Skip to main content
  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

This primary objective of this paper is to investigate new ways to tackle the old problem of organisation failure of information systems (IS) development. IS failure is defined as a gap between what the users expect from an information system and how well these expectations are met by the perceived performance of the delivered system. Problems leading to this expectation-perception gap are identified and modelled as five interrelated discrepancies or gaps throughout the process of IS development. The antecedents pertaining to each gap and corrective measures to close the gaps are also suggested. Success in IS development could be achieved by closing the five interrelated gaps and thus closing the expectation-perception gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jayaratna N. Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies, NIMSAD — a systemic framework. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stamper RK. Information in business and administrative systems. Batsford, London, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lyytinen K. Expectation failure concept and systems analysts’ view of information system failures: results of an exploratory study. Information & Management 1988; 14: 45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shand RM. User manuals as project management tools: part I — theoretical background. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 1994; 37(2): 75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, Berry LL. Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perception and Expectation. The Free Press, NY, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pitt LF, Watson RT, Kavan CB. Service Quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly 1995; 19(2): 173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleland DI, King WR. Systems Analysis and Project Management. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boehm BW. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Orlikowski WJ. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organisation. Orghanization Science 1992; 3(3): 398–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drucker P. Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. Harper & Row, NY, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  11. Checkland PB. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walsham G. Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winter MC, Brown DH, Checkland PB. A role for Soft Systems Methodology in information systems development. European Journal of Information Systems 1995; 1(4): 130–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyytinen K, Hirschheim R. Information systems failures — A survey and classification of the empirical literature. Oxford Survey of Information Technology 1987; 4: 257–309

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alter S, Ginzberg MJ. Managing uncertainty in MIS implementation. Sloan Management Review 1978; 19: 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks FP. The Mythical Man-Month. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lucas HC. Implementation: the key to successful information systems, Columbia University Press, NY, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walsham G, Symons V, Waema T. Information systms as social systems: implications for developing countries. Information Technology for Development 1988; 3(3): 189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kettinger WJ, Lee CC. Exploring a‘gap’ model of information services quality. Information Resources Management Journal 1995; 8: 5–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lai, L.S.L. (1999). An Expectation-Perception Gap Analysis of Information Systems Failure. In: Wood-Harper, T., Jayaratna, N., Wood, B. (eds) Methodologies for Developing and Managing Emerging Technology Based Information Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3629-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3629-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-079-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3629-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics