The Problem of Defining Objects: A Critical Evaluation of Coad and Yourdon’s Object Oriented Analysis Using the Nimsad Framework
In Object Oriented Analysis by Coad and Yourdon the concept of ‘object’ is considered to have identity, state, behaviour and properties and can be characterised by a set of operations that can be performed on it or by it and its possible states. It is not explained in terms of any meta-level model of human sense-making. That is objects are not defined rather they are described.
This paper critically evaluates Coad and Yourdon’s Object Oriented Analysis (1990), using the NIMSAD framework, with an emphasis on the criteria used to identify objects.
KeywordsProblem Domain Problem Situation Object Orient Potential Object Mental Construct
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bouzeghoub, M., G. Gardarin, et al. (1997). Object Technology Concepts and Methods, International Thomson Computer Press.Google Scholar
- Coad, P and Yourdon, E (1990) Object Oriented Analysis, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
- Conger, S. (1994). The New software Engineering. Belmont, California, International Thomson Publishing.Google Scholar
- DeMarco (1979). Structured Analysis, Yourdon Press.Google Scholar
- Fichman, R G. and Kemerer, C F (1992). Object-oriented and Conventional analysis and design methodologies: comparison and critique. IEEE Computer October 1992Google Scholar
- Jayaratna, N. (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, P. (1994). Information-Systems Development, Pitman.Google Scholar
- Yourdon, E. (1989). Modern Structured Analysis, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar