Abstract
The title “Beyond Certainty” is ambiguous in a way that can, but need not, be misleading. Wittgenstein did not claim that we can arrive at no kind of Certainty: merely that the philosophers deceive us if they pretend that the only kind of Certainty that has any intellectual relevance is a formal, geometrical kind. He did not direct us beyond all Certainty, only beyond the monopoly of inappropriate, formal Certainty (decontextual logical necessity) and toward an appropriate, pragmatic Certainty, a well grounded, situated certitude. With the Death of Cartesian foundational epistemology, we do not lose all hope of certainty, only the illusion that the only Certainty worth having is a formal, eternal feature of knowledge, exemplified in the logical coherence of texts. In its place, we recover an alternative Certitude: a timely, pragmatic feature of knowledge, within particular situations and modes of praxis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toulmin, S. (1995). Carved in Stone or Carried by the Wind?. In: Göranzon, B. (eds) Skill, Technology and Enlightenment: On Practical Philosophy. Artificial Intelligence and Society. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3001-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3001-7_19
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19920-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3001-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive