The “Perceptual Magnet” Effect: A Model Based on Self-Organizing Feature Maps

  • M. Herrmann
  • H.-U. Bauer
  • R. Der
Conference paper
Part of the Workshops in Computing book series (WORKSHOPS COMP.)


The perceptual magnet effect describes an increased generalization capability for the perception of vowels, if the perceived vowels are prototypical. We here propose an unsupervised, adaptive neural network model which allows to control the relation between stimulus density and generalization capability, and which can account for the perceptual magnet effect. Our model is based on a modification of the self-organizing feature map algorithm, and includes local variations of the adaptability. Numerical and analytical results for the model are given, together with a brief discussion of possible other domains of application for the model.


Input Space Generalization Capability Local Adaptability Stimulus Distribution Phonetic Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    P. K. Kühl, Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet” effect for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics 50 (2), 93–107 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. K. Kuhl, K. A. Williams, F. Lacerda, K. N. Stevens, B. Lindblom, Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255, 606–608 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. J. King, D. R. Moore, Plasticity of auditory maps in the brain. TINS 14, 31–37 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Kohonen, Self-organization and associative memory. Springer (1984).MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Th. Villmann, R. Der, M. Herrmann, Th. Martinetz, Topology preservation in self-organizing feature maps: Exact definition and measurement. Submitted to IEEE Transact. Neural Networks (1994).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Ritter, I. Martinetz, K. Schulten, Neural computation and self-organizing maps. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass (1992).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Obermayer, G.G. Blasdel, K. Schulten, Statistical-mechanical analysis of self-organisation and pattern formation during the development of visual maps, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7568–7589 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H.-U. Bauer, Development of oriented ocular dominance bands as a consequence of areal geometry, Neural Computation, in print (1994).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. Wolf, H.-U. Bauer, T. Geisel, Formation of field discontinuities and islands in visual cortical maps, Biol. Cyb. 70, 525–531 (1994).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T.M. Martinetz, H. Ritter, K. Schulten, Kohonen’s self-organizing map for modeling the formation of the auditory cortex of a bat, SGAICO-Proc. “Connectionism in Perspective”, (Zürich), 403–412 (1988).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Kohonen, Physiological interpretation of the self-organizing map algorithm. Neural Networks 6, 895–905 (1993).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    P.M. Daniel, D. Whitteridge, The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in Monkeys, J. Physiol. 159, 203–221 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Ritter, K. Schulten, On the stationary state of Kohonen’s self-organizing sensory mapping. Biol. Cybern. 54, 99–106 (1986).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Cottrell, J. C. Fort, G. Pages, Two or three things that we know about the Kohonen algorithm. Proc. ESANN’94, Brussels (1994).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Baddeley, personal communication.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. Gupta, Investigating phonological representations: A modeling agenda. In: M. C. Mozer e.a. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1993 Connectionist Models Summer School, Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum (1993).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    D.P. Morgan, C.L. Scofield, Neural Networks and Speech Recognition, Kluwer Academic, Boston, see p. 198 (1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Herrmann
    • 1
  • H.-U. Bauer
    • 2
  • R. Der
    • 3
  1. 1.NORDITACopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Institut für theor. PhysikUniversität FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.Institut für InformatikUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations