Skip to main content

Knowledge and Uncertainty a Rough Set Approach

  • Conference paper
Incompleteness and Uncertainty in Information Systems

Part of the book series: Workshops in Computing ((WORKSHOPS COMP.))

Abstract

The idea of a rough set has been proposed by the author as a new mathematical tool to deal with vagueness and uncertainty. It seems to be of fundamental importance to AI and cognitive sciences, in particular expert systems, decision support systems, machine learning, machine discovery, inductive reasoning pattern recognition, decision tables and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikins JS. Prototypic a knowledge for expert systems. Artificial Intelligence 1983; 20: 163–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Black M. Vagueness. The Philosophy of Sciences 1937; 427–455

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black M. Reasoning with loose concepts. Dialog 1963; 2: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobrow DG. A panel on knowledge representation. Proc Fifth Int’l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1977, Carnegie-Melon University, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobrow DG, Winograd T. An overview of KRL: a knowledge representation language. Journal of Cognitive Sciences 1977; 1: 3–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brachman RJ, Smith BC. Special issue of knowledge representation. SIGART Newsletter 1980; 70: 1–138

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brachman RJ, Levesque HJ. (eds) Readings in knowledge representation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buchanan B, Shortliffe E. Rule based expert systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis R, Lenat D. Knowledge-based systems in artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fine K. Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese 1975; 30: 265–300

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Frege G. Grundgesetze der arithmentik. 1903;2. Geach, Black (eds) In: Selections from the philosophical writings of Gotlob Frege, Blackweil, Oxford, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glazek K. Some old and new problems in the independence theory. Colloquium Mathematicum 1979; 17: 127–189

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Grzymala-Busse J. On the reduction of knowledge representation. Systems Proc of the 6th Intl Workshop on Expert Systems and their Applications, Avignon, France, 1986; pp 463–478

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grzymala-Busse J. Knowledge acquisition under uncertainty–a rough set approach. Journal of Intelligent and Robotics Systems 1988; 1: 3–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Halpern J. (ed) Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge. Proc of the 1986 Conference, Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, CA 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hayes-Roth B, McDermott J. An inference matching for inducing abstraction. Communication of the ACM 1978; 21: 401–410

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hempel CG. Fundamental of concept formation in empirical sciences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hintika J. Knowledge and belief. Cornell University Press, Chicago, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR. Induction: processes of inference, learning, and discovery, MIT Press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunt EB. Concept formation. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marczewski E. A general scheme of independence in mathematics, BAPS 1958; 731–736

    Google Scholar 

  22. McDermott D. The last survey of representation of knowledge. Proc of the AISB/GI Conference on AI, Hamburg, 1978, pp 286–221

    Google Scholar 

  23. Minski M. A framework for representation knowledge. In: Winston P (ed) The psychology of computer vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975, pp 211–277

    Google Scholar 

  24. Newell A. The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence 1982; 18: 87–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Orlowska E. Logic for reasoning about knowledge. Zeitshrift fur Math Logik and Grundlagen der Math 1989; 35: 559–572

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Pawlak Z. Rough sets—theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pawlak Z, Skowron A. From the rough set theory to evidence theory. In: Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Yager RR (eds) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, John Wiley and Sons, 1992 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pawlak Z, Skowron A. Rough membership functions: a tool for reasoning with uncertainty. Algebraic Methods in Logic and Computer Science, Banach Center Publications, Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 1993; 28: 135–150

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rauszer C. Logic for information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 1992 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rauszer C. Knowledge representation for group of agents. In: Wolenski J (ed) Philosophical logic in Poland, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rauszer C. Rough logic for multi agent systems. Proc of the Conference Logic at Work, Amsterdam, 1992 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rauszer C. Approximate methods for knowledge systems. Proc of the 7th Int’l Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Trondheim, 1993, pp 326–337

    Google Scholar 

  34. Russell B. Vagueness. Australian Journal of Philosophy 1923; 1: 84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Russell B. An inquiry into meaning and truth. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1950

    Google Scholar 

  36. Skowron A, Grzymala-Busse J. From the rough set theory to evidence theory. In: Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Yager RR (eds) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, John Wiley and Sons, 1991 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Skowron A, Rauszer C. The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems, In: Slowinski R (ed) Intelligent decision support. Handbook of advances and applications of the rough set theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, pp 311–362

    Google Scholar 

  38. Slowinski R (ed) Intelligent decision support. In: Handbook of advances and applications of the rough set theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ziarko W. On reduction of knowledge representation. Proc 2nd Intl Symp on Methodologies of Intelligent Systems, Charlotte, NC, 1987, pp 99–113

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ziarko W. Acquisition of design knowledge from examples, Math Comput Modeling 1988; 10: 551–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 British Computer Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pawlak, Z. (1994). Knowledge and Uncertainty a Rough Set Approach. In: Alagar, V.S., Bergler, S., Dong, F.Q. (eds) Incompleteness and Uncertainty in Information Systems. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3242-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3242-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19897-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3242-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics