Skip to main content

Visibility Prediction Software: Five Factors of Contrast Perception for People with Vision Impairment in the Real World

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1773 Accesses

Abstract

The use of colour contrast in the built environment for people with low vision has been largely unsupported for architects, access consultants or designers, with little information available and no easy-to-use tools. Accessible environments assist everyone including vision impaired people (VIP); yet often people can be disabled by buildings, not directly by their impairment (Pullin, 2009); in 2002 a total of 0.6% of the world’s population were listed as blind (Harle and McLannahan, 2008). A recent critique of accessibility recommendations showed a lack of understanding of the five key factors we identified for predicting an object’s visibility (Dalke, 2011) namely, visual ability (VA) of the observer, contrast, lux level, dimension of the object and distance away from the observer. These were established as fundamental for the perception of objects, texts or elements for VIPs, contrast being one of those five interdependent variables (Dalke et al., 2010); they are fundamental to the software that has now been developed to predict object visibility. The research carried out revealed gaps in how to achieve contrast practically for the professionals who should be more familiar with the process. In the USA, the ADA Standard for Accessible Design makes reference to contrast but it is ambiguous and open to interpretation. In the 1991 standard, 70 points of contrast difference are prescribed for marking warnings on walkways (ADA, 1991). But how to gauge contrast, by calculating the difference between the light reflectance values (LRV) of two surfaces, is always missing. In the UK there is no advice on how to check and deliver on contrast for accessible buildings and products (DDA, 2004; EHRC, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ADA (1991) Americans with disabilities act. ADA standards for accessible design. Accessibility guidelines for buildings and facilities. U.S. Department of Justice

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/IESNA (2007) Lighting and the visual environment for senior living, IES RP-28-07. New York, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Barten PGJ (1999) Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. SPIE Press, Bellingham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalke H, Conduit GJ, Conduit B, Cooper R, Corso A, Wyatt DF (2010) A colour contrast assessment system: design for people with visual impairment. In: Langdon PM, Clarkson PJ, Robinson P (eds) Designing inclusive interactions. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalke H (2011) The contrast guide. Cromocon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DDA (2004) Disability discrimination Act. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas G, Corcoran C, Pavey S (2006) Network 1000: opinions and circumstances of VIP people in Great Britain. Visual impairment centre for teaching and research (VICTAR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • EHRC (2010) European human rights commission equality Act. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith S (1967) Designing for the disabled. RIBA Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy E, Ahlburg D, Ali M, Breeze E, Sloggett A (1999) Disability in Great Britain: results from the 1996/97 disability follow-up to the family resources survey. Technical report 94. Department of Social Security, Leeds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Harle J, McLannahan H (2008) Visual impairment: a global view. Oxford University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Piegl LA, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin G (2009) Design meets disability. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers-Ramachandran DC, Ramachandran VS (1998) Psychophysical evidence for boundary and surface systems in human vision. Vis Res 38(1):71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams W (1999) Footcandles and lux for architectural lighting. An introduction to illuminance, 2nd edn. Available at: http://www.mts.net/~william5/library/illum.htm. Accessed 28 Nov 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Dalke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dalke, H., Corso, A., Conduit, G., Riaz, A. (2012). Visibility Prediction Software: Five Factors of Contrast Perception for People with Vision Impairment in the Real World. In: Langdon, P., Clarkson, J., Robinson, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A. (eds) Designing Inclusive Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2867-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2867-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2867-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics