Skip to main content

Pathology of the Fallopian Tube

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Pathology of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneum

Abstract

The fallopian tubes are subjected to a variety of inflammatory and neoplastic lesions. Reactive changes secondary to inflammation may potentially mimic malignancy. Many reactive and benign conditions may also result in tubal narrowing or occlusion and are often the underlying causes of ectopic pregnancy. The tube is the most frequent site of an ectopic pregnancy but is rare for primary gestational trophoblastic diseases. The latter are usually secondary to a lesion from the corpus. Tubal hyperplasia is a poorly defined and overlapping entity; in many cases, they represent precursor lesions of tubal borderline or malignant lesions. Recent advances in genetic testing for BRCA mutations in high-risk families had led to the recognition of early carcinomas of the fallopian tube in prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy specimens. Tubal intraepithelial carcinoma has become the topic of vigorous research in recent years, and this lesion, particularly when found in the fimbriae, is now recognized as the source some ovarian and peritoneal high-grade serous carcinomas. Secondary involvement of the tubes by ovarian carcinomas or those of other sites is more common than primary tubal carcinomas. The commonest primary carcinomas of the fallopian tube are of serous differentiation, followed by endometrioid and transitional cell. Mesenchymal tumors are rare. Benign and malignant tumors of the broad ligament are similar to those arising from the ovaries in many aspects. Identification of sites of origin may sometimes be difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Keith LG, Berger GS, Edelman DA, Newton W, Fullan N, Bailey R, et al. On the causation of pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149(2):215–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Honore LH. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa in female infertility and ectopic tubal pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1978;29(2):164–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Majmudar B, Henderson 3rd PH, Semple E. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: a high-risk factor for tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62(1):73–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jenkins CS, Williams SR, Schmidt GE. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: a review of the literature, discussion of clinical significance, and consideration of patient management. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(4):599–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lisa JR, Gioia JD, Rubin IC. Observations on the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954;92(2):159–69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lisa JR, Rubin IC, Trinidad S. Further observations on ectopic endometrium of the fallopian tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956;103(4):469–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. David MP, Ben-Zwi D, Langer L. Tubal intramural polyps and their relationship to infertility. Fertil Steril. 1981;35(5):526–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rock JA, Parmley TH, King TM, Laufe LE, Su BS. Endometriosis and the development of tuboperitoneal fistulas after tubal ligation. Fertil Steril. 1981;35(1):16–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stock RJ. Postsalpingectomy endometriosis: a reassessment. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60(5):560–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seidman JD. Prognostic importance of hyperplasia and atypia in endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996;15(1):1–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Groisman GM, Meir A. CD10 is helpful in detecting occult or inconspicuous endometrial stromal cells in cases of presumptive endometriosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(8):1003–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nogales FF, Martin F, Linares J, Naranjo R, Concha A. Myxoid change in decidualized scar endometriosis mimicking malignancy. J Cutan Pathol. 1993;20(1):87–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidman JD. Mucinous lesions of the fallopian tube. A report of seven cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18(12):1205–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong AK, Seidman JD, Barbuto DA, McPhaul LW, Silva EG. Mucinous metaplasia of the fallopian tube: a diagnostic pitfall mimicking metastasis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(1):36–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giles A, Yoon J, Lindley R. Multifocal mucinous neoplasia of the female genital system. Histopathology. 1994;25(3):281–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikami Y, Kiyokawa T, Sasajima Y, Teramoto N, Wakasa T, Wakasa K, et al. Reappraisal of synchronous and multifocal mucinous lesions of the female genital tract: a close association with gastric metaplasia. Histopathology. 2009;54(2):184–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Egan AJ, Russell P. Transitional (urothelial) cell metaplasia of the fallopian tube mucosa: morphological assessment of three cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996;15(1):72–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hampton HL, Huffman HT, Meeks GR. Extraovarian brenner tumor. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(5 (Pt 2)):844–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seidman JD, Yemelyanova A, Zaino RJ, Kurman RJ. The fallopian tube-peritoneal junction: a potential site of carcinogenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(1):4–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alvarado-Cabrero I, Navani SS, Young RH, Scully RE. Tumors of the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube: a clinicopathologic analysis of 20 cases, including nine carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16(3):189–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarado-Cabrero I, Young RH, Vamvakas EC, Scully RE. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube: a clinicopathological study of 105 cases with observations on staging and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;72(3):367–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabban JT, Crawford B, Chen LM, Powell CB, Zaloudek CJ. Transitional cell metaplasia of fallopian tube fimbriae: a potential mimic of early tubal carcinoma in risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomies from women With BRCA mutations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(1):111–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Giordano G, D'Adda T, Brigati F, Lombardi M, Raboni S. A unique case of primary squamous carcinoma of the salpinx associated with serous carcinoma of the omentum: a pathological and molecular study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(6):533–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mekni A, Doghri R, Bel Haj Salah M, Tounsi H, Chelly I, Khadija B, et al. Simultaneous squamous carcinoma involving the fallopian tube and the uterine cervix. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(2):157–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hibbard LT. Adnexal torsion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152(4):456–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernardus RE, Van der Slikke JW, Roex AJ, Dijkhuizen GH, Stolk JG. Torsion of the fallopian tube: some considerations on its etiology. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(5):675–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seidman JD, Sherman ME, Bell KA, Katabuchi H, O'Leary TJ, Kurman RJ. Salpingitis, salpingoliths, and serous tumors of the ovaries: is there a connection? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2002;21(2):101–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellsworth HS, Harris JW, McQuarrie HG, Stone RA, Anderson 3rd AE. Prolapse of the fallopian tube following vaginal hysterectomy. JAMA. 1973;;224(6):891–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Silverberg SG, Frable WJ. Prolapse of fallopian tube into vaginal vault after hysterectomy. Histopathology, cytopathology, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol. 1974;97(2):100–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wheelock JB, Schneider V, Goplerud DR. Prolapsed fallopian tube masquerading as adenocarcinoma of the vagina in a postmenopausal woman. Gynecol Oncol. 1985;21(3):369–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Michal M, Rokyta Z, Mejchar B, Pelikan K, Kummel M, Mukensnabl P. Prolapse of the fallopian tube after hysterectomy associated with exuberant angiomyofibroblastic stroma response: a diagnostic pitfall. Virchows Arch. 2000;437(4):436–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Varnholt H, Otis CN, Nucci MR, Johari VP. Fallopian tube prolapse mimicking aggressive angiomyxoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24(3):292–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheung AN, Young RH, Scully RE. Pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia of the fallopian tube associated with salpingitis. A report of 14 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18(11):1125–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yanai-Inbar I, Silverberg SG. Mucosal epithelial proliferation of the fallopian tube: prevalence, clinical associations, and optimal strategy for histopathologic assessment. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19(2):139–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gonzalez FA, Waxman M. Ectopic pregnancy. A retrospective study of 501 consecutive patients. Diagn Gynecol Obstet. 1981;3(3):181–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gonzalez FA, Waxman M. Ectopic pregnancy. A prospective study on differential diagnosis. Diagn Gynecol Obstet. 1981;3(2):101–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Budowick M, Johnson Jr TR, Genadry R, Parmley TH, Woodruff JD. The histopathology of the developing tubal ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1980;34(2):169–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Muto MG, Lage JM, Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Gestational trophoblastic disease of the fallopian tube. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(1):57–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ober WB, Maier RC. Gestational choriocarcinoma of the fallopian tube. Diagn Gynecol Obstet. 1981;3(3):213–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hassadia A, Kew FM, Tidy JA, Wells M, Hancock BW. Ectopic gestational trophoblastic disease: a case series review. J Reprod Med. 2012;57(7–8):297–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fisher RA, Savage PM, MacDermott C, Hook J, Sebire NJ, Lindsay I, et al. The impact of molecular genetic diagnosis on the management of women with hCG-producing malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107(3):413–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vang R, Gupta M, Wu LS, Yemelyanova AV, Kurman RJ, Murphy KM, et al. Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(3):443–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nayar R, Snell J, Silverberg SG, Lage JM. Placental site nodule occurring in a fallopian tube. Hum Pathol. 1996;27(11):1243–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Campello TR, Fittipaldi H, O'Valle F, Carvia RE, Nogales FF. Extrauterine (tubal) placental site nodule. Histopathology. 1998;32(6):562–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kouvidou C, Karayianni M, Liapi-Avgeri G, Toufexi H, Karaiossifidi H. Old ectopic pregnancy remnants with morphological features of placental site nodule occurring in fallopian tube and broad ligament. Pathol Res Pract. 2000;196(5):329–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Baergen RN, Rutgers J, Young RH. Extrauterine lesions of intermediate trophoblast. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003;22(4):362–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gupta N, Mittal S, Misra R, Vimala N, Das AK. Placental site trophoblastic tumor originating in a tubal ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;129(1):92–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Su YN, Cheng WF, Chen CA, Lin TY, Hsieh FJ, Cheng SP, et al. Pregnancy with primary tubal placental site trophoblastic tumor–a case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73(2):322–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Parker A, Lee V, Dalrymple C, Valmadre S, Russell P. Epithelioid trophoblastic tumour: report of a case in the fallopian tube. Pathology. 2003;35(2):136–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tziortziotis DV, Bouros AC, Ziogas VS, Young RH. Clear cell hyperplasia of the fallopian tube epithelium associated with ectopic pregnancy: report of a case. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16(1):79–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Milchgrub S, Sandstad J. Arias-Stella reaction in fallopian tube epithelium. A light and electron microscopic study with a review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;95(6):892–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Vang R, Barner R, Wheeler DT, Strauss BL. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 and p53 helps distinguish endometrial Arias-Stella reaction from high-grade carcinoma, including clear cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004;23(3):223–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zaytsev P, Taxy JB. Pregnancy-associated ectopic decidua. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11(7):526–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tilden IL, Winstedt R. Decidual reactions in fallopian tubes: histologic study of tubal segments from 144 post-partum sterilizations. Am J Pathol. 1943;19(6):1043–55.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Mills SE, Fechner RE. Stromal and epithelial changes in the fallopian tube following hormonal therapy. Hum Pathol. 1980;11(5 Suppl):583–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bartnik J, Powell WS, Moriber-Katz S, Amenta PS. Metaplastic papillary tumor of the fallopian tube. Case report, immunohistochemical features, and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989;113(5):545–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Saffos RO, Rhatigan RM, Scully RE. Metaplastic papillary tumor of the fallopian tube–a distinctive lesion of pregnancy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;74(2):232–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. D'Adda T, Pizzi S, Bottarelli L, Azzoni C, Manni S, Giordano G. Metaplastic papillary tumor of the salpinx: report of a case using microsatellite analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(6):532–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Glazener CM, Loveden LM, Richardson SJ, Jeans WD, Hull MG. Tubo-cornual polyps: their relevance in subfertility. Hum Reprod. 1987;2(1):59–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F, Ferin J, Thomas K. Tubal polyps, epithelial inclusions, and endometriosis after tubal sterilization. Fertil Steril. 1984;41(4):564–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kurman RJ, Vang R, Junge J, Hannibal CG, Kjaer SK, Shih IM. Papillary tubal hyperplasia: the putative precursor of ovarian atypical proliferative (borderline) serous tumors, noninvasive implants, and endosalpingiosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(11):1605–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Yanai-Inbar I, Siriaunkgul S, Silverberg SG. Mucosal epithelial proliferation of the fallopian tube: a particular association with ovarian serous tumor of low malignant potential? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14(2):107–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zheng W, Wolf S, Kramer EE, Cox KA, Hoda SA. Borderline papillary serous tumour of the fallopian tube. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20(1):30–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kayaalp E, Heller DS, Majmudar B. Serous tumor of low malignant potential of the fallopian tube. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19(4):398–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ondic O, Kalis V, Sima R. Borderline papillary serous tumor of the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube with peritoneal implants. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(11):1702–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Abreu R, Dick M, Simoes Silva T, Mota F, Bettencourt E. Serous borderline tumor of the fallopian tube presented as an adnexal mass. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(2):349–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Scully RE, Young RH, Clement PB. Tumors of the fallopian tube: histologic classification and cancer staging, epithelial and mixed epithelial-mesenchymal tumors. In: Rosai JS, Sobin LH, editors. Atlas of tumor pathology tumors of the ovary, maldeveloped gonads, fallopian tube, and broad ligament. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1988. p. 461–76.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nordin AJ. Primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube: a 20-year literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994;49(5):349–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Baekelandt M, Jorunn Nesbakken A, Kristensen GB, Trope CG, Abeler VM. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Cancer. 2000;89(10):2076–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Eddy GL, Copeland LJ, Gershenson DM, Atkinson EN, Wharton JT, Rutledge FN. Fallopian tube carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(4):546–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Goldman JA, Gans B, Eckerling B. Hydrops tubae profluens–symptom in tubal carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;18:631–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Sedlis A. Primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1961;16:209–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Euscher ED, Silva EG, Deavers MT, Elishaev E, Gershenson DM, Malpica A. Serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum presenting as lymphadenopathy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(9):1217–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yeung HH, Bannatyne P, Russell P. Adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tubes: a clinicopathological study of eight cases. Pathology. 1983;15(3):279–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Matsushita H, Kodama S, Aoki Y, Tanaka K, Saito N. Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration with anti-Purkinje cell antibody associated with primary tubal cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;45(2):140–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Seeber J, Reimer D, Muller-Holzner E, Spizzo G, Sepp N, Wiesbauer P, et al. Fallopian tube cancer associated with paraneoplastic dermatomyositis – asymptomatic multivisceral exacerbated dermatomyositis mimicking recurrent widespread malignant disease: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(2):168–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Hellstrom AC. Primary fallopian tube cancer: a review of the literature. Med Oncol. 1998;15(1):6–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Hellstrom AC, Silfversward C, Nilsson B, Pettersson F. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube. A clinical and histopathologic review. The Radiumhemmet series. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994;4(6):395–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Lee Y, Miron A, Drapkin R, Nucci MR, Medeiros F, Saleemuddin A, et al. A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J Pathol. 2007;211(1):26–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Kurman RJ, Shih IM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(3):433–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Kurman RJ, Shih IM. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer–shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(7):918–31.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Vang R, Visvanathan K, Gross A, Maambo E, Gupta M, Kuhn E, et al. Validation of an algorithm for the diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(3):243–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Kuhn E, Kurman RJ, Sehdev AS, Shih IM. Ki-67 labeling index as an adjunct in the diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(5):416–22.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Visvanathan K, Vang R, Shaw P, Gross A, Soslow R, Parkash V, et al. Diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma based on morphologic and immunohistochemical features: a reproducibility study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(12):1766–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. McCluggage WG, Soslow RA, Gilks CB. Patterns of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinomas: ‘all or nothing’ staining is of importance. Histopathology. 2011;59(4):786–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Leonhardt K, Einenkel J, Sohr S, Engeland K, Horn LC. p53 signature and serous tubal in-situ carcinoma in cases of primary tubal and peritoneal carcinomas and serous borderline tumors of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(5):417–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Jarboe EA, Miron A, Carlson JW, Hirsch MS, Kindelberger D, Mutter GL, et al. Coexisting intraepithelial serous carcinomas of the endometrium and fallopian tube: frequency and potential significance. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009;28(4):308–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Chen EY, Mehra K, Mehrad M, Ning G, Miron A, Mutter GL, et al. Secretory cell outgrowth, PAX2 and serous carcinogenesis in the Fallopian tube. J Pathol. 2010;222(1):110–6.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Laury AR, Ning G, Quick CM, Bijron J, Parast MM, Betensky RA, et al. Fallopian tube correlates of ovarian serous borderline tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(12):1759–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Navani SS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Young RH, Scully RE. Endometrioid carcinoma of the fallopian tube: a clinicopathologic analysis of 26 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63(3):371–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Culton LK, Deavers MT, Silva EG, Liu J, Malpica A. Endometrioid carcinoma simultaneously involving the uterus and the fallopian tube: a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(7):844–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Young RH. Neoplasms of the fallopian tube and broad ligament: a selective survey including historical perspective and emphasising recent developments. Pathology. 2007;39(1):112–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Koshiyama M, Konishi I, Yoshida M, Wang DP, Mandai M, Mori T, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of the fallopian tube: a light and electron microscopic study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13(2):175–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Jackson-York GL, Ramzy I. Synchronous papillary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endocervix and fallopian tubes. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1992;11(1):63–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Aoyama T, Mizuno T, Andoh K, Takagi T, Eimoto T. alpha-Fetoprotein-producing (hepatoid) carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63(2):261–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Cheung AN, So KF, Ngan HY, Wong LC. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of fallopian tube. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13(1):92–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Herbold DR, Axelrod JH, Bobowski SJ, Freel JH. Glassy cell carcinoma of the fallopian tube. A case report. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1988;7(4):384–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Peters 3rd WA, Andersen WA, Hopkins MP, Kumar NB, Morley GW. Prognostic features of carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(5):757–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Riska A, Leminen A. Updating on primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(12):1419–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rosen AC, Ausch C, Hafner E, Klein M, Lahousen M, Graf AH, et al. A 15-year overview of management and prognosis in primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Austrian Cooperative Study Group for Fallopian Tube Carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(11):1725–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Rosen AC, Klein M, Hafner E, Lahousen M, Graf AH, Reiner A. Management and prognosis of primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Austrian Cooperative Study Group for Fallopian Tube Carcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47(1):45–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Rosen AC, Reiner A, Klein M, Lahousen M, Graf AH, Vavra N, et al. Prognostic factors in primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Austrian Cooperative Study Group for Fallopian Tube Carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;53(3):307–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, et al. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95 Suppl 1:S145–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Deffieux X, Morice P, Thoury A, Camatte S, Duvillard P, Castaigne D. Anatomy of pelvic and para-aortic nodal spread in patients with primary fallopian tube carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(1):45–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. di Re E, Grosso G, Raspagliesi F, Baiocchi G. Fallopian tube cancer: incidence and role of lymphatic spread. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62(2):199–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Klein M, Rosen A, Lahousen M, Graf A, Vavra N, Beck A, et al. Lymphogenous metastasis in the primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;55(3 Pt 1):336–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Klein M, Rosen AC, Lahousen M, Graf AH, Rainer A. Lymphadenectomy in primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Cancer Lett. 1999;147(1–2):63–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Kindelberger DW, Lee Y, Miron A, Hirsch MS, Feltmate C, Medeiros F, et al. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(2):161–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Seidman JD, Zhao P, Yemelyanova A. “Primary peritoneal” high-grade serous carcinoma is very likely metastatic from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: assessing the new paradigm of ovarian and pelvic serous carcinogenesis and its implications for screening for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120(3):470–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Colgan TJ. Challenges in the early diagnosis and staging of fallopian-tube carcinomas associated with BRCA mutations. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003;22(2):109–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Aziz S, Kuperstein G, Rosen B, Cole D, Nedelcu R, McLaughlin J, et al. A genetic epidemiological study of carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80(3):341–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Cass I, Holschneider C, Datta N, Barbuto D, Walts AE, Karlan BY. BRCA-mutation-associated fallopian tube carcinoma: a distinct clinical phenotype? Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(6):1327–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Levine DA, Argenta PA, Yee CJ, Marshall DS, Olvera N, Bogomolniy F, et al. Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas associated with BRCA mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(22):4222–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Medeiros F, Muto MG, Lee Y, Elvin JA, Callahan MJ, Feltmate C, et al. The tubal fimbria is a preferred site for early adenocarcinoma in women with familial ovarian cancer syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(2):230–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Powell CB, Kenley E, Chen LM, Crawford B, McLennan J, Zaloudek C, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: role of serial sectioning in the detection of occult malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(1):127–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Agoff SN, Garcia RL, Goff B, Swisher E. Follow-up of in situ and early-stage fallopian tube carcinoma in patients undergoing prophylactic surgery for proven or suspected BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 mutations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(8):1112–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Carcangiu ML, Peissel B, Pasini B, Spatti G, Radice P, Manoukian S. Incidental carcinomas in prophylactic specimens in BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutation carriers, with emphasis on fallopian tube lesions: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(10):1222–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Finch A, Shaw P, Rosen B, Murphy J, Narod SA, Colgan TJ. Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100(1):58–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Shaw PA, Rouzbahman M, Pizer ES, Pintilie M, Begley H. Candidate serous cancer precursors in fallopian tube epithelium of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(9):1133–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Lee Y, Medeiros F, Kindelberger D, Callahan MJ, Muto MG, Crum CP. Advances in the recognition of tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: applications to cancer screening and the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13(1):1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Youngs LA, Taylor HB. Adenomatoid tumors of the uterus and fallopian tube. Am J Clin Pathol. 1967;48(6):537–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Skinnider BF, Young RH. Infarcted adenomatoid tumor: a report of five cases of a facet of a benign neoplasm that may cause diagnostic difficulty. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(1):77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Mondal SK. Adenofibroma and ectopic pregnancy of left fallopian tube: a rare coexistence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(3):690–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Leeper K, Garcia R, Swisher E, Goff B, Greer B, Paley P. Pathologic findings in prophylactic oophorectomy specimens in high-risk women. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87(1):52–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Agoff SN, Mendelin JE, Grieco VS, Garcia RL. Unexpected gynecologic neoplasms in patients with proven or suspected BRCA-1 or −2 mutations: implications for gross examination, cytology, and clinical follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(2):171–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Gollard R, Kosty M, Bordin G, Wax A, Lacey C. Two unusual presentations of mullerian adenosarcoma: case reports, literature review, and treatment considerations. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;59(3):412–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Hellström A-C, Auer G, Silfverswärd C, Pettersson F. Prognostic factors in malignant mixed Müllerian tumor of the fallopian tube: the Radiumhemmet series 1923–1994. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1996;6(6):467–72.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Carlson Jr JA, Ackerman BL, Wheeler JE. Malignant mixed mullerian tumor of the fallopian tube. Cancer. 1993;71(1):187–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Imachi M, Tsukamoto N, Shigematsu T, Watanabe T, Uehira K, Amada S, et al. Malignant mixed Mullerian tumor of the fallopian tube: report of two cases and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;47(1):114–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Weber AM, Hewett WF, Gajewski WH, Curry SL. Malignant mixed mullerian tumors of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;50(2):239–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Gagner JP, Mittal K. Malignant mixed Mullerian tumor of the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube: origin as an intraepithelial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(1):219–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Ben-Ami M, Battino S, Shalev E. Pregnancy following GnRH agonist therapy of uterine leiomyoma obstructing a single fallopian tube. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(5):780–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Misao R, Niwa K, Iwagaki S, Shimokawa K, Tamaya T. Leiomyoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;49(4):279–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Mroueh J, Margono F, Feinkind L. Tubal pregnancy associated with ampullary tubal leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(5 (Pt 2)):880–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Jacoby AF, Fuller Jr AF, Thor AD, Muntz HG. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51(3):404–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Buchwalter CL, Jenison EL, Fromm M, Mehta VT, Hart WR. Pure embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;67(1):95–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Mitsuhashi A, Nagai Y, Suzuka K, Yamazawa K, Nojima T, Nikaido T, et al. Primary synovial sarcoma in fallopian tube: case report and literature review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2007;26(1):34–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Halligan AW, McGuinness EP. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the fallopian tube. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(3):275–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Foster R, Solano S, Mahoney J, Fuller A, Oliva E, Seiden MV. Reclassification of a tubal leiomyosarcoma as an eGIST by molecular evaluation of c-KIT. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(2):363–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Mazur MT, Hsueh S, Gersell DJ. Metastases to the female genital tract. Analysis of 325 cases. Cancer. 1984;53(9):1978–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Snyder MJ, Bentley R, Robboy SJ. Transtubal spread of serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: an underrecognized mechanism of metastasis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(2):155–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Pins MR, Young RH, Crum CP, Leach IH, Scully RE. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ with intraepithelial extension to the upper genital tract and invasion of tubes and ovaries: report of a case with human papilloma virus analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16(3):272–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Dos Santos LA, Garg K, Diaz JP, Soslow RA, Hensley ML, Alektiar KM, et al. Incidence of lymph node and adnexal metastasis in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(2):319–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Samaha M, Woodruff JD. Paratubal cysts: frequency, histogenesis, and associated clinical features. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(5):691–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Kariminejad MH, Scully RE. Female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin. A distinctive pathologic entity. Cancer. 1973;31(3):671–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Rahilly MA, Williams AR, Krausz T, al Nafussi A. Female adnexal tumour of probable Wolffian origin: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of three cases. Histopathology. 1995;26(1):69–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Ramirez PT, Wolf JK, Malpica A, Deavers MT, Liu J, Broaddus R. Wolffian duct tumors: case reports and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;86(2):225–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Daya D. Malignant female adnexal tumor of probable wolffian origin with review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1994;118(3):310–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Silver SA, Tavassoli FA. Wolffian adnexal tumor, so-called female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin (FATWO): immunohistochemical evidence in support of a Wolffian origin. Hum Pathol. 1999;30(7):856–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Tiltman AJ, Allard U. Female adnexal tumours of probable Wolffian origin: an immunohistochemical study comparing tumours, mesonephric remnants and paramesonephric derivatives. Histopathology. 2001;38(3):237–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Aydin H, Young RH, Ronnett BM, Epstein JI. Clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis and mesosalpinx: immunohistochemical differentiation from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(4):520–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Gersell DJ, King TC. Papillary cystadenoma of the mesosalpinx in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988;12(2):145–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Korn WT, Schatzki SC, DiSciullo AJ, Scully RE. Papillary cystadenoma of the broad ligament in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(2):596–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Werness BA, Guccion JG. Tumor of the broad ligament in von Hippel-Lindau disease of probable mullerian origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16(3):282–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Clarke BA, Rahimi K, Chetty R. Leiomyosarcoma of the broad ligament with osteoclast-like giant cells and rhabdoid cells. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(5):432–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip P. C. Ip MB ChB, FRCPath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ip, P.P.C., Cheung, A.N.Y. (2014). Pathology of the Fallopian Tube. In: Wilkinson, N. (eds) Pathology of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneum. Essentials of Diagnostic Gynecological Pathology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2942-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2942-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2941-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2942-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics