Skip to main content

Using SSM and Software Prototyping: an Emergent Methodology for an Ethical Information System

  • Conference paper
Methodologies for Developing and Managing Emerging Technology Based Information Systems
  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

We examine one particular example of multi-paradigm methodology — the combination of Soft Systems Methodology and software prototyping — to identify its strengths and weaknesses when used in the analysis of an ‘ethically sensitive’ information system. A range of theories and concepts is used to explore the emergent methodology, and the issues of boundary setting and participation are addressed in the context of this case study. The methodology is found generally effective but the ethical issues are seen to be privileged at the expense of the organisational analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Checkland P, Scholes J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, UK, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jayaratna N. Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD A Systemic Framework, McGraw Hill, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis R. Detention Management Unit information system (DMUIS) Project Proposal, Unpublished Document, Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Salford, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis R. Detention Management Unit information system (DMUIS) Interim Report, Unpublished Document, Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Salford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis R. Detention Management Unit information system (DMUIS) Final Report, Unpublished Document, Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Salford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Midgley G. The Sacred and Profane in Critical Systems Thinking. Systems Practice 1992; 5(1): 5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitroff I, Linstone HA. The Unbounded Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodland M with Slater C. SSADM Version 4: A Practical Approach, McGraw Hill, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miles RK. Combining ‘Soft’ and ’Hard’ Systems Practice: Grafting or Embedding. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 1988; 15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miles RK. Combining ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ Systems Practice: Grafting and Embedding Revisited. Systemist; 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis R. Private email communication with F. Bell, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bell F, Oates BJ. A Framework for Method Integration. In: Jayaratna N., Lissoni C. (eds) 2nd BCS Conference on IS Methodologies. September 1994, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flood R, Jackson M. Creative Problem-Solving, Wiley, London, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mingers J. Multi-paradigm methodology. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology. John Wiley, UK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wood-Harper T, Corder S, Wood JRG, Watson H. How We Profess: The Ethical Systems Analyst. Communications of the ACM 1996; 39(3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrage M. Cultures of Prototyping. In: Winograd T. (ed,). Bringing Design to Software, Addison Wesley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Langford D. Practical Computer Ethics. McGraw- Hill, UK, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bommer M, Gratto G, Gravander J, Tuttle M. A Behavioural Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 1987; 6, Kluwer Academic Publishers, US

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mason R. Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly, March 1986, Vol. 10, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mason R. Applying Ethics to Information Technology Issues. Communications of the ACM 1995; 38(12).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mumford E. Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change, Macmillan, 1996, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Waisham G. Ethical Issues in Information Systems Development: The Analyst as Moral Agent. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Conference at Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Checkland P, Holwell S. Information, Systems and Information Systems: making sense of the field, pp 118–124, John Wiley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzgerald B. Formalized systems development methodologies: a critical perspective. Information Systems Journal 1996; 6, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fitzgerald B. The use of systems methodologies in practice: a fiield study, Information Systems Journal; 1997; 7, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bell, F., Davis, R.C. (1999). Using SSM and Software Prototyping: an Emergent Methodology for an Ethical Information System. In: Wood-Harper, T., Jayaratna, N., Wood, B. (eds) Methodologies for Developing and Managing Emerging Technology Based Information Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3629-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3629-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-079-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3629-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics