Advertisement

The Logical Structure of WH-Clauses

  • A. Ramsey
Conference paper
Part of the Workshops in Computing book series (WORKSHOPS COMP.)

Abstract

We propose an analysis of the semantics of WH-clauses. Under the proposed treatment, the same analysis of WH-clauses explains how they can function as questions, as restrictive or attributive relative clauses, or as NPs. We thus avoid the need for different rules to account for the interpretation of such clauses in different circumstances. This is important both computationally, since it cuts down the size of the grammar and hence the time spent in syntactic analysis, and conceptually, since it shows the connection between the various uses of such clauses.

Keywords

Relative Clause Property Theory Nominal Group Grammatical Rule Transitive Verb 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelt D. (1985): Planning English Sentences: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gazdar G., Klein E., Pullum G. & Sag I. (1985): Generalised Phrase Structure Grammar: Basil Blackwell, Oxford. 9Google Scholar
  3. Jackendoff, R.S. (1977): X-bar Syntax: a Study of Phrase Structure: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Kamp, H. (1984): A theory of Truth and Semantic Representation, in Formal methods in the study of language (eds. J. Groenendijk, J. Janssen Si M. Stokhof ): Foris Publications, Dordrecht, 277–322.Google Scholar
  5. Pollard C. & Sag I.A. (1988): An Information Based Approach. to Syntax and Semantics: Vol 1 Fundamentals: CSLI lecture notes 13, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Ramsay A.M. (1989): Epistemic Reasoning without Possible Worlds, Prima Congresso della Associazione Italiana ped l’Intelligenza Artificiale, Trento.Google Scholar
  7. Schank R.C. (1972): Conceptual Dependency: a Theory of Natural Language Understanding, Cognitive Psychology 3 (4), 552–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Turner R. (1987): A Theory of Properties, Journal of Symbolic Logic 52(2), 455–472.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Computer Society 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ramsey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College DublinBelfield, Dublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations