Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Clinical Practice in Urology ((PRACTICE UROLOG))

Abstract

A plethora of surgical techniques has been designed for the treatment of stress incontinence. Uro-gynaecologists favour operations that seek to reposition the bladder neck and proximal urethra within the abdominal cavity. The theoretical basis of repositioning operations is the intraabdominal position of the proximal urethra. The intra-abdominal proximal urethra acts as a “flutter valve”. Although there are large alterations in intravesical pressure during straining and coughing (pressures rising up to 200–300 cmH20) we are protected from leakage. The increased intravesical pressure will try to force open the bladder neck. In a flutter valve mechanism an equal and opposite pressure attempts to maintain lateral compression on the urethra, negating the intravesical force attempting to open it. Stress urethral pressure profilometry shows how these increases in intravesical pressure are matched by equal transmission of intra-abdominal pressure to the proximal urethra (Fig. 14.1, “Post-op” trace). It has been disputed whether the intra-abdominal position of the proximal urethra is the only mechanism preventing stress incontinence. Several workers have suggested that there is also a pelvic floor reflex contraction that is important in maintaining continence (Heidler et al. 1979).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Chilton CP, Turner-Warwick R (1981) The relationship of the distal urethral sphincter to the pelvic floor musculature. Communication to the annual meeting of the British Association of Urological Surgeons, London, July 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidler H, Wölk H, Jonas U (1979) Urethral closure mechanism under stress conditions. Eur Urol 5: 110–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy AR (1983) A trial comparing the Stamey bladder neck suspension with colposuspension for the treatment of stress incontinence. Br J Urol 55: 687–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamey TA (1973) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136: 547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrams, P., Yande, S.D. (1988). Stamey Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension. In: Gingell, J.C., Abrams, P.H. (eds) Controversies and Innovations in Urological Surgery. Clinical Practice in Urology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3142-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3142-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3144-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3142-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics