Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applications of SEQUAL

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems

  • 1468 Accesses

Abstract

Different parts of SEQUAL can be used in a number of different ways, including:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aagedal, J.Ø., Ecklund, E.F.: Modeling QoS: towards a UML profile. In: Proceedings UML 2002, Dresden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • ATHENA: Deliverable DA1.6.1 Evaluation and Benefits Assessment. Krogstie, J., Knothe, T., Anastasio, M., Ohren, O. SINTEF, Oslo (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, F., Henderson-Sellers, B., Opdahl, A.L., Gogolla, M.: The whole-part relationship in the unified modeling language: a new approach. In: Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Unified Modeling Language: System Analysis, Design and Development Issues. IDEA Group, Hershey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, H., Koch, N., Mandel, L.: Towards a UML extension for hypermedia design. In: France, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) UML’99 – The Unified Modeling Language. Beyond the Standard: Second International Conference, pp. 614–629, Fort Collins, CO, October 28–30 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, H., Koch, N., Kosiuczenko, P., Stevens, P., Wirsing, M.: UML for global computing. In: Priami, C. (ed.) Global Computing. Programming Environments, Languages, Security, and Analysis of Systems. LNCS, vol. 2874, pp. 1–24. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berio, G., et al.: Deliverable D 3.1; Requirements analysis: initial core constructs and architecture. (UEML v. 1.0). In: Thematic Network – IST-2001-34229. Torino (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, S.: Model Driven Software Personalization. Smart Objects Conference (SOC2003), Grenoble, France (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language: User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • BPMI: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 1. www.bpmi.org/downloads/BPMN-V1.0.pdf (2004)

  • Davis, A.: Object-oriented requirements to object-oriented design: An easy transition? J. Syst. Softw. 30(1/2), 151–159 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, X.: Overview of models defined with charts of concepts. In: Falkenberg, E., Lyytinen, K., Verrijn-Stuart, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the IFIP8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems Concepts (ISCO4); An Integrated Discipline Emerging, September 20–22, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 235–256 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, M.: Modelling location-aware access control constraints for mobile workflows with UML Activity Diagrams. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, Sliema, Malta (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D.: Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: Workshop on The What, Who, Where, When, and How of Context-Awareness, as Part of the 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000), The Hague (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J., Siau, K.: Can UML be simplified? Practitioner use of UML in separate domains In: proceedings EMMSAD 2007. Proceedings of Twelfth International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in System Analysis and Design, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 89–98 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A., Hole, G.: How to Design and Report Experiments. SAGE Publications, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • FOAF.: FOAF project web page. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec (2010). Last accessed Dec 2011

  • Gandon, F.L., Sadeh, N.M.: Semantic web technologies to reconcile privacy and context awareness. J. Web Semant. 1, 27 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning. CACM 46(10), 79–84 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Génova, G., Llorens, J., Quintana, V.: Digging into Use Case Relationships. In: Proceedings UML 2002, Dresden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, R., Dekhil, M.: Mashups for semantic user profiles. In: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Beijing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjersvik, R., Krogstie, J., Følstad, A.: Participatory development of enterprise process models. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Information Modelling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group, Hershey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R.L.: Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck, J., Rothstein, M.: Linking social networks on the web with FOAF. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI’08, Chicago (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Diagram Notations for Mobile Work Processes Presented at PoEM 2011, Oslo, Norway, 2–3 Nov (2011a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Analytical Evaluation of Notational Adaptations to Capture Location of Activities in Process Models. Technical report M3W-1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim. http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~guttors/m3w1.pdf (2011b)

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapted UML activity diagrams for mobile work processes: experimental comparison of colour and pattern fills. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD’11). Springer, London (2011c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapting UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Process Modelling: Experimental Comparison of Two Notation Alternatives Proceedings PoEM 2010. Springer, Delft, the Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Extending Use and Misuse Cases to Capture Mobile Applications. NOKOBIT – Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi s, pp. 1–14 (2011b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, T.: Supplementing UML with concepts from ORM. In: Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Unified Modeling Language: System Analysis, Design and Development Issues. IDEA Group, Hershey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm, B., Kröner, A.: Decentralized user modeling with UserML and GUMO Heckmann05.pdf. In: Proceedings of DASUM 2005, Edinburgh, Scotland (2005a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm, B., Schmitz, M., Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M.: GUMO – the general user model ontology. In: Proceedings of UM 2005: International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/Edinburgh (2005b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennicker, R., Koch, N.: Systematic design of web applications with UML. In: Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Unified Modeling Language: System Analysis, Design and Development Issues. IDEA Group, Hershey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, R.: Using the UML for architectural description. In: France, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) UML’99 – The Unified Modeling Language. Beyond the Standard: Second International Conference, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 614–629, 28–30 Oct (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitz, M., Kappel, G.: Developing with UML – some pitfalls and workarounds. In: Proceeding UML’98, pp. 9–20. Springer, Mulhouse (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, W.G.: A New View of Statistics (Technical Report). University of Queensland, Australia, Brisbane (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Høydalsvik, G.M., Sindre, G.: On the purpose of object-oriented analysis. In: Paepcke, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA’93) September, pp. 240–255. ACM Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEF-0: Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183, December 21, Announcing the Standard for Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF-0). http://www.idef.com/pdf/idef0.pdf (1993)

  • ISO.: International organization for standardization. Enterprise integration – constructs for ­enterprise modeling (ISO/DIS 19440). Prepared by CEN TC 310 and ISO/TC 184, Geneva (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P.: Domain Specific Modeling. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C.: Extension of the unified modeling language for mobile agents. In: Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Unified Modeling Language: System Analysis, Design and Development Issues. IDEA Group, Hershey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knothe, T., Busselt, C., Böll, D.: Deliverable D2.3 Report on UEML (Needs and Requirements). UEML, Thematic Network – Contract n°: IST – 2001–34229, 2003. www.ueml.org (2001)

  • Kobryn, C.: UML 2001. A standardization odyssey. Commun. ACM 42(10), 29–37 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofod-Petersen, A., Gransæther, P.A., Krogstie, J.: An empirical investigation of attitude towards location-aware social network service. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 8(1), 53–70 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosiuczenko, P.: Sequence Diagrams for Mobility. Workshop Proceedings ER’2002. Springer, Tampere (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacevic, S.: UML and user interface modeling. In: Proceedings UML’98, pp. 253–266. Springer, Mulhouse (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J.: Using quality function deployment in software requirements specification. Paper presented at the fifth international workshop on requirements engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ’99), Heidelberg, 14–15 June 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J.: Using a semiotic framework to evaluate UML for the development of models of high quality. In: Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Unified Modelling Language: Systems Analysis, Design, and Development Issues, pp. 89–106. IDEA Group, Hershey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J., Arnesen, S.: Assessing enterprise modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group, Hershey (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.D.: Interactive models for supporting networked organisations. In: 16th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Riga (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., Jensen, S.M.: Harmonising Business Processes of Collaborative Networked Organization Using Process Modelling in PROVE’04 Toulouse, France (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latella, D., Massink, M., Baumeister, H., Wirsing, M.: Mobile UML statecharts with localities. In: Priami, C., Quaglia, P. (eds.) Global Computing. LNCS, vol. 3267, pp. 34–58. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lauesen, S.: Real-life object-oriented systems. IEEE Softw. 15(2), 76–83 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lodderstedt, T., Basin, D., Doser, J.: SecureUML: a UML-based modeling language for model-driven security. In: Proceedings UML 2002. Springer, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucopoulos, P., Karakostas, V.: System Requirements Engineering. McGraw-Hill, London/New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendis, V.: RDF user profiles – bringing semantic web capabilities to next generation networks and services. In: Proceedings of the ICIN Conference. Bordeaux France, 8–11 Oct (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendling, J., Recker, J., Reijers, H.A.: On the usage of labels and icons in business process models. Int. J. Inform. Syst. Model. Des. 1(2), 40–58 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, D.L.: The “physics” of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35, 756–779 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S., Spanoudakis, G.: 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 3 Maui, Hawaii IEEE CS Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Tu, E.: From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Commun. ACM 42(1), 31–37 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H.J., Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Softw. Qual. J. 20(1), 1–28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L., Swatman, P.A.: Managing the Requirements Engineering Process REFSQ 2001, Interlaken, Switzerland (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nysetvold, A.G., Krogstie, J.: Assessing business process modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research Series, vol. 5, pp. 79–93. Idea Group, Hershey (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OMG: Object Management Group, Business Process Definition Metamodel. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPDM/ (2004)

  • OMG: Unified Modeling Language v 2.0 OMG Web site. http://www.omg.org (2006)

  • OMG: BPMN v2 Specification. Technical report, OMG. (http://www.omg.org/), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/, Jan (2011)

  • Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G.: Experimental comparison of attack trees and misuse cases for security threat identification. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(5), 916–932 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OpenCyc: OpenCyc Web page. http://opencyc.org/. Last accessed Dec 2011 (2011)

  • Petit, M.: Enterprise Modeling Language Comparison Framework: A Proposal, UEML, Europena Commission. http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/rcn/64694_en.html (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pllana, S., Fahringer, T.: On Customizing the UML for Modeling Performance-Oriented Applications. In: Proceedings UML 2002. Springer, Berlin/New York.http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/rcn/64694_en.html (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: How good is BPMN really? Insights from theory and practice. In: 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Goeteborg, Sweden, pp. 1582–1593 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology- versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling language: a comparison. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20, 774–799 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M., Brinkkemper, S.: Complexity metrics for system development methods and techniques. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 209–227 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siau, K., Cao, Q.: Unified Modeling Language (UML) – a complexity analysis. J. Database Manag. 12, 26–34 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindre, G., Krogstie, J.: Process heuristics to achieve requirements specification of feasible quality. In: Pohl, K., Peters, P. (eds.) Second International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ’95), Jyvälskylä, Finland, pp. 92–103 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stan, J., Egyed-Zsigmond, E., Joly, A., Maret, P.: A user profile ontology for situation-aware social networking. In: 3rd Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Ambient Intelligence. Patras, Greece, 21–22 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • SUMO: SUMO Web Page. http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUMO/index.html (2003). Last accessed Dec 2011

  • Taivalsaari, A.: On the notion of inheritance. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(3), 438–479 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubisworld: http://www.ubisworld.org/ (2009). Last accessed Dec 2011

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Don’t go with the flow: web services composition standards exposed. IEEE Intell. Syst. 18(1), 72–76 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W3C: Delivery Context Ontology W3C Working Draft 16 June 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/dcontology/ (2009)

  • Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer, Norwell (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann, J., Ohren, O., Jaekel, F.W., Kahl, T., Knothe, T.: Achieving Enterprise Model Interoperability Applying a Common Enterprise Metamodel. Accepted at INTEROP-ESA 2005, March, Bordeaux, France (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., Specht, M., Lorenz, A.: Personalization and Context Management. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Sem Sælandsvei 7-9, Trondheim, Norway

    John Krogstie

Authors
  1. John Krogstie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krogstie, J. (2012). Applications of SEQUAL. In: Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2936-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2936-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2935-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2936-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation