The Impact of Surgical Technique on Cardiac Hemodynamics Following Surgical Ventricular Restoration

  • V Rao Parachuri
  • Srilakshmi M. Adhyapak


The improvements in cardiac anatomy in terms of decreased volumes with resulting clinical improvements following surgical ventricular restoration have been well documented. Improvements in ventricular function were assessed by the left ventricular ejection fraction which showed significant improvements. As detailed in the previous chapter, the technique of surgical ventricular restoration profoundly impacts the effective restoration of a near normal ventricular anatomy and function. The evolution in the surgical techniques has resulted in an evolutionary progress toward near normal ventricular restoration. The hemodynamics in the failing ventricle was discussed in  Chap. 5. In this chapter, the hemodynamics following the various surgical techniques has been discussed. These hemodynamic studies are warranted in the surgically restored ventricle to assess its impact on ventricular function, which directly impacts morbidity and mortality.


Left Ventricular Volume Stroke Volume Index Stroke Work Index Eccentric Hypertrophy Concentric Remodel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Shapira OM, Davidoff R, Hilkert RJ, Aldea GS, Fitzgerald CA, Shemin RA. Repair of left ventricular aneurysm: long term results of linear repair versus endoaneurysmorraphy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:701–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pocar M, Di Mauro A, Massolunghe D, Monneta A, Megali A, Alsheirei TA, Bregasi A, Matteoli R, Donatelli F. Predictors of adverse events after surgical ventricular restoration for advanced ischemic car­diomyopathy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:1093–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tiscler MD, Niggel J, Borowski DT, Le Winter MM. Relation between left ventricular shape and exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:751–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sabbah HN, Konno T, Stein PD, Mancini GB, Goldstein S. Left ventricular shape changes during the course of evolving heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1992;263(1):H266–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tulner SAF, Steendjik P, Klautz RJM, Bax JJ, Shalij MJ, Wall EVD. SVR in patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: evaluation of systolic and diastolic ventricular function, wall stress, dyssynchrony and mechanical efficiency by pressure–volume loops. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:610–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawachi K, Kitamura S, Kawata T, Morita R, Nishii T, Seki T, Taniguchi S, Inoue K. Hemodynamic assessment during exercise after left ventricular aneurysmectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:178–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanoue Y, Ando H, Fukumura F, Umesue M, Uchida T, Taniguchi K, Tanaka J. Ventricular energetics in endoventricular circular patch plasty for dyskinetic anterior left ventricular aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1205–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stephens JD, Dymond DS, Stone DL, Rees GM, Spurrell RAJ. Left ventricular aneurysm and congestive heart failure: value of exercise stress and isosorbide dinitrate in predicting hemodynamic results of aneurysmectomy. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45:932–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Artrip JH, Oz MC, Burkhoff D. Left ventricular volume reduction surgery for heart failure: a physiologic perspective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:775–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suga H, Sagawa K. Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1974;35:117–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkhoff D, et al. Surgical ventricular remodeling: a balancing act on systolic and diastolic properties. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:459–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ten Brinke EA, Klautz RJ, Tulner SA, Verwey HF, Bax JJ, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, Versteegh MI, Dion RA, Steendijk P. Long-term effects of surgical ventricular restoration with additional restrictive mitral annuloplasty and/or coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular function: six-month follow-up by pressure–volume loops. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:1338–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menicanti L, Di Donato M. The Dor procedure: what has changed after fifteen years of clinical practice? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Di Donato M, Sabatier M, Dor V, Gensini GF, Toso A, Maioli M, Stanley AWH, Athanasuleas C, Buckberg G. Effects of the Dor procedure on left ventricular dimension and shape and geometric correlates of mitral regurgitation one year after surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:91–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Ranucci M, Di Donato M. Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on diastolic function: implications of shape and residual ventricular size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1849–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fantini F, Barletta G, Toso A, Baroni M, Di Donato M, Sabatier M, Dor V. Effects of reconstructive surgery for left ventricular anterior aneurysm on ventriculoarterial coupling. Heart. 1999;81:171–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Di Donato MM, Toso A, Dor V, Sabatier M, Barletta G, Menicanti L, Fantini F, and the RESTORE group. Surgical ventricular restoration improves mechanical intraventricular dyssynchrony in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2004;109:2536–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biederman RWW, Doyle M. The contribution of CMR to patients undergoing the surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) procedure; one center’s experience over five years. Open Magn Reson. 2009;2:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Biederman R, Doyle M, Young A. Global and regional mechanics together with reverse remodeling after LV reconstruction surgery: a one year 3-D MRI analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2002;4:142–3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adhyapak SM, Parachuri VR. Lessons from a mathematical hypothesis – modification of the endoventricular circular patch plasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:945–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jacob R, Dierberger B, Gulch RW, Kissling G. Geometric and muscle physiologic factors of the Frank–Starling mechanism. Basic Res Cardiol. 1993;88:86–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacob R, Gulch RW. The functional significance of ventricular geometry for the transition from hypertrophy to cardiac failure. Does a critical degree of structural dilatation exist? Basic Res Cardiol. 1998;93:423–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holubarsch C, Ruf T, Goldstein DJ, Ashton RC, Nickl W, Pieske B, Pioch K, Ludemann J, Weissner S, Hasenfuss G, Poseval H, Just H, Burkhoff D. Existence of the Frank–Starling mechanism in the failing human heart. Circulation. 1996;94:683–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mangano DT, Van Dyke DC, Ellis RJ. The effect of increasing pre load on ventricular output and ejection in man. Limitations of the Frank–Starling mechanism. Circulation. 1980;62:535–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adhyapak SM, Parachuri VR. Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on stroke volume: surgical fine tuning the relationship between end diastolic volume and stroke volume. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(6):1552–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Renlund DG, Gerstenblith G, Fleg JL, Becker LC, Lakatta EG. Interaction between end diastolic and end systolic volumes in normal humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1990;258:H473–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • V Rao Parachuri
    • 1
  • Srilakshmi M. Adhyapak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryNarayana HrudayalayaBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of CardiologySt. John’s Medical College HospitalBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations