Skip to main content

Urodynamic Techniques

  • Chapter
Urodynamics

Abstract

The evolution of urodynamic units may be traced to the interest in the hydrodynamics of micturition which had been simmering since the early cystometric studies of the nineteenth century, but it was the advent of electronics that acted as the catalyst for modern urodynamic studies. In 1956 von Garrelts described a simple practical apparatus, using a pressure transducer, to record the volume of urine voided as a function of time and thus, by derivation, urine flow rates could be calculated. His work stimulated a revival of interest in cystometry, because it was then possible to record the bladder pressure and the urine flow rate simultaneously during voiding. As a result, normal and obstructed micturition could be defined in terms of these measurements (Claridge 1966) and a formula was applied to express urethral resistance (Smith 1968). Enhorning (1961) measured bladder and urethral pressures simultaneously with a specially designed catheter and he termed the pressure difference between them the urethral closure pressure. He demonstrated that a reduction of intraurethral pressure occurred several seconds prior to detrusor contraction at the initiation of voiding. This appeared to be related to the relaxation of the pelvic floor, thus confirming the EMG studies of Franksson and Peterson (1955).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander S, Rowan D (1968). An electric pessary for stress incontinence. Lancet 1: 728.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates CP, Whiteside CG, Turner Warwick R (1970). Synchronous urine pressure flow cystourethrography with special reference to stress and urge incontinence. Br J Urol 42: 714–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell KPS (1967). The treatment of incontinence by electronic implants. Ann R Coll Surg 41: 447–459.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claridge M (1966). Analyses of obstructed micturition. Ann R Coll Surg 39: 30–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enhorning G (1961). Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intra-urethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 276: 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franksson C, Petersen I (1955). Electromyographic investigation of disturbances in the striated muscle of the urethral sphincter. Br J Urol 27: 154–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson BR, Lightwood R (1967). Electrical treatment of incontinence. Br J Surg 54:802–805. Moore T, Schofield PF (1997). Treatment of stress incontinence by maximum perineal electrical stimulation. Br Med J iii: 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JC (1968). Urethral resistance to micturition. Br J Urol 40: 125–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DG, Smallwood R, Graham D (1975). Urodynamic observations following spinal trauma. Br J Urol 47: 161–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner Warwick R, Whiteside CG (1970). Investigation and management of bladder neck dysfunction. In: Riches Sir Eric (ed) Modern trends in urology 3. London: Butterworth pp 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

Urethral Function Studies

  • Abrams P, Torrens MJ (1977). Urethral closure pressure profiles in the male. Urol Int 32: 137–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen M, Ulmsten U (1976). Simultaneous urethrocystometry with a new technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10: 7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Wickham JEA (1969). The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 41: 211–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK (1995). The continence program for women research group. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 173 /2: 551–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards LE (1973). Investigation and management of incontinence in women. Ann Roy Coll Surg 52: 69–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton P (1983). The urethral pressure profile under stress: a comparison of profiles on coughing and straining. Neurourol Urodyn 2: 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulseng-Hanssen S, Stien R, Fonstelien E (1987). Urethral pressure variations in women with neurological symptoms. In relationship to urethral and pelvic floor striated muscle. Neurourol Urodyn 6: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulseng-Hanssen S (1983). Prevalence and pattern of unstable urethral pressure in 174 gynaecologic patients referred for urodynamic investigation. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 146: 895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lose G (1992). Simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra: a study of urethral closure function in healthy and stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 11: 55–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J et al. (1993). Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 150: 1452–1454.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanagho EA (1979). Urodynamics of female urinary incontinence with emphasis on stress incontinence. J Urol 122: 200–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thind P, Lose G, Jorgensen L et al. (1991). Urethral pressure increment preceding and following bladder pressure elevation during stress episodes in healthy and stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 10: 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Iosif S (1982). The unstable female urethra. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 144: 93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yalla SV, Sharma GVRK, Barsamian EM (1980). Micturitional static urethral pressure profile. A method of recording urethral pressure profile during voiding and the implications. J Urol 124: 649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams P (1991). The Urine flow clinic. In Fitzpatrick JN (ed) Conservative treatment of BPH Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone pp 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams P (1977). Prostatism and prostatectomy: The value of urine flow rate measurement in the preoperative assessment for operation. J Urol 117: 70–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Backman KA (1965). Urinary flow during micturition in normal women. Acta Chir Scand 130: 357–370.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Backman KA, von Garrelts B, Sundblad R (1966). Micturition in normal women. Studies of pressure and flow. Acta Chir Scand 132: 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor MB, Blaivas JG, Kaplan SA, Axelrod S (1991). Bladder outlet obstruction versus impaired detrusor contractility: the role of uroflow. J Urol 145: 810–812.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drach GW, Steinbronn DV (1986). Clinical evaluation of patients with prostatic obstruction; correlation of flow rates with voided, residual or total bladder volume. J Urol 135: 737–740.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrelts B von (1956). Analysis of micturition. A new method of recording the voiding of the bladder. Acta Chir Scand 112: 326–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrelts B von (1958). Micturition in the normal male. Acta Chir Scand 114: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierup T (1970) Micturition studies in infants and children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 4: 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason DM, Bottaccini MR, Perling D, Lattimer JK (1967). A challenge to current urodynamic thought. J Urol 97: 935.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golomb J, Linder A, Siegel Y, Korezah D (1992). Variability and circadian changes in home uroflowmetry in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia compared to normal controls. J Urol 147: 1044–1047.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths CJ, Murray A, Ramsden PD (1983). A simple uroflowmeter tester. Br J Urol 55: 21–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DJ, Scholtmeijer RJ (1984). Place of the free flow curve in the urodynamic investigation of children. Br J Urol 56: 474–477.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grino PB, Bruskewitz R, Blaivas JG, Siroky MB, Andersen JT, Cook T, Stower E (1993). Maximum urinary flow rate by uroflowmetry: Automatic or visual interpretation. J Urol 149: 339–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haylen BT, Parys BT, Anyaegbunam WI, Ashby D, West CR (1990). Urine flow rates in male and female urodynamic patients compared with Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 65: 483–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen KM-E, Jorgensen JB, Mogensen P (1985). Reproducibility of uroflowmetry variable in elderly males. Urol Res. 13: 237–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen JB, Jensen KM-E, Bille-Brahe NE, Morgensen P (1986). Uroflowmetry in asymptomatic elderly males. Br J Urol 58: 390–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen JB, Jensen KM-E, Morgensen P (1993). Longitudinal observations on normal and abnormal voiding in men over the age of 50 years. Uroflowmetry and symptoms of prostatism. Br J Urol 72: 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadow C, Howells S, Lewis P, Abrams P (1985). A flow rate nomogram for normal males over the age of 50. Proc. ICS 15th Annual meeting, London 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollema HJ (1981). Uroflowmetry in males. Reference values and clinical application in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Rijksuniveriteit te Groningen, Druk-kerij van Denderen BV, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryall RR, Marshall VR (1982). Normal peak urinary flow rates obtained from small voided volumes can provide a reliable assessment of bladder function. J Urol 127: 484–488.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siroky MB, Olsson CA, Krane RJ (1979). The flow rate nomogram. 1. Development. J Uro1122: 665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo L, Fegyverneki S (1995). Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal children–the miskolc nomograms. Br J Urol 76: 16–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams P, Breskewitz R, de la Rossette J, Griffiths D, Koyanagi T, Nordling J, Park YC, Schafer W, Zimmern P (1995). The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction: Urodynamics. The 3rd International Consultation on BPH p 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams P, Griffiths DJ (1979). The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine. Br J Urol 51: 129–134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon A, Tamnela T, Barrett D, Abrams P, Schafer W, Malice MP and the UDS study group (1996). Repeat pressure flow studies (pQS) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction ( BPO ). Neurourol Urodyn 15: 387–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolsaet BL (1985). Bladder compliance and detrusor activity during collection phase. Neurourol Urodyn 4: 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coolsaet BL, Van Duyl WA, Van Mastright R, van der Zwart (1973). Stepwise cystometry of the urinary bladder. Urology II: 255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DJ (1973). The mechanics of the urethra and micturition. Br J Urol 45: 497–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DJ, Van Mastrigt R, Bosch R (1989). Quantification of urethral resistance and bladder function during voiding, with special reference to the effects of prostate size reduction on urethral obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Neurourol Urodyn 8: 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom PA, Tammela TLJ (1993). The bladder cooling test. Int Urogynaecol J 4: 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom PA, Tammela TLJ, Kontturi MJ et al. (1991). The bladder cooling test for urodynamic assessment: Analysis of 400 examinations. Br J Urol 67: 275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hofner K, Kramer AEJL, Tan HK, Krah H, Jonas U (1995). CHESS classification of bladder outflow obstruction. A consequence in the discussion of current concepts. World J Urol 13: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • James ED, Niblett PG, MacNaughton JA, Sheldon C (1987). The vagina as an alternative to the rectum in measuring abdominal pressure during urodynamic investigations. Br J Urol 60: 212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klevmark B (1974). Motility of the urinary bladder in cats during filling at physiological rates. 1. Intravesical pressure patterns studied by a new method of cystometry. Acta Physiol Scand 90: 565–577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim CS, Abrams P (1995). The Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. World J Urol 13: 34–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill DC (1971). The air cystometer, a new instrument for evaluating bladder function. J Urol 106: 865–866.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard J, Lim CS, Abrams P (1995). Pressure flow studies in men: the obstructive effect of a urethral catheter. J Urol in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryall RL, Marshall VR (1982). The effect of a urethral catheter on the measurement of maximum urinary flow rate. J Urol 128: 429–432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer W (1990). Basic principles and clinical application of advanced analysis of bladder voiding function. Urol Clin N Am 17: 553–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethia KK, Smith JC (1987). The effect of ph and lignocaine on detrusor instability. Br J Urol 60: 516.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen S, Jonler M, Knudson UB, Djurhuus JC (1989). The influence of a urethral catheter and age on recorded urinary flow rates in healthy women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 23: 261–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spangberg A, Terio H, Engberg A, Ask P (1989). Quantification of urethral function based on Griffiths’ model of flow through elastic tubes. Neurourol Urodyn 8: 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DG (1979). Clinical urodynamics in neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Urol Clin N Am 6: 237–253.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens MJ (1977). A comparative evaluation of carbon dioxide and water cystometry and sphincterometry. Proc Int Cont Soc Portoroz 7: 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wein AJ, Hanno PM, Dixon DO, Raezer D, Benson GS (1978). The reproducibility and interpretation of carbon dioxide cystometry. J Urol 120: 205–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Videourodynamics

  • Enhorning G, Miller ER, Hinman F (1964). Urethral closure studied with cineroentgenography and simultaneous bladder-urethra pressure recording. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 118: 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norlen LJ, Blaivas JG (1986). Unsuspected proximal urethral obstruction in young and middle aged men. J Urol 135: 972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkash I, Friendland GW (1985). Real-time gray-scale transrectal linear array ultrasonography in urodynamic evaluation. Semin Urol 3: 49–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Versi E, Cardozo L, Studd JWW, Brincat M, O’Dowd TM, Cooper DJ (1986). Internal urinary sphincter in maintenance of female continence. Br Med J 292: 166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster GD, Older RA (1980). Video urodynamics. Urology 16: 106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ambulatory Urodynamics

  • Griffiths CJ, Assi MS, Styles RA, Neal DE (1987). Ambulatory long-term monitoring of bladder and detrusor pressure. Neurourol Urodyn 6: 161–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • James D. Continuous monitoring. (1979) Urol clin N Am 6: 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulseng-Hanssen S, Klevmark B (1988). Ambulatory urethro-cysto-rectometry. A new technique. Neurourol Urodyn 7: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulseng-Hanssen S, Klevmark B (1996). Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring of women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 30 suppl 179 pp 27–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paseini-Glazel G. Cisternino A, Artibani W, Pagano F (1992). Ambulatory urodynamics. Preliminary experience with vesico urethral holter in children. Scand J Urol Nephrol suppl 141: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AS, Griffiths C, Neal DE (1996). Conventional urodynamics and ambulatory monitoring in the definition and management of bladder outflow obstruction J Urol 155: 506–511.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Waalwijk van Doom ESC, Remmers A, Janknegt RA (1992). Conventional and extramural ambulatory urodyamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers. J Urol 147: 1319–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb RJ, Ramsden PD, Neal DE (1991). Ambulatory monitoring and electronic measurement of urinary leakage in the diagnosis of detrusor instability and incontinence. Br J Urol 146: 336–337.

    Google Scholar 

Pad Testing

  • Jorgensen L, Lose F, Andersen JT (1987). One hour pad-weighing test for objective assessment of female urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynaecol 69: 39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling JA (1979) The structure of the bladder and the urethra in relation to function. Urol Clin N Am 6: 31–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lose G, Versi E (1992). Pad-weighing tests in the diagnosis and quantification of incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 3: 324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Versi E, Orrego G, Hardy E, Seddon G, Smith P, Anand D (1996). Evaluation of the home pad test in the investigation of female urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 162–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Neurophysiological Testing

  • Fowler CJ, Christmas TJ, Chapple CR, Parkhouse HF, Kirby RS, Jacobs HS (1988). Abnormal electromyographic activity of the urethral sphincter, voiding dysfunction, and polycystic ovaries: A new syndrome? Br Med J 297: 1436–1438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siroky MB (1996). Electromyography of the perineal floor. Urol Clin N Am I 23:299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vodusek DB (1996). Evoked potential testing. Urol Clin N Am II 23: 427–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrams, P. (1997). Urodynamic Techniques. In: Urodynamics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3598-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3598-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3600-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3598-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics