Skip to main content

A ‘Select and Generate’ Approach to Automatic Abstracting

  • Conference paper
Book cover 14th Information Retrieval Colloquium

Part of the book series: Workshops in Computing ((WORKSHOPS COMP.))

Abstract

This paper describes on-going work on a new method of automatic abstracting which uses general domain knowledge in association with extracting techniques. A representation of the main concepts of a paper are stored in an abstract-frame. Each section of the abstract-frame has a group of phrases associated with it, and the occurrence of these phrases are used to extract relevant portions of text from source documents. The completed abstract-frame is then run through a program which uses an abstract template to produce a coherent, cohesive abstract.

The system is being developed with papers in the area of agriculture, specifically papers dealing with experiments, trials or observations on crops. One aim of the project however is to produce a system which may be easily transferred to other domain areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baxendale, P. B. Man-made Index for Technical Literature - An Experimentl.B.M. Journal of Research and Development. 2(4): 354–361, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dejong, G. “An Overview of the FRUMP System.In Strategies for Natural Language Processing,”Lehnert and Ringle (eds.) 1982. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edmundson, H. P. New Methods in Automatic Extracting. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery.16(2): 264–285, 1969.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, M. and A. V. Pollock. Trials on trial: a review of trials of antibiotic prophylaxis.Archives of Surgery.119: 109–113, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kent, A.Textbook on Mechanized Information Retrieval. second edition, New York: 1966. Wiley Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kircz, J. G. Rhetorical Structure of Scientific Articles: The Case for Argumentational Analysis in Information Retrieval.Journal of Documentation.47(4): 354–372, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liddy, E. D. The Discourse Level Structure of Empirical Abstracts: An Exploratory Study.Information Processing and Management.27(1): 55–81, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luhn, H. P. The automatic creation of literature abstracts.I.B.M. Journal of Research and Development.2(2): 159–165, 1958.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathis, B. A., I. E. Rush and C. E. Young. Improvement of automatic abstracts by the use of structural analysis.Journal of the American Society for Information Science.24(2): 101–109, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Narine, L., S. Y. Deanna. T. R. Einarson and A. L. Ilersich. Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989.Canadian Medical Association Journal.=.144(4): 449–453, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paice, C. D. “The Automatic Generation of Literature Abstracts: an approach based onself indicating phrases.”In Information Retrieval Research.Oddy, Robertson,Rijsbergen and Williams (eds.) 1981. London: Butterworths. 172–191.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paice, C. D. Constructing Literature Abstracts by Computer: Techniques and Prospects.Information Processing and Management.26(1): 171–186,1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paice, C. D. The Rhetorical Structure of Expository Texts.In The Structuring of Information.K. Jones (ed.), Proceedings of Informatics 11. London: ASLIB 1991. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paice, C. D. and O. D. Husk. Towards the automatic recognition of anaphoric features in English text: the impersonal pronoun it.Computer Speech and Language.2: 109–132. 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Propp. V.Morphology of the folk-tale., 1958. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rama, D. V. and P. Srinivasan. An investigation of content representation using text grammars.ACM Transactions on Informotion Systems. in press: 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rush, I. E . R. Salvador and A. Zamora. Automatic Abstracting and Indexing. II. Production of indicative abstracts by application of contextual inference and syntactic coherence criteria.Journal of the American Society for Information Science.22(3): 260–274, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Dijk. T. A.Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse. interaction. and cognition.1980. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 British Computer Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jones, P.A., Paice, C.D. (1993). A ‘Select and Generate’ Approach to Automatic Abstracting. In: McEnery, T., Paice, C. (eds) 14th Information Retrieval Colloquium. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3211-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3211-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19808-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3211-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics