Abstract
Antenatal HIV screening has roused much controversy in the medical press. Discussion has centred round whether screening should be offered to all pregnant women or only to those in high risk groups, whether samples sent to the laboratories should be anonymous or identifiable and, most importantly, whether prior consent from the mother is required. It is easy to understand the basis for this controversy because, although antenatal HIV screening has advantages it also creates several problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Doll R. A proposal for doing prevalence studies of AIDS. Br Med J 1987; 294: 244.
Bodmer W, Cox D, Doll R, Durbin. J, Hoffenberg R, Kingman J, Pefo J, Weiss R, Black D. HIV testing on all pregnant women (Letter). Lancet 1987, 2: 1277.
Gillon R. Testing for HIV without permission. Br Med J 1987; 294: 821–823.
Declaration of Helsinki. In: The Handbook of Medical Ethics. London: British Medical Association, 1984; pp.73–76.
AIDS and the Newborn. Report on a WHO Consultation. Copenhagen, 9–10th April, 1987.
Beecham J. Support for BMA council’s decision on AIDS. (Editorial report). Br Med J 1987; 295: 1428–1429.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howie, P.W. (1988). Antenatal HIV screening—ethical considerations. In: Sharp, F., Hudson, C.N. (eds) AIDS and Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3150-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3150-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3152-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3150-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive