Skip to main content

Analysing Requirements to Inform Design

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XIII

Abstract

Publications, guidelines and methodologies have proliferated on usability engineering in the HCI literature while an extensive literature exists on methods in requirements engineering. Requirements analysis and usability are inextricably linked yet few methods exist to integrate the two approaches. In this paper we propose a framework for analysing requirements of systems and user interfaces, and report its use in requirements capture. Inadequacies resulting from the application of the framework are described leading to development of a method for requirements elaboration. Use of the method is illustrated by applying it retrospectively to the requirements capture exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bevan, N. (1996), INUSE European Usability Support Centres. Telematics Applications Project IE 2016. Information Engineering Usability Support Centres, Technical Report, National Physical Laboratory. Kirakowski, J. (ed), Human Factors Research Group, University College, Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (1988), “The Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement”, IEEE Computer 21 (5), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. (1992), “Getting Around the Task-Artefact Framework: How to Make Claims and Design by Scenario”, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 10 (2), 181–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. (1997), Crash,Charles Scribners and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, D. & Hartson, H. R. (1993), Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability through Product and Process,John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1992), Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering,McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993), Usability Engineering,Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharpe, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. & Carey, T. (1994), Human-Computer Interaction,Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravden, S. & Johnson, G. (1989), Evaluating Usability of Human-Computer Interfaces: A Practical Method,Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. (1997), “Requirements Made to Measure”, Presentation at City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1992), Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction,second edition, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. (1995), Requirements Rationales: Integrating Approaches to Requirements Analysis, in G. Olson & S. Schuon (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques (DIS’95), ACM Press, pp. 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. (1996), “A Conceptual Framework for Requirements Engineering”, Requirements Engineering Journal 1, 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. (1997), A Technique Combination Approach to Requirements Engineering, in J. Mylopoulos (ed.), Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering RE’97, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. & Maiden, N. A. M. (1998), `The Domain Theory for Requirements Engineering“, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24 (3), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G., Economou, A. & Markis, P. (in press), “Tracing Requirements Errors to Problems in the Requirements Engineering Process”, Requirements Engineering Journal Centre for HCI Design Report HCID/97/24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C., Reiman, J., Lewis, C. & Polson, P. (1994), The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner’s Guide, in J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 105–140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ryan, M., Sutcliffe, A. (1998). Analysing Requirements to Inform Design. In: Johnson, H., Nigay, L., Roast, C. (eds) People and Computers XIII. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76261-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3605-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics