Safe Comp 95 pp 252-266 | Cite as

Analysis and Assessment of Advanced Road Transport Telematic Systems

  • Keith M. Hobley
  • Peter H. Jesty
Conference paper

Abstract

The hazard analysis of an Advanced road Transport Telematic system is an essential part of the safety life-cycle. A systematic methodology for performing this task has been produced by the project PASSPORT. For each of the two phases, preliminary safety analysis and detailed safety analysis, novel modelling techniques have been devised upon which to perform the hazard analysis. The assurance that these analyses give, can be used as part of a certification process which covers security, reliability and environmental issues, as well as safety.

Keywords

Assure Dispatch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [89/336/EEC]
    89/336/EEC Council Directive, On the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States to Electromagnetic Compatibility, Official Journal of the European Communities (139), 25 May 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [90/683/EEC]
    90/683/EEC Council Decision, Concerning the Modules for the Various Phases of Conformity Assessment Procedures which are Intended to be Used in the Technical Harmonisation Directives, Official Journal of the European Communities (380), 13 December 1990.Google Scholar
  3. [DRIVE Safely 92]
    DRIVE Safely, Towards a European Standard : The Development of Safe Road Transport Informatic Systems (Draft 2), DRIVE Project V1051, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [EMCATT 95]
    EMC ATT, Functional System Safety and EMC, DRIVE II Project EMCATT (V2064), 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [GIBBS 94]
    W W Gibbs, Software’s Chronic Crisis, Scientific American, pp. 72–81, September 1994.Google Scholar
  6. [IBM]
    IBM, Business System Planning - Information System Guidelines, IBM Document No. GE/20/02572.Google Scholar
  7. [IEC 1508]
    IEC Draft Standard, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Systems; Generic Aspects, IEC reference 65A (Secretariat) 123, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [ITSEC 91]
    ITSEC, Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria (ITSEC); Provisional Harmonised Criteria, Version 1.2, CEC DG XIII, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [ITSEM 92]
    ITSEM, Information Technology Security Evaluation Manual (ITSEM), (Draft) Version 0.2, CEC DG XIII, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. [Jesty 95]
    P H Jesty and K Wolf, Should You Trust New Technology, Traffic Technology International, Spring 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [MISRA 94]
    MISRA, Development Guidelines for Vehicle Based Software, The Motor Industry Research Association (MIRA), ISBN 0 9524156 0 7, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [PASSPORT 95a]
    PASSPORT, Framework for Prospective System Safety Analysis, Deliverable No 9, DRIVE II Project PASSPORT (V2058), 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [PASSPORT 95b]
    PASSPORT, Towards the Certification of ATT Systems - System Safety Aspects, Deliverable N° 8, DRIVE II Project PASSPORT (V2058), 1995.Google Scholar
  14. [SWT_RHA 93]
    SWT_RHA, Report of the Inquiry into the London Ambulance Service, South West Thames Regional Health Authority, 1993, ISBN 0 90513370 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith M. Hobley
    • 1
  • Peter H. Jesty
    • 1
  1. 1.Safety Critical Computing Group, School of Computer StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations