a square type of oscillation, a straightforward approach to overcome the inaccuracy is to re-design the experiment (instead of taking remedial action afterward). That is, to produce a more sine-wave like output using a different type of relay.

Keywords

Time Delay System Distillation Column Sinusoidal Wave Nonlinear Element Sustained Oscillation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Atherton, D. P. Nonlinear Control Engineering. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1982.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chang, R. C.; Shen, S. H.; Yu, C. C. “Derivation of Transfer Function from Relay Feedback Systems”. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31, 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Li, W.; Eskinat, E.; Luyben, W. L. “An Improved Autotune Identification Method”. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991, 30, 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Luyben, W. L. “Derivation of Transfer Functions for Highly Nonlinear Distillation Columns”. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26, 2490.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Papastathopoulou, H. S.; Luyben, W. L. “Tuning Controllers on Distillation Columns with The Distillate-Bottoms Structure”. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1990, 29, 1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Shen, S. H.; Yu, C. C. “Indirect Feedforward Control: Multivariable Systems”. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47, 3085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sung, S. W.; Park, J. H.; Lee, I. B. “Modified Relay Feedback Method” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 29, 4133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wood, R. K.; Berry, M. W. “Terminal Composition Control of a Binary Distillation Column”. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1973, 28, 707.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng-Ching Yu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Taiwan University of Science & TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations