Urodynamics pp 148-172 | Cite as

Urodynamics in Clinical Practice

  • Paul Abrams


The principles of urodynamics having been discussed and the reader provided with a proper understanding of urodynamic techniques, it is important to place urodynamic studies in a proper clinical context. The purpose of this chapter is to show how urodynamic tests can help the clinician to improve diagnosis and treatment. There are four main ways in which this is possible:
  • The investigations may assist in the evaluation of an individual case, providing objective evidence on which to base decisions.

  • The analysis of groups of patients may, over a time, improve both the understanding of pathophysiology and the selection of patients for treatment.

  • Urodynamics may provide objective information before and after therapeutic intervention, allowing the clinician to monitor the results of treatment more accurately.

  • The tests assist the continuing education of clinicians themselves.


Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Stress Incontinence Urge Incontinence Bladder Outlet Obstruction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams P (1978) Urodynamic changes following prostatectomy. Urol Int 33: 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams P (1994). New words for old. Lower urinary tract symptoms for `prostatism’. Br Med J 308: 929–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen T (1977). The non-neurogenic bladder. J Urol 177: 232–238.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen JT, Bradley WE (1976). Abnormalities of detrusor and sphincter function in multiple sclerosis. Br J Urol 48: 193–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen JT (1988). Urodynamics terminology and normal values in children, females and males. Scand J Urol Nephrol suppl 114.Google Scholar
  6. Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1986). Urodynamic appraisal of vaginal pressure versus rectal pressure recording as indication of intraabdominal pressure changes. Urology 27: 482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaivas J, Labib KL, Bauer SB, Retik AB (1977). Changing concepts in urodynamic evaluation of children. J Urol 117: 778–781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne DJ, Hamilton Stewart PA, Gray BK (1987). The role of urodynamics in female urinary stress incontinence. Br J Urol 59: 228–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chancellor MB (1993). Urodynamic evaluation after spinal cord injury. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America 4: 273–298.Google Scholar
  10. Gierup J (1970). Micturition studies in infants and children. Scand J Nephrol 5: 12 suppl.Google Scholar
  11. Griffiths DJ, Scholtmeijer RJ (1982). Precise urodynamic assessment of meatal and distal urethral stenosis in girls. Neurourol Urodyn 1: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houle A, Gilmour R, Churchill B et al. (1993). What volume can a child normally store in the bladder at a safe pressure. J Urol 149: 561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Koff S (1982). Estimating bladder capacity in children. Urology 21: 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lim CS, Abrams P (1995). The Abrams-Griffiths Nomogram. World J Urol 13: 34–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayo ME, Chetner MP (1992). Lower urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Urology 39: 67–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McGuire EJ (1994). Idiopathic detrusor instability. In Kursh ED, McGuire EJ (eds): female urology. Philadelphia: Lipincott p 95.Google Scholar
  17. Nijman R (1994). Course on paediatric urodynamics. Utrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Philp T, Read DJ, Higson RH (1981). The urodynamic characteristics of multiple sclerosis. Br J Urol 53: 672–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Price DA, Ramsden PD, Stobbart D (1980) The unstable bladder and prostatectomy. Br J Urol 52: 529–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Poulsen A, Schou J, Puggaard L, Torp-Pedersen S, Nordling J (1994). Prostatic enlargement symptomatology and pressure/flow evaluation: interrelations in patients with symptomatic BPH. Scand J Urol Nephrol suppl 157: 67–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shepherd AM, Powell PH, Ball AJ (1982). The place of urodynamic studies in the investigation and treatment of female urinary tract symptoms. J Obstet Gynaecol 3: 123–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Abrams
    • 1
  1. 1.Bristol Urological InstituteSouthmead HospitalWestbury-on-Trym, BristolUK

Personalised recommendations