Skip to main content

A General Technique for Automatically Generating Efficient Programs Through the Use of Proof Planning (Abstract)

  • Conference paper
Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation

Part of the book series: Workshops in Computing ((WORKSHOPS COMP.))

  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

A general framework for synthesizing efficient programs, using tools such as higher-order unification (henceforth HOU), has been developed and holds promise for encapsulating an otherwise diverse, and often ad hoc, range of transformation techniques. A prototype system has been implemented. Proof plans — formal outlines of constructive proofs — are used to control the (automatic) synthesis of the efficient programs from standard definitional equations [1,6,5]. Programs are specified in the standard equational form within the logic of the OYSTER proof refinement system. The construction of the improved functions is automatically controlled using the CLAM proof planner [2].

This research was supported by SERC grant GR/H/23610 and a SERC Postdoctoral Fellowship to the first author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Bundy, A. Stevens, F. van Harmelen, A. Ireland, and A. Smaill. Rippling: A heuristic for guiding inductive proofs. Research Paper 567, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, 1991. In the Journal of Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, C. Horn, and A. Smaill. The Oyster-Clam system. Research Paper 507, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, 1990. Appeared in the proceedings of CADE-10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.B. Curry and R. Feys. Combinatory Logic. North-Holland, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.A. Howard. The formulae-as-types notion of construction. In J.P. Seldin and J.R. Hindley, editors, To H.B. Curry; Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalism, pages 479–490. Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Madden, I. Green, and A. Bundy. A General Technique for Optimizing Programs by using Proof Plans. Technical Report in preperation, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Madden, J. Hesketh, I. Green, and A. Bundy. A general technique for automatically optimizing programs through the use of proof plans. Research Paper 608, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 British Computer Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Madden, P., Hesketh, J., Green, I., Bundy, A. (1994). A General Technique for Automatically Generating Efficient Programs Through the Use of Proof Planning (Abstract). In: Deville, Y. (eds) Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3234-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3234-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19864-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3234-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics