Abstract
Aspiring practitioners must be taught to specify and to solve discipline problems. We begin by considering the gap between HCI research and system development, but particularly as it relates to teaching. The gap manifests itself through the dissatisfaction many system developers express with the adequacy of HCI teaching. We next suggest that one reason for the gap lies in the current tendency to teach HCI as a multidisciplinary applied science subject. This tendency results in incomplete and incoherent coverage, not well-suited to the needs of system development. We suggest that a top-down approach to the subject and stronger design orientation should ameliorate some of the weaknesses. We utilize a conception of HCI as a framework for specifying more effective HCI courses. We report the development of a course in the Human Factors of HCI which has exploited the conception, and we informally evaluate the conception as a partial solution to current inadequacies in HCI teaching.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ACM (1991), “ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human Computer Interaction”. Report of the Association of Computing Machinery.
Alpar, S. A. (1986), “Human Interface Aspects of Man—Machine Interaction in Higher Education”. The Alvey Directorate.
Booth, P. (1989), An Introduction to Human—Computer Interaction,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Card. S. K. (1993), Presentation at INTERCHI’93 Workshop on HCI Teaching.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. & Beale, R. (1993), Human—Computer Interaction,Prentice—Hall International.
Dowell, J. & Long, J. (1989), “Towards a Conception for an Engineering Discipline of Human Factors”, Ergonomics 32 (11), 1513–1535.
Gaines, B. R. & Shaw, M. L. G. (1986), “Foundations of Dialog Engineering: The Development of Human—Computer Interaction, Part II”. International Journal of Man—Machine Studies 24 (2), 101–123.
Johnson, P. (1992), Human—Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering,McGraw-Hill.
Life, M. A., Kirby, M., Istance, H., Hole, L., Crombie, A., Scown, P. & McManus, B. (1995), “HCI Teaching in our Universities: Getting it on the Computer Science Map”, Interfaces 28, 3–8.
Long, J. (1987), Cognitive Ergonomics and Human—Computer Interaction, in P. Warr (ed.), “Psychology at Work”, Harmondsworth (Penguin), pp. 73–95.
Long, J. & Dowell, J. (1989), Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering, in A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (eds.), “People and Computers V (Proceedings of HCI’89)”, Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–34.
Löwgren, J. & Holmberg, L. (1993), “Customizing the SIGCHI Curriculum for use in Sweden”, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25 (4), 8–11.
May, A. J. (1993), Development of Generic User Requirements for Interactive Public Information Systems, Master’s thesis, Ergonomics and HCI Unit, University of London.
Middlemass, J. R. (1993), Towards a Method to Guide the Production of Specifications to Support User Interface Prototyping Tool Selection, Master’s thesis, Ergonomics and HCI Unit, University of London.
Pollitzer, E. (1994), Presentation to workshop on Cognitive Science and HCI, Osaka, Japan.
Preece, J. (1991), “Human—Computer Interaction: What about Teaching and Training?”, Computer Bulletin 3 (6), 16–17.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. & Carey, T. (1994), Human—Computer Interaction,Addison—Wesley.
Ralph, G. & Life, M. A. (1994), Rolling the DiCE: Towards a Manual Handling Assessment System for Non-specialists, in N. Adams, N. Coleman & M. Stevenson (eds.), “Proceedings of 30th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia”, Ergonomics Society of Australia, pp. 4–12.
Stork, J. A. J. (1992), A Formal Description of Worksystem Behaviours and Interactions, Master’s thesis, Ergonomics and HCI Unit, University of London.
Storrs, G. (1989), “A Conceptual Model of Human—Computer Interaction?”, Behaviour & Information Technology 8 (5), 323–334.
Strong, G. W. (1994), “New Directions in Human—Computer Interaction Education, Research and Practice”. Report of US National Science Foundation (Planning Grant No.IRI-9322–659).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Life, M.A., Long, J. (1996). Developing University Courses to Enable Students to Specify and Solve Human—Computer Interaction Design Problems. In: Sasse, M.A., Cunningham, R.J., Winder, R.L. (eds) People and Computers XI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76069-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3588-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive